Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-10-2025-0244 → TA-10-2025-0337

From: A-10-2025-0244 Plenary report of 4 Dec 2025
To: TA-10-2025-0337 Adopted text of 17 Dec 2025
Changes: 8 changes to the text
Paragraphs: +4 added · −15 removed · 9 changed

More facts (3)

Dossier: 2025/2080(INL)
Title (from): with recommendations to the Commission on digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work
Title (to): Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work

Dossier: 2025/2080(INL)
Title (from): with recommendations to the Commission on digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work
Title (to): Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work

What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

The versions differ only in formal and wording changes: percentage formatting, punctuation, regulation citation, and removal of the word 'legislative' and an amendment reference.1 2 3 4

The notes class 0 changes as substance, 6 as formal, 2 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Changes that matter, 8

Changes to the text in document order — the ones the change notes describe. Cover page, renumbering and punctuation-only edits are left out (see “Every difference”); changes to citations and references stay in and are marked as formal in the notes.

Change 1

ChangedB. whereas the digital transition at the workplace should be driven by the precautionary and ethics-by-default principles and steered in a manner that protects and promotes human dignity, enhances productivity, efficiency, innovation, and the competitiveness of the European economy and the common market in a manner that profits to all; whereas this transition must equally uphold the principles of social progress and protection of workers’ rights, ensuring that it contributes to quality employment, better working conditions, empowerment and well-being of all workers while supporting a level playing field in the internal market, innovation and the competitiveness of businesses; and whereas AI is still an evolving technology and as such EU companies still have an opportunity to take a leading position in some segments; whereas failure to deploy AI-systems to reinforce EU competitiveness could be detrimental to future growth, investment and innovation; whereas ~~64%~~64 % of SMEs in the European Single Market consider regulatory obstacles or administrative burdens to be the biggest problem at present;

Note on change 1 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Fixes the percentage formatting from '64%' to '64 %' and from '35%' to '35 %'.

Report a problem

Change 2

ChangedM. whereas estimates vary, that between one-quarter and 80 % of companies in the Union use at least one form of algorithmic management; whereas the uptake of algorithmic management is likely to grow significantly in the coming years; whereas 26,5 % of workers in the EU have their work performance monitored by ‘a computer programme’, with a higher prevalence in large companies; whereas 27,4 % of workers gets tasks allocated via a computer system; whereas ~~35%~~35 % of European companies use algorithmic management systems for evaluation; whereas comprehensive and cooperative approach, together with social dialogue, is needed to establish a level playing field for responsible AI and algorithmic management in the workplace;

Note on change 2 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Fixes the percentage formatting from '35%' to '35 %'.

Report a problem

Change 3

Changed18. Underlines that personal data of persons performing work can be aggregated to a collective data base that could be processed by algorithms, therefore requiring data protection at the collective level as ~~well.~~well;

Note on change 3 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Changes the punctuation at the end of the sentence from a period to a semicolon.

Report a problem

Change 4

Changed22. Recalls that the existing Union acquis constitutes an important building block in regulating algorithmic management and the use of AI in the workplace; welcomes in this regard, the Platform Work Directive, which introduces, inter alia, rules on transparency, data protection, human oversight and review, information and consultation and health and safety in sectors where such technologies are increasingly shaping decisions on work, and the Artificial Intelligence Act and recalls Regulation (EU) 2016/679; stresses, however, that despite this legislative framework, a number of gaps remain as regards workers’ protection, rights and working conditions regarding the use of such tools in the workplace including respect of personal data and privacy, work-life balance and the right to disconnect; highlights that the Platform Work Directive’s provisions on algorithmic management (in particular workers’ rights to transparency, human review, worker information and consultation and OSH) only apply to persons performing platform work leaving other workers increasingly subject to algorithmic management less protected; underlines the need to ensure equal treatment of all workers and that future initiatives are coherent with the protective framework established by the Platform Work Directive;

Note on change 4 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds the abbreviation '(EU)' before the regulation number 2016/679.

Report a problem

Change 5

Changed27. Calls on the Commission to carry out an impact assessment complemented by a Competitiveness and SME test and submit on the basis of Articles 153(2), point (b), in conjunction with Article 153(1), point (b), and Article 16(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and of the result of the aforementioned steps, a ~~legislative~~ proposal on algorithmic management in the workplace, following the recommendations set out in the Annex hereto, which would address the remaining gaps in existing legislation, avoid creation of overlapping legal instruments and improve harmonisation of the internal market;

Note on change 5 · wording only Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Removes the word 'legislative' before 'proposal' in two places.

Report a problem

Change 6

Changed~~ANNEX TO THE MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION:~~ RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO THE CONTENT OF THE PROPOSAL REQUESTED

Note on change 6 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Removes the heading 'ANNEX TO THE MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION:' from the annex title.

Report a problem

Change 7 under “RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO THE CONTENT OF THE PROPOSAL REQUESTED”

ChangedThe European Parliament considers that, if the Commission, after conducting an impact assessment, complemented by a Competitiveness and SME Test, submits a ~~legislative~~ proposal on algorithmic management in the workplace, the following recommendations should be incorporated:

Note on change 7 · wording only Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Removes the word 'legislative' before 'proposal' in the annex introduction.

Report a problem

Change 8 under “RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO THE CONTENT OF THE PROPOSAL REQUESTED”

Changed~~(Ex AM E (Or.~~ The proposal should provide for the following definition:

Note on change 8 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Removes the amendment reference '(Ex AM E (Or. en))' from the annex text.

Report a problem

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0244/compare/TA-10-2025-0337
Data source: European Parliament Open Data
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Changes between A-10-2025-0244 and TA-10-2025-0337”. Text, 17 December 2025. from A-10-2025-0244, to TA-10-2025-0337, reference 2025/2080(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0244/compare/TA-10-2025-0337 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-text-2025-12-17,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-10-2025-0244 and TA-10-2025-0337}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0244/compare/TA-10-2025-0337}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0244/compare/TA-10-2025-0337},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-10-2025-0244, to TA-10-2025-0337, reference 2025/2080(INL). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}