Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 19 — part 4

Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and Russia

Vote
Paragraph 19 — part 4
Result
377 for · 161 against · 52 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
28 November 2024, 12:25
More facts (6)
Position
vote 28 of 45 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN · split vote: The Left · separate vote: ECR, Patriots
Official label
RC-B10-0191/2024 – § 19/4
Vote id
170911
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 377 for, 161 against, 52 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 64 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘removing restrictions on the use of military systems for legitimate defensive operations beyond Ukraine’s borders to deter further Russian aggression;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 8Against 30Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.68
GreensFor 44Against 3Abst. 3No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
S&DFor 89Against 16Abst. 6No vote 25 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.70
RenewFor 55Against 3Abst. 4No vote 15 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
EPPFor 134Against 7Abst. 7No vote 40 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
ECRFor 38Against 8Abst. 20No vote 12 of 78Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
PatriotsFor 8Against 54Abst. 6No vote 18 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
ESNFor 1Against 19Abst. 3No vote 2 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
No groupFor 0Against 21Abst. 3No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium300
Bulgaria001
Czechia300
Denmark100
Estonia100
Finland100
France040
Greece020
Italy0018
Lithuania101
Luxembourg010
Latvia200
Netherlands100
Poland1900
Romania410
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 590 members

No vote recorded, 129

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 129 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 15 — part 3 White paper on the future of European defenceSplit vote422 for, 183 against, 57 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.88 552 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 32 — part 2 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureSplit vote378 for, 160 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 508 voters
19 Sept 2024Separate vote on paragraph 8 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesSeparate vote377 for, 191 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by ESN, ECR, Patriots, The Left, S&Dr · shared0.87 527 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jul 2024Paragraph 5 — part 6 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineSplit vote418 for, 168 against, 71 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 539 voters
17 Jul 2024Paragraph 5 — part 7 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineSplit vote414 for, 193 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 550 voters
9 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineFinal418 for, 135 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.83 495 voters
17 Jul 2024Paragraph 5 — part 4 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineSplit vote393 for, 178 against, 75 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 536 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 15 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceSplit vote448 for, 159 against, 65 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.82 555 voters
19 Sept 2024Paragraph 9 — part 1 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesSplit vote403 for, 159 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 521 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 252 — part 6 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote424 for, 152 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 496 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Paragraph 19 — part 4 — Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and Russia”. Vote, 28 November 2024. votingId 170911, reference 2024/2940(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-11-28/170911 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 November 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 November 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-11-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-11-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2024-11-28-170911,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 19 — part 4 — Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and Russia}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-11-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-11-28/170911}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-11-28/170911},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 170911, reference 2024/2940(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-11-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}