Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 24 Oct 2024
Result
432 for · 60 against · 71 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
24 October 2024, 13:17
More facts (7)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 13 of 20 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew
Official label
RC-B10-0134/2024 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text
Motion B-10-2024-0137
Dossier
2024/2891(RSP)
Vote id
170351
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 432 for, 60 against, 71 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 77 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 7Against 25Abst. 5No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.51
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 3No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
S&DFor 102Against 0Abst. 4No vote 30 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 56Against 0Abst. 0No vote 21 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 140Against 0Abst. 6No vote 42 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 58Against 0Abst. 9No vote 11 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
PatriotsFor 22Against 1Abst. 39No vote 24 of 86Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.44
ESNFor 1Against 16Abst. 3No vote 5 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
No groupFor 4Against 18Abst. 2No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria400
Belgium200
Bulgaria300
Czechia300
Germany2700
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain1500
Finland300
France500
Greece006
Croatia400
Hungary600
Ireland400
Italy600
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta200
Netherlands600
Poland2300
Portugal500
Romania500
Sweden400
Slovenia400
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 563 members

No vote recorded, 156

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 156 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 1, point g EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the ArcticSeparate vote538 for, 75 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 82 %r · shared0.89 516 voters
26 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 1, point e EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the ArcticSeparate vote532 for, 85 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.88 518 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 258 — part 4 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote439 for, 93 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 472 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Nov 2024Paragraph 4 — part 2 Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and RussiaSplit vote443 for, 73 against, 70 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 490 voters
9 Oct 2024Paragraph 22 — part 2 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaSplit vote487 for, 113 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by EPP, ESNr · shared0.86 522 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 252 — part 3 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote456 for, 96 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 473 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 259 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote471 for, 85 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 481 voters
8 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 78 2025 Commission report on UkraineSeparate vote498 for, 132 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.84 507 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 258 — part 3 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote476 for, 71 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 475 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 258 — part 5 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote510 for, 67 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 478 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 5 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-24/170351
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Final vote on the whole text — People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan”. Vote, 24 October 2024. votingId 170351, reference 2024/2891(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-24/170351 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 24 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 24 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-24, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-10-24/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-10-24-170351,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-10-24},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-24/170351}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-24/170351},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 170351, reference 2024/2891(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-24 (CC BY 4.0)}
}