Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote

Forest reproductive material of the ‘tested’ category

Vote
Final vote
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 17 Dec 2024
Result
499 for · 131 against · 27 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 December 2024, 12:58
More facts (6)
Effect
Passed — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 3 of 3 on the decision
Official label
A10-0022/2024 – Veronika Vrecionová – Commission proposal
Text
Report A-10-2024-0022
Dossier
2024/0214(COD)
Vote id
171138
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 499 for, 131 against, 27 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 76 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Passed.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 42Abst. 1No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
GreensFor 1Against 48Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 124Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 74Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 168Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 64Against 0Abst. 3No vote 11 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 42Against 27Abst. 11No vote 6 of 86Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
ESNFor 18Against 0Abst. 4No vote 3 of 25Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.73
No groupFor 8Against 14Abst. 8No vote 0 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria101
Czechia100
Germany1300
France100
Hungary100
Lithuania100
Poland002
Slovakia001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 657 members

No vote recorded, 62

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 62 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Feb 2025Paragraph 32 — part 1 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Split vote512 for, 89 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 590 voters
7 Oct 2025Final vote on the provisional agreement Revision of the Visa Suspension MechanismFinal518 for, 96 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.78 586 voters
12 Mar 2026Final vote Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Final473 for, 81 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 84 %r · shared0.77 518 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 116 + 117 + 316 + 1 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment536 for, 100 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.77 590 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 37 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardSeparate vote391 for, 90 against, 84 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 515 voters
11 Feb 2025Paragraph 23 — part 1 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Split vote509 for, 113 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.76 587 voters
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 9 The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquacultureSeparate vote481 for, 151 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.76 594 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersSplit vote512 for, 86 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.75 554 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 24 — part 2 Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceabilityAmendment419 for, 97 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 526 voters
10 Jul 2025Final vote Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policiesFinal542 for, 97 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 83 %r · shared0.75 596 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-17/171138
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Final vote — Forest reproductive material of the ‘tested’ category”. Vote, 17 December 2024. votingId 171138, reference 2024/0214(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-17/171138 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 December 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 December 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-12-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-12-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-12-17-171138,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote — Forest reproductive material of the ‘tested’ category}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-12-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-17/171138}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-17/171138},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 171138, reference 2024/0214(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-12-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}