Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: citation 14

Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Separate vote: citation 14
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 19 Dec 2024
Result
310 for · 183 against · 50 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
19 December 2024, 12:20
More facts (6)
Position
vote 40 of 46 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Renew, Greens, The Left · separate vote: EPP
Official label
A10–0030/2024 – Lina Gálvez – Citation 14
Text
Report A-10-2024-0030
Dossier
2024/2057(INI)
Vote id
171342
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 310 for, 183 against, 50 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 57 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 99Against 5Abst. 1No vote 31 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
RenewFor 61Against 1Abst. 1No vote 14 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 34Against 66Abst. 28No vote 60 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.27
ECRFor 4Against 50Abst. 6No vote 20 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
PatriotsFor 17Against 33Abst. 10No vote 26 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.33
ESNFor 1Against 19Abst. 2No vote 3 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 11Against 9Abst. 2No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium020
Czechia007
Denmark010
Spain040
France1703
Hungary060
Italy060
Netherlands050
Poland020
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 543 members

No vote recorded, 176

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 176 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 44 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote349 for, 228 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.89 497 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 37 — part 7 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote367 for, 272 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.89 507 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on citation 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote359 for, 210 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.88 493 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital AB Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote354 for, 205 against, 89 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.88 492 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 43 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote358 for, 210 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.88 493 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 23 — part 4 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote361 for, 280 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.88 516 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on recital AL Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote378 for, 197 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.88 475 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on citation 9 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote353 for, 204 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 479 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 41 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote362 for, 214 against, 75 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 493 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital AA Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote362 for, 208 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 492 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171342
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Separate vote: citation 14 — Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 19 December 2024. votingId 171342, reference 2024/2057(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171342 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 19 December 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 19 December 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-12-19, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-12-19/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-12-19-171342,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: citation 14 — Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-12-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171342}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171342},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 171342, reference 2024/2057(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-12-19 (CC BY 4.0)}
}