Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 4

People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 4
Result
511 for · 9 against · 50 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
24 October 2024, 13:15
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 20 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0134/2024 – § 4
Vote id
170343
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 511 for, 9 against, 50 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 90 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 15Against 1Abst. 21No vote 9 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.35
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 104Against 2Abst. 0No vote 30 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 57Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 145Against 0Abst. 6No vote 37 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 63Against 0Abst. 2No vote 13 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
PatriotsFor 62Against 1Abst. 1No vote 22 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ESNFor 18Against 0Abst. 3No vote 4 of 25Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
No groupFor 3Against 5Abst. 17No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria300
Belgium200
Bulgaria400
Czechia400
Germany2800
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain1500
Finland300
France500
Greece006
Croatia500
Hungary600
Ireland400
Italy700
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta200
Netherlands600
Poland2300
Portugal600
Romania500
Sweden400
Slovenia400
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 570 members

No vote recorded, 149

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 149 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Separate vote: paragraph 4 — People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan”. Vote, 24 October 2024. votingId 170343, reference 2024/2891(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-24/170343 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 24 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 24 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-24, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-10-24/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2024-10-24-170343,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 4 — People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-10-24},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-24/170343}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-24/170343},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 170343, reference 2024/2891(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-24-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-24 (CC BY 4.0)}
}