Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 6 — part 1

People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan

Vote
Paragraph 6 — part 1
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 24 Oct 2024
Result
531 for · 4 against · 37 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
24 October 2024, 13:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 20 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0134/2024 – § 6/1
Text
Motion B-10-2024-0137
Dossier
2024/2891(RSP)
Vote id
170345
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 531 for, 4 against, 37 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 93 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘Reiterates the EU’s commitment to its ‘One China’ policy as the political foundation of EU-China relations;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 34Against 2Abst. 1No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 105Against 0Abst. 1No vote 30 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 57Against 1Abst. 0No vote 19 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 149Against 1Abst. 0No vote 38 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 65Against 0Abst. 2No vote 11 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 43Against 0Abst. 21No vote 22 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.51
ESNFor 19Against 0Abst. 2No vote 4 of 25Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 15Against 0Abst. 10No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany210
Denmark100
Spain301
Finland200
France800
Greece100
Ireland200
Italy900
Netherlands100
Portugal110
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 572 members

No vote recorded, 147

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 147 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 5 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-24/170345
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Paragraph 6 — part 1 — People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan”. Vote, 24 October 2024. votingId 170345, reference 2024/2891(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-24/170345 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 24 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 24 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-24, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-10-24/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-10-24-170345,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 6 — part 1 — People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-10-24},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-24/170345}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-24/170345},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 170345, reference 2024/2891(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-24 (CC BY 4.0)}
}