Text · Comparison of two versions
Changes from plenary report to adopted text
A-10-2025-0244 → TA-10-2025-0337
- From
- A-10-2025-0244 Plenary report of 4 Dec 2025
- To
- TA-10-2025-0337 Adopted text of 17 Dec 2025
- Changes
- 8 changes to the text
- Paragraphs
- +4 added · −15 removed · 9 changed
More facts (3)
- Dossier
- 2025/2080(INL)
- Title (from)
- with recommendations to the Commission on digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work
- Title (to)
- Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Every difference
The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.
Part 4 of 5: Paragraphs 152–164
13 unchanged paragraphs
Member States should ensure tailored guidance and dedicated support mechanisms to assist SMEs in understanding and effectively implementing any obligations related to automated monitoring and automated decision-making systems.
Recommendation 9
Enforcement
The proposal should provide that the Commission, Member States, their national competent authorities and the social partners cooperate, share best practices in order to build capacities, and ensure effective enforcement.
The proposal should ensure that workers exercising their rights are protected against adverse treatment, retaliation and dismissal and have access to evidence in administrative and judicial proceedings.
Recommendation 10
Supervision
The proposal should ensure that data protection authorities established under the General Data Protection Regulation also monitor the application of its provisions in relation to data processing in employment contexts, in cooperation with national labour authorities and other competent authorities.
Recommendation 11
Non-Regression and More Favourable Provisions
The rules and safeguards resulting from these recommendations should provide a level of protection that is at least equivalent to that provided by existing Union law, including the Platform Work Directive, the Artificial Intelligence Act, the Digital Services Act, and the General Data Protection Regulation.
The proposal should not constitute valid grounds for reducing the general level of protection already afforded to workers within Member States.
The proposal should ensure that Member States and social partners remain free to introduce or maintain more favourable provisions.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0244/compare/TA-10-2025-0337?all=1&part=4
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 29 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2025). “Changes between A-10-2025-0244 and TA-10-2025-0337”. Text, 17 December 2025. from A-10-2025-0244, to TA-10-2025-0337, reference 2025/2080(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0244/compare/TA-10-2025-0337?all=1&part=4 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-12-17,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Changes between A-10-2025-0244 and TA-10-2025-0337}},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-12-17},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0244/compare/TA-10-2025-0337?all=1&part=4}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0244/compare/TA-10-2025-0337?all=1&part=4},
urldate = {2026-09-29},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. from A-10-2025-0244, to TA-10-2025-0337, reference 2025/2080(INL). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}