Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-10-2025-0224 → TA-10-2025-0309

From: A-10-2025-0224 Plenary report of 11 Nov 2025
To: TA-10-2025-0309 Adopted text of 27 Nov 2025
Changes: 6 changes to the text
Paragraphs: +4 added · −10 removed · 12 changed

More facts (3)

Dossier: 2025/2042(INI)
Title (from): on the application of the Treaty provisions related to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and the role of national parliaments in the EU legislative process
Title (to): Application of the Treaty provisions related to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and the role of national parliaments in the EU legislative process

Dossier: 2025/2042(INI)
Title (from): on the application of the Treaty provisions related to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and the role of national parliaments in the EU legislative process
Title (to): Application of the Treaty provisions related to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and the role of national parliaments in the EU legislative process

Cite Link to this page

What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

The versions differ only in formal points: footnote markers are removed and punctuation adjusted.1 2 3 4

The notes class 0 changes as substance, 6 as formal, 0 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Changes that matter, 6

Changes to the text in document order — the ones the change notes describe. Cover page, renumbering and punctuation-only edits are left out (see “Every difference”); changes to citations and references stay in and are marked as formal in the notes.

Change 1

ChangedG. whereas only the first of the three yellow card procedures led to the withdrawal of a proposal for a ~~regulation10,~~regulation, the second led to enhanced cooperation between 20 Member States instead of unanimous ~~implementation11,~~implementation, and the third had no effect, while 14 reasoned opinions have been submitted by parliaments in 11 Member ~~States12;~~States;

Note on change 1 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Removes footnote markers and adjusts punctuation in recital G.

Report a problem

Change 2

Changed8. Notes the concerns expressed unanimously by the French Senate’s European Affairs ~~Committee13~~Committee regarding the weak legal foundation for certain EU legislative initiatives, the increasing tendency to favour regulations over directives, and the excessive use of implementing or delegated acts;

Note on change 2 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Removes footnote marker in paragraph 8.

Report a problem

Change 3

Changed13. Welcomes the creation of informal procedures to enhance coordination between the Commission, the European Parliament and national parliaments, such as the political dialogue, the rapporteurs’ dialogue and the website entitled ‘National Parliament opinions and Commission ~~replies’14;~~replies’; urges the Commission to explore avenues to further improve consultation with national parliaments on subsidiarity concerns, for example by establishing a ‘single subsidiarity hub’ (SSH) based on the IPEX platform, where reasoned opinions, as well as, for example, contributions, opinions of the European Committee of the Regions, answers from the Commission and Parliament resolutions, would be collected and freely accessible; considers that an SSH would be a suitable place for the Member States to request that the Commission propose supporting or coordinating legislation in an area of the Member States’ exclusive competence;

Note on change 3 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Removes footnote marker in paragraph 13.

Report a problem

Change 4

Changed22. Welcomes the contributions of the LXXII Plenary Meeting of the Conference of Parliamentary Committees for Union Affairs of Parliaments of the European Union ~~(COSAC)15,~~(COSAC), which recommended strengthening the subsidiarity review by the national parliaments by extending the eight-week deadline for submitting opinions to 10 weeks and through lowering the threshold for triggering the yellow card to one quarter of the votes cast;

Note on change 4 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Removes footnote marker in paragraph 22.

Report a problem

Change 5

Changed36. Takes note of the CJEU’s interpretation that not taking into account the particular situation of one or more of the Member States in the assessment of a legislative initiative does not constitute a violation of the principle of ~~proportionality16;~~proportionality; insists that the individual particularities of the Member States are relevant for the purpose of drafting legislation for the EU as a whole;

Note on change 5 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Removes footnote marker in paragraph 36.

Report a problem

Change 6

Changed37. Expresses concern about the CJEU’s judgment stating that the failure to carry out an impact assessment cannot be regarded as a breach of the principle of ~~proportionality17;~~proportionality; calls on the Commission to carry out impact assessments without exception and ensure that when the scope of the legislative proposal changes, the Commission comes forward with a new impact assessment;

Note on change 6 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Removes footnote marker in paragraph 37.

Report a problem

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0224/compare/TA-10-2025-0309
Data source: European Parliament Open Data
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Changes between A-10-2025-0224 and TA-10-2025-0309”. Text, 27 November 2025. from A-10-2025-0224, to TA-10-2025-0309, reference 2025/2042(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0224/compare/TA-10-2025-0309 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-text-2025-11-27,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-10-2025-0224 and TA-10-2025-0309}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-27},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0224/compare/TA-10-2025-0309}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0224/compare/TA-10-2025-0309},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-10-2025-0224, to TA-10-2025-0309, reference 2025/2042(INI). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}