Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group

Vote
Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 7 Oct 2024
Result
85 for · 335 against · 5 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
7 October 2024, 18:26
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group
Vote id
169725
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 85 for, 335 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 20 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 31Abst. 0No vote 14 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
GreensFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 78Abst. 0No vote 58 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 45Abst. 1No vote 31 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 0Against 111Abst. 2No vote 74 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 13Against 21Abst. 1No vote 43 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.40
PatriotsFor 53Against 0Abst. 0No vote 33 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 10Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 25Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 8Against 5Abst. 1No vote 16 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium100
Czechia700
Spain100
France2600
Hungary900
Italy200
Netherlands300
Poland200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 425 members

No vote recorded, 293

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 293 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Feb 2026Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 27 European Central Bank – annual report 2025Amendment139 for, 491 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 385 voters
27 Nov 2024Final vote — text as a whole Presentation by the President-elect of the Commission of the College of Commissioners and its programmeFinal154 for, 507 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by Patriots, The Leftr · shared0.92 411 voters
10 Feb 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN GroupOther99 for, 317 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 23 %r · shared0.92 325 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Amendment 512 Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment145 for, 494 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 393 voters
10 Mar 2026Proposal to vote on amendments Establishing an EU talent poolProcedural160 for, 462 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.91 369 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 5, adding text after recital A The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment165 for, 464 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.91 384 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 37 to paragraph 11 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment151 for, 468 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by S&D, ESNr · shared0.91 391 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Data Protection SupervisorAmendment118 for, 507 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 389 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 44 to paragraph 28 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment97 for, 525 against, 57 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 398 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 63, adding text after paragraph 21 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment127 for, 497 against, 54 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 396 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-07/169725
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group”. Vote, 7 October 2024. votingId 169725. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-07/169725 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-10-07/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-10-07-169725,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-10-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-07/169725}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-07/169725},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 169725. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}