Skip to content

Decision

People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan

Effect
Adopted
Result
432 for · 60 against · 71 abstained roll call
Date
24 October 2024, 13:15–13:17
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Motion for a resolution
Topics
Foreign affairsDefence & security Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
20 votes · 5 roll calls · 1 amendment
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · Renew (1 roll call) · EPP (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · Patriots (1 roll call)
Final vote
170351
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 432 for, 60 against, 71 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 11 parts of the text voted on separately (5 adopted, 6 rejected). 7 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by The Left and ESN; Patriots mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 7Against 25Abst. 5No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.51
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 3No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
S&DFor 102Against 0Abst. 4No vote 30 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 56Against 0Abst. 0No vote 21 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 140Against 0Abst. 6No vote 42 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 58Against 0Abst. 9No vote 11 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
PatriotsFor 22Against 1Abst. 39No vote 24 of 86Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.44
ESNFor 1Against 16Abst. 3No vote 5 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
No groupFor 4Against 18Abst. 2No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 38

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria120530.56
Belgium162040.83
Bulgaria6308—
Cyprus1005—
Czechia134040.65
Germany60172170.64
Denmark100051.00
Estonia6001—
Spain4035120.75
Finland120031.00
France36827100.26
Greece44850.25
Croatia100021.00
Hungary71013—
Ireland90230.73
Italy4690210.75
Lithuania5024—
Luxembourg5001—
Latvia5013—
Malta2031—
Netherlands220450.77
Poland441530.82
Portugal171120.84
Romania1115160.47
Sweden200011.00
Slovenia6003—
Slovakia76110.25

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 563 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

No plenary speech is linked to this dossier.

All votes on this decision, 20

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Vote on text inserted after paragraph 2 Show of hands Rejected
2Vote on text inserted after paragraph 3 Show of hands Rejected
3Vote on text inserted after paragraph 3 Show of hands Rejected
Show the other 19 votesShow the other 17 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Vote on text inserted after paragraph 3 Show of hands Rejected
3Vote on text inserted after paragraph 3 Show of hands Rejected
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Vote on text inserted after paragraph 3 Show of hands Rejected
5Separate vote on paragraph 4 RC-B10-0134/2024 – § 4 Roll call511 for, 9 against, 50 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
6Vote on text inserted after paragraph 5 Show of hands Rejected
7Paragraph 6 — part 1 RC-B10-0134/2024 – § 6/1 Part voted on: ‘Reiterates the EU’s commitment to its ‘One China’ policy as the political foundation of EU-China relations;’Roll call531 for, 4 against, 37 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left; split: The Left
8Separate vote on paragraph 6 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: The Left
9Separate vote on paragraph 8 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: EPP
10Paragraph 8 — part 2 RC-B10-0134/2024 – § 8/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call488 for, 44 against, 37 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP; split: EPP
11Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 17 RC-B10-0134/2024 – After § 17 – Am 1 Roll call162 for, 378 against, 16 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
12Vote on text inserted after paragraph 21 Show of hands Rejected
13Final vote — text as a whole RC-B10-0134/2024 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call432 for, 60 against, 71 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew
14Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0130/2024 Show of hands Lapsed
15Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0132/2024 Show of hands Lapsed
16Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0134/2024 Show of hands Lapsed
17Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0135/2024 Show of hands Lapsed
18Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0137/2024 Show of hands Lapsed
19Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0138/2024 Show of hands Lapsed
20Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0140/2024 Show of hands Lapsed

Roll calls requested by The Left, Renew, EPP, Patriots · split votes by The Left, EPP.

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2024-0137

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on China's misinterpretation of UN Resolution 2758 and its military provocations around Taiwan.

The text states that UN Resolution 2758 does not give China sovereignty over Taiwan or the right to represent it at the UN.

Parliament condemns China's military drills and calls for preserving peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The resolution condemns China's military provocations around Taiwan and its interpretation of UN Resolution 2758, reaffirms the EU's One China policy, and calls for enhanced EU-Taiwan cooperation and Taiwan's meaningful participation in international organizations.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/2891(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject

Parliament adopted the text on 24 October 2024. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 3 steps of the dossier
  1. Tabled for plenary (done)
  2. Plenary vote · Adopted 24 October 2024 (done)
  3. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 5 connections: Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan”. Decision, 24 October 2024. votingId 170351, document B-10-2024-0137, reference 2024/2891(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-10-24/2 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 24 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 24 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-24, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-10-24/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2024-10-24-2,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-10-24},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-10-24/2}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-10-24/2},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 170351, document B-10-2024-0137, reference 2024/2891(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-24 (CC BY 4.0)}
}