Skip to content

Topic · Subtopic · model-assigned

Asylum rules

Decisions about asylum procedures, reception of asylum seekers, refugee status or the migration and asylum pact.

Decisions
4 on 2 sitting days
Outcomes
4 adopted · 0 rejected
Period
17 Dec 2025 – 10 Feb 2026
Assigned by
A model, not checked by hand
More facts (4)
Roll-call votes
4
By kind
New laws 4
Key
migration/asylum
More

Decisions, 4

Export

The latest decisions on this subtopic, newest first; the export holds all of them.

Effect: what the decision did. Final vote: for–against–abstained, and how it was recorded.
DateDecisionKindEffectFinal vote
10 Feb 2026Establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union level (No. 1, 10 Feb 2026) New lawsPassed408 for, 184 against, 60 abstained by roll call
10 Feb 2026Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept (No. 2, 10 Feb 2026) New lawsPassed396 for, 226 against, 30 abstained by roll call
17 Dec 2025Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept (No. 1, 17 Dec 2025) New lawsNegotiating mandate approved384 for, 237 against, 31 abstained by roll call
17 Dec 2025Establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union level (No. 2, 17 Dec 2025) New lawsNegotiating mandate approved396 for, 202 against, 56 abstained by roll call

Dossiers, 2

The dossiers these decisions belong to, the one voted on most recently first.

Decisions: decisions on the dossier counted here. Latest decision: its date and outcome.
DossierDecisionsLatest decision
Establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union level 2025-0101Decisions210 Feb 2026 · Adopted
Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept 2025-0132Decisions210 Feb 2026 · Adopted

These dossiers in the register

Group lines

How each group voted on the final votes of this subtopic: its clear line or divided.

The last 4 final roll-call votes. Each group’s line on the final votes, with members counted in the group they sat in on the day; a clear line = at least two thirds of the group’s votes with at least 10 members voting (method). For / Against / Abstained: its clear line. Divided: no clear line. With the outcome: votes where its majority line matched the result. Votes: finals the group voted on.
GroupForAgainstAbstainedDividedWith the outcomeVotes
The LeftFor0Against4Abst.0Divided0With outcome0of4
GreensFor0Against4Abst.0Divided0With outcome0of4
S&DFor0Against4Abst.0Divided0With outcome0of4
RenewFor0Against0Abst.0Divided4With outcome0of4
EPPFor4Against0Abst.0Divided0With outcome4of4
ECRFor4Against0Abst.0Divided0With outcome4of4
PatriotsFor4Against0Abst.0Divided0With outcome4of4
ESNFor4Against0Abst.0Divided0With outcome4of4

Connections

Topics and issues that come up together with this one, and its main dossiers.

Running issues

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Asylum rules”. Topic (model-assigned). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/topics/migration?sub=asylum (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-topic-migration-asylum,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Asylum rules}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/topics/migration?sub=asylum}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/topics/migration?sub=asylum},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Topic (model-assigned). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}