Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report

AFET-PR-774242 → A-10-2025-0206

From
AFET-PR-774242 report parliamentary committee draft of 10 Jun 2025
To
A-10-2025-0206 Plenary report of 23 Oct 2025
Changes
6 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+61 added · −30 removed · 4 changed
More facts (3)
Title (from)
on addressing transnational repression of human rights defenders
Title (to)
on addressing transnational repression of human rights defenders
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

The report now proposes a formal definition of transnational repression and adds detailed statistics on its prevalence, naming specific perpetrator states.23 New provisions address digital repression, including spyware, social media, and technology companies' accountability, with calls for due diligence and reporting mechanisms.3 Protection measures for human rights defenders are expanded, covering visas, asylum, relocation, and support for gender-specific threats.35 The report strengthens calls for sanctions, legal accountability, and diplomatic coordination against perpetrators, including within EU member states.45 The other changes are formal: updated statistics in the explanatory statement.6

The notes class 4 changes as substance, 1 as formal, 1 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 2 of 3: Paragraphs 61–108

Added12. Highlights the importance of recognising that transnational repression against HRDs disproportionately affects those with vulnerabilities linked to race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexuality, disability or socio-economic status;

RemovedIII. Enhancing coordinated monitoring and data collection

Added13. Underlines that, in some parts of the world, journalists can be exposed to transnational repression patterns, with long-lasting repercussions for their careers and personal safety;

Removed12. Calls on the EEAS and the Member States to coordinate efforts and set up information, data, tracking and reporting mechanisms to improve the documentation of cases of TNR on their territories and to establish focal points for HRDs in EU delegations;

AddedMainstreaming transnational repression in EU policies

Removed13. Calls on the Commission to establish a centralised mechanism to register, monitor and assess incidents of TNR against HRDs in the EU, which will help to identify gaps in EU policy and formulate adequate strategic responses;

Added14. Calls on the Commission, the Member States and the European External Action Service (EEAS) to systematically address transnational repression in the context of human rights clauses in EU agreements, where relevant, and human rights dialogues with non-EU countries and other forums for bilateral and multilateral cooperation, such as the UN Human Rights Council;

Removed14. Calls on the Member States to codify TNR in national legislation, with the aim of helping government institutions to identify and prevent TNR;

Added15. Urges the EEAS to assist HRDs and targeted individuals, including dissidents, who are victims of transnational repression in non-EU countries, through dedicated programmes aimed at enabling them to continue their work in exile, while remaining safe from reprisals and aggression;

Removed15. Calls on the Member States and Europol to provide training on TNR awareness to relevant government agencies, external service providers and their staff, especially cybersecurity, law enforcement and immigration officers and staff tasked with handling visa applications and reviewing extradition requests and other forms of legal cooperation with non-EU countries;

Added16. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to include transnational repression in the post-2027 EU Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy and in the EU Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders as a growing threat to HRDs and targeted individuals, and to include concrete provisions for the protection and safety of HRDs;

RemovedIV. Addressing the risks posed by digital technologies as enablers of TNR

Added17. Insists on the urgent need to address, both at national and EU level, the protection gaps faced by HRDs when targeted by transnational repression; calls for them to be given fast-track, flexible, accessible and sustained support, including emergency support, temporary relocation and tools and training to enable them to better protect themselves against all kinds of threats and unlawful surveillance that may amount to transnational repression; stresses the need to provide digital and cyber security training, legal assistance and psychosocial support for HRDs affected by transnational repression; considers it paramount that protection policies and programmes be victim-centered, gender-sensitive, intersectional, inclusive and non-discriminatory;

Removed16. Calls for the EU and its Member States to tackle digital forms of TNR;

Added18. Urges the Commission and the EEAS to coordinate EU-wide shelter and protection programmes for HRDs, facilitating referrals and promoting harmonised protection standards across Member States, involving existing consortia and civil society networks;

Removed17. Asks the Member States to apply strict oversight of spyware and surveillance markets and operations, and to repeal the export of licences for spyware whenever appropriate;

Added19. Calls on the Member States to implement EU legislation in a way that protects HRDs seeking shelter and asylum from authoritarian regimes, ensuring that HRDs in need receive effective protection, including by swiftly issuing humanitarian visas in urgent cases to individuals targeted by transnational repression, and to exercise particular caution with regard to rejecting resettlement requests by HRDs and deporting them to non-EU countries, where this may result in their being subjected to transnational repression;

Removed18. Calls on the Commission to enforce the Digital Services Act and ensure that social media platforms comply with human rights obligations and address TNR;

Added20. Calls for the EU and its Member States to respect their international obligations on persecuted HRDs’ right to seek asylum and stresses that the right to seek asylum is fundamental for the protection of people at risk of persecution for human rights activities under the Geneva Convention; calls on the Member States to protect individuals who have contacted the authorities to report credible cases of transnational repression, including by advising them to seek other forms of subsidiary protection if they have not already done so; commends the Member States that host HRDs, ensuring their safety and enabling them to continue their activities;

Added21. Calls on the Member States to make best use of their national policies and available margins to formulate a more coherent, coordinated and predictable visa policy for HRDs and other individuals targeted by transnational repression, in line with the HRD provisions in the revised EU Visa Policy Handbook;

Added22. Calls for support to be provided to HRDs in line with the Family Reunification Directive;

Added23. Expresses concern about the role played by the embassies of states involved in transnational repression; points to the heightened risk for HRDs in need of consular services when forced to engage with those embassies; calls on the Member States to increase pressure on embassies of countries linked with transnational repression hosted on their territories, and not to use their diplomatic outposts to engage in efforts to silence dissent abroad, in line with the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations;

AddedEnhancing coordinated monitoring and data collection

Added24. Calls on the EEAS and the Member States, in cooperation with the relevant institutions, such as Europol, to coordinate efforts and set up accessible information, data, tracking and reporting mechanisms to improve the documentation of cases of transnational repression on their territories and facilitate a rapid reaction and investigation where necessary; calls on the EEAS to enhance the network of focal points for targeted HRDs and individuals in EU delegations, who are tasked with raising cases with the authorities in the relevant capital city; believes that such mechanisms should be accessible to civil society, allowing for their input to be duly registered;

Added25. Calls on the Commission to establish a centralised mapping mechanism to identify, monitor and assess incidents and share alerts of transnational repression against HRDs located in the EU, which will help to identify gaps in EU policy, formulate adequate strategic responses and support coordinated action among Member States;

Added26. Calls on the Member States to codify transnational repression in their national legislation, with the aim of supporting government institutions in identifying and preventing transnational repression; calls on the Member States to establish national focal points within their governments for potential and actual victims of transnational repression and to provide a toolkit explaining how to report instances thereof;

Added27. Calls on the Member States, Europol and the EU Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) to provide training on transnational repression awareness, counterstrategies and specific risk assessment protocols to relevant government agencies, external service providers and their staff, especially cybersecurity, law enforcement and immigration officers and staff tasked with handling visa applications and reviewing extradition requests and other forms of legal cooperation with non-EU countries, with a focus on digital surveillance, retaliation risks and misuse of legal mechanisms;

AddedAddressing the risks posed by digital technologies as enablers of transnational repression

Added28. Calls for the EU and its Member States to recognise, prevent and tackle digital forms of transnational repression, including disinformation campaigns targeting HRDs, and to ensure that HRDs are protected against online harassment, intimidation and censorship, regardless of the origin of the service provider, the location of the digital infrastructure or the tools used; calls on the EU Member States to criminalise foreign intelligence activities targeting dissidents in exile as a form of digital transnational repression;

Added9. Asks the Member States to apply strict oversight of spyware and surveillance markets and operations, including by applying mandatory human rights due diligence and the EU Dual-Use Regulation for all EU-based technology exporters and to repeal the export of licences for spyware to countries with documented transnational repression and human rights violations, where there is a foreseeable risk that these tools will be used to silence or punish human rights advocacy or dissent; recalls the 2024 Commission Guidelines on the export of cyber-surveillance items, which aim to raise awareness of the risks associated with the misuse of cyber-surveillance technologies and provide exporters with practical tools to evaluate human rights situations;

Added30. Calls on the Commission to enforce the Digital Services Act and ensure that social media platforms comply with human rights obligations and address transnational repression; stresses the need for technology companies to identify and address potential human rights risks associated with their products, in line with applicable due diligence legislation and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights; urges the enforcement of mandatory human rights due diligence obligations for companies offering hosting, communication, surveillance and content distribution services, including requirements to identify, mitigate and prevent the misuse of their platforms or infrastructure to target HRDs;

Added31. Calls on the Member States to establish easily accessible and safe reporting mechanisms, designed to respect and protect user privacy, to enable HRDs living in exile or in diaspora communities to raise concerns about digital transnational repression with relevant government agencies; stresses the need to recognise the specific challenge of gender-based digital transnational repression and the particular consequences of this type of repression for women HRDs;

Added32. Calls for the EU and its Member States to ensure that private actors, particularly in the technology sector, are held accountable for their role in cases where they enable digital transnational repression; further calls for the publication of transparency reports and for the establishment of effective grievance mechanisms that are accessible to HRDs and other at-risk individuals;

Ensuring accountability and applying sanctions

Change 4

Changed19.33. Calls for the EU to hold states and regimes committing TNRtransnational repression accountable for human rights violations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights andRights, the European Convention on Human Rights, the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and to consider imposing targeted sanctions on those states and on perpetrators of transnational repression against HRDs; urges the EU to support victims of transnational repression in seeking redress through strategic litigation before the European Court of Human Rights;

Change 5

Removed20. Calls for the EU to increase funding for ProtectDefenders.eu, broaden its mandate to include HRDs at risk of TNR within the EU, and increase funding for civil society organisations active in the protection of HRDs at risk;

Added34. Denounces the fact that transnational repression also takes place on EU Member State soil and in some cases with Member State complicity in transnational repression; notes that transnational repression is also enabled through collaboration between governments;

Removed21. Calls on the Commission to further collaborate with Interpol and the United Nations to put an end to the abusive, politically motivated use of red notices, blue notices, diffusions and extradition requests; calls for Europol’s mandate to include TNR and the assessment of related incidents and Interpol notices targeting HRDs;

Added35. Stresses that the EU and its Member States must uphold human rights due diligence in their engagements with governments known to engage in or enable transnational repression against HRDs;

Removed22. Calls for the EU and its Member States to use all available tools to protect HRDs and reinforce national sovereignty and democratic values, including sanctions under the EU global human rights sanctions regimes, visa bans and the expulsion of diplomats;

Added36. Calls for the EU to increase funding for ProtectDefenders.eu, broaden its mandate to include HRDs at risk of transnational repression within the EU and increase funding for civil society organisations active in the protection of HRDs and individuals at risk;

Removed23. Calls for the EU and the EEAS to intensify diplomatic relations, including through EU delegations, to prevent and deter transnational repression tactics by non-EU countries, and to highlight these incidents via public statements;

Added37. Calls on the Commission to proactively engage and further collaborate with Interpol and the UN, including by developing a common security framework for transnational repression in order to put an end to the abusive and politically motivated use of red notices, blue notices, diffusions and extradition requests; calls for Europol’s mandate to include transnational repression and the assessment of related incidents and Interpol notices targeting HRDs and other individuals; calls on the Member States to exercise the utmost caution when considering requests for arrest and extradition from regimes that have in the past abused red notices;

Added38. Calls for the EU and its Member States to use all available tools to protect HRDs and targeted individuals and reinforce national sovereignty and democratic values, including sanctions under the EU global human rights sanctions regime (EU GHRSR/EU Magnitsky Act), visa bans and the expulsion of diplomats known to have engaged in acts of transnational repression; urges the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the Member States to include transnational repression as a sanctionable category under the EU GHRSR and to list individuals found to be perpetrators of transnational repression; warns that failure to prevent and respond to transnational repression risks undermining the EU’s credibility as a safe haven for those fleeing persecution and defending human rights;

Added39. Calls for the EU, its Member States, the Commission and the EEAS to mobilise and coordinate all their instruments to address transnational repression, and intensify diplomatic relations, including through EU delegations, to prevent and deter transnational repression tactics by non-EU countries and to highlight these incidents via public statements, thus increasing public awareness; calls for enhanced coordination with like-minded partner countries, in the context of the G7 and other relevant international forums;

°

° °

40. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Changes between AFET-PR-774242 and A-10-2025-0206”. Text, 23 October 2025. from AFET-PR-774242, to A-10-2025-0206, reference 2025/2048(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-PR-774242/compare/A-10-2025-0206?all=1&part=2 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-10-23,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between AFET-PR-774242 and A-10-2025-0206}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-PR-774242/compare/A-10-2025-0206?all=1&part=2}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFET-PR-774242/compare/A-10-2025-0206?all=1&part=2},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from AFET-PR-774242, to A-10-2025-0206, reference 2025/2048(INI). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}