Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Decision

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group

Effect
Rejected
Result
85 for · 335 against · 5 abstained roll call
Date
7 October 2024, 18:26
Kind
Agenda vote
More facts (4)
Margin
by a large majority
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Sitting
Monday 7 October 2024
Final vote
169725
More
Cite this page Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page
Votes on this decision
Members on the final vote

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 85 for, 335 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Rejected by a large majority.

The agenda was left unchanged.

Backed by Patriots and ESN; opposed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 31Abst. 0No vote 14 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
GreensFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 78Abst. 0No vote 58 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 45Abst. 1No vote 31 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 0Against 111Abst. 2No vote 74 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 13Against 21Abst. 1No vote 43 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.40
PatriotsFor 53Against 0Abst. 0No vote 33 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 10Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 25Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 8Against 5Abst. 1No vote 16 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 4

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria211070.77
Belgium1110100.88
Bulgaria14012—
Cyprus1203—
Czechia75270.25
Germany8491380.77
Denmark0906—
Estonia0106—
Spain1251330.89
Finland010051.00
France27320220.31
Greece014071.00
Croatia02010—
Hungary107040.38
Ireland0608—
Italy2390350.93
Lithuania0506—
Luxembourg1302—
Latvia0504—
Malta0402—
Netherlands321070.81
Poland14210170.40
Portugal0100111.00
Romania1100220.86
Sweden215040.82
Slovenia0711—
Slovakia47040.45

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 425 members

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Roll call85 for, 335 against, 5 abstained Rejected

Text

The text voted on.

Parliament’s vote records link no text to this decision.

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 5 connections: Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-10-07/1
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group”. Decision, 7 October 2024. votingId 169725. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-10-07/1 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-10-07/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-decision-2024-10-07-1,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-10-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-10-07/1}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-10-07/1},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 169725. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}