Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 16 — part 2 to paragraph 5

Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environments

Vote
Amendment 16 — part 2 to paragraph 5
Result
149 for · 403 against · 26 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
28 November 2024, 12:29
More facts (6)
Position
vote 10 of 50 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR · split vote: EPP
Official label
RC-B10-0173/2024 – § 5 – Am 16/2
Vote id
170737
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 149 for, 403 against, 26 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 26 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “regrets that the lack of differentiation with regard to smoke-free environments gives the wrong signal, undermines the use of new and emerging products for those switching entirely away from cigarettes and perpetuates misconceptions about their relative risks, as the Commission was unable to support its proposal with conclusive scientific evidence regarding the impact of second-hand aerosols;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 111Abst. 0No vote 25 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 55Abst. 7No vote 15 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
EPPFor 13Against 129Abst. 2No vote 44 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
ECRFor 48Against 2Abst. 14No vote 14 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.63
PatriotsFor 56Against 10Abst. 1No vote 19 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 25Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 9Against 10Abst. 2No vote 9 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria040
Belgium040
Bulgaria020
Germany0120
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0180
Finland020
France0120
Greece010
Croatia040
Italy0190
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Malta030
Netherlands040
Poland030
Portugal070
Romania030
Sweden050
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 578 members

No vote recorded, 141

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 141 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 2 Clean Industrial DealAmendment134 for, 410 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 488 voters
14 Nov 2024Amendment 4 to recital G UN Climate Change Conference 2024 in Baku, Azerbaijan (COP29)Amendment184 for, 453 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 528 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 15 to paragraph 3 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Amendment188 for, 460 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 539 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Feb 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 2 Repression by the Ortega-Murillo regime in Nicaragua, targeting human rights defenders, political opponents and religious communities in particularAmendment147 for, 395 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 468 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 20 to paragraph 55 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment186 for, 458 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 536 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 39 to paragraph 120, after point vii Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment198 for, 441 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.87 528 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 395 to recital 19 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment187 for, 442 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 520 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 35 to paragraph 17 Clean Industrial DealAmendment170 for, 379 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.87 477 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 56 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment184 for, 448 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 529 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment195 for, 468 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 553 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Amendment 16 — part 2 to paragraph 5 — Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environments”. Vote, 28 November 2024. votingId 170737, reference 2024/2911(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-11-28/170737 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 November 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 November 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-11-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-11-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2024-11-28-170737,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 16 — part 2 to paragraph 5 — Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environments}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-11-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-11-28/170737}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-11-28/170737},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 170737, reference 2024/2911(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-11-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}