Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report

AFCO-PR-774293 → A-10-2025-0177

From
AFCO-PR-774293 report parliamentary committee draft of 6 Jun 2025
To
A-10-2025-0177 Plenary report of 2 Oct 2025
Changes
22 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+46 added · −23 removed · 12 changed
More facts (3)
Title (from)
on the institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations
Title (to)
on the institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

The report shifts emphasis from general geopolitical benefits to merit-based accession and economic convergence, adding detailed recitals on GDP growth and convergence.2 It drops calls for intergovernmental cooperation outside the Treaties and instead stresses Treaty-based reforms, including QMV and Article 7 changes.361218 It adds new paragraphs on MFF governance, own resources, and the role of accession countries' parliaments, while removing some previous calls.1416 It rephrases several paragraphs on institutional composition and decision-making, adding references to recent resolutions and Treaty articles.891011 The other changes are formal or wording: minor rephrasing and updates to align with new positions.1457

The notes class 11 changes as substance, 0 as formal, 11 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 3 of 3: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Change 22

AddedEXPLANATORY STATEMENT

AddedThe report sets forward Parliament’s position on the reforms of the institutional framework of the Union and a pathway towards the future functioning of an enlarged EU.

AddedThe point of departure of the report is to create a more powerful, efficient, competitive and democratic Union based on the principle of FREE POLITICAL choice, deepening EU’s integration in order to benefit for the challenges of the 21st century. The institutional framework of the Union requires modification to be fit to response to challenges of institutional and political nature, and the future enlargements are the catalyst for this change.

AddedThe first part of the report shows how the cost of “no reforms” – in the institutional architecture and decision-making for the enlarged Union of more than 30 Member States – is too high and risky. Therefore, the question is not whether to enlarge or not, but rather how to make the Union and its Member States benefit the most from the next enlargement. The challenges are known and well documented, the need for reform rather consensual, which makes this imperative all the more urgent.

AddedThe second part of the report explores ways – within and outside the Treaty framework – to help the enlarged Union:

Added• be more efficient (by reforming the composition and functioning of the main EU institutions: the Parliament, the Council and the Commission)

Added• act faster in its decision-making (due to lifting of vetoes)

Added• be more powerful (by creating a European defence system and boost investments)

Added• and be more democratic and accountable (by further empowering the Parliament as the only directly elected EU institutions, as well as by reforming of the European electoral law).

AddedThe last part of the report offers reflections about the possible ways of implementing the pre-enlargement institutional reforms. These consist of the following:

Added• flexibilities offered by the current Treaties: passerelle clauses, enhanced cooperation, constructive abstentions, permanent structured cooperation and opt-out mechanisms

Added• targeted key Treaty amendments, in line with proposals for institutional reforms outlined in the Parliament resolution of 22 November 2023 on proposals of the European Parliament for the amendment of the Treaties.

AddedThe report provides a timely contribution to the long-awaited Commission’s pre-enlargement policy reviews, to the Council Presidency progress report on the future of Europe as well as to the conclusions of the European Council on the same subject.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Changes between AFCO-PR-774293 and A-10-2025-0177”. Text, 2 October 2025. from AFCO-PR-774293, to A-10-2025-0177, reference 2025/2041(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFCO-PR-774293/compare/A-10-2025-0177?all=1&part=3 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-10-02,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between AFCO-PR-774293 and A-10-2025-0177}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-02},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFCO-PR-774293/compare/A-10-2025-0177?all=1&part=3}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/AFCO-PR-774293/compare/A-10-2025-0177?all=1&part=3},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from AFCO-PR-774293, to A-10-2025-0177, reference 2025/2041(INI). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}