Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1, after paragraph 17

People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan

Vote
Amendment 1, after paragraph 17
Result
162 for · 378 against · 16 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
24 October 2024, 13:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 11 of 20 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
RC-B10-0134/2024 – After § 17 – Am 1
Vote id
170350
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 162 for, 378 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 2No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 93Abst. 1No vote 41 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 1Against 56Abst. 0No vote 20 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 8Against 143Abst. 0No vote 37 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 61Against 0Abst. 5No vote 12 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
PatriotsFor 63Against 0Abst. 1No vote 22 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 20Against 0Abst. 1No vote 4 of 25Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 8Against 8Abst. 6No vote 8 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Czechia800
Spain600
France2800
Italy400
Latvia001
Netherlands500
Poland200
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 556 members

No vote recorded, 163

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 163 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment192 for, 450 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 512 voters
14 Nov 2024Amendment 4 to recital G UN Climate Change Conference 2024 in Baku, Azerbaijan (COP29)Amendment184 for, 453 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 511 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 47 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment205 for, 433 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.95 509 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Amendment 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment174 for, 446 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by ECR, S&Dr · shared0.95 506 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment195 for, 468 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 526 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment191 for, 472 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 521 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 13 to recital P Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment198 for, 444 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 512 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 47 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 437 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.95 508 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 18 Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola SummitAmendment179 for, 395 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 462 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 35 to paragraph 17 Clean Industrial DealAmendment170 for, 379 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.94 456 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Amendment 1, after paragraph 17 — People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan”. Vote, 24 October 2024. votingId 170350, reference 2024/2891(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-24/170350 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 24 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 24 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-24, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-10-24/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2024-10-24-170350,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1, after paragraph 17 — People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-10-24},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-24/170350}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-24/170350},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 170350, reference 2024/2891(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-24 (CC BY 4.0)}
}