Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from plenary report to adopted text

A-10-2025-0137 → TA-10-2025-0186

From
A-10-2025-0137 Plenary report of 9 Jul 2025
To
TA-10-2025-0186 Adopted text of 10 Sept 2025
Changes
5 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+6 added · −11 removed · 7 changed
More facts (3)
Title (from)
on the role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transition
Title (to)
Role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transition
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Changes the stance on the Just Transition Fund: now regrets the lack of a stand-alone proposal and calls for its continuation.4 Other changes are formal: corrected directive number, decimal separators, and punctuation.235

The notes class 1 change as substance, 3 as formal, 1 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Changes that matter, 5

Changes to the text in document order — the ones the change notes describe. Cover page, renumbering and punctuation-only edits are left out (see “Every difference”); changes to citations and references stay in and are marked as formal in the notes.

Change 1

RemovedD. whereas many of the poorest and most vulnerable regions are located in the eastern part of the EU; whereas the war in Ukraine has an additional negative impact on these regions;E. whereas the physical disconnection and isolation of islands from the mainland constitutes a permanent structural disadvantage that affects multiple aspects of economic and social life, including access to the labour market, education, healthcare, mobility and public services; whereas the limited territory of islands significantly restricts opportunities for professional upskilling and reskilling, thereby limiting workers’ ability to adapt to structural changes or sectoral shifts, such as those driven by the green and digital transitions; whereas, in many cases, this lack of alternatives forces workers to leave their home regions in order to access employment opportunities elsewhere, effectively undermining their ‘right to stay’ and contributing to depopulation and brain drain in insular territories;

AddedD. whereas many of the poorest and most vulnerable regions are located in the eastern part of the EU; whereas the war in Ukraine has an additional negative impact on these regions;

AddedE. whereas the physical disconnection and isolation of islands from the mainland constitutes a permanent structural disadvantage that affects multiple aspects of economic and social life, including access to the labour market, education, healthcare, mobility and public services; whereas the limited territory of islands significantly restricts opportunities for professional upskilling and reskilling, thereby limiting workers’ ability to adapt to structural changes or sectoral shifts, such as those driven by the green and digital transitions; whereas, in many cases, this lack of alternatives forces workers to leave their home regions in order to access employment opportunities elsewhere, effectively undermining their ‘right to stay’ and contributing to depopulation and brain drain in insular territories;

AI: Note on change 1 · wording only Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Moves recitals D and E to a different position without changing their content.

Report a problem

Change 2

ChangedK. whereas tourism is a key sector of the EU’s economy, directly and indirectly contributing to over 10 % of the EU’s GDP, and plays a vital role in enhancing competitiveness, social well-being and sustainable job creation, particularly in regions heavily reliant on tourism; whereas tourism has the potential to contribute significantly to territorial cohesion, particularly in remote, rural, coastal, outermost and island regions, and can support economic diversification and just transition in areas facing structural challenges, population decline, or dependency on carbon-intensive industries; whereas the EU’s tourism industry, largely composed of 2.32,3 million small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), employs approximately 12.312,3 million people and represents a major economic activity with strong multiplier effects across various sectors; whereas cohesion policy should support sustainable tourism strategies as part of the just transition, fostering resilience, innovation and green and digital transformation in the tourism sector, while promoting inclusive growth and preserving cultural and natural heritage;

AI: Note on change 2 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Updates decimal separators in numbers from periods to commas, aligning with EU style.

Report a problem

Change 3

Changed45. Calls for special consideration to be given to the need to promote electricity connections, to increasing grid hosting capacity and to strengthening energy storage systems, as necessary components of an effective energy transition; calls on the Commission to encourage the Member States to fully implement the provisions of Directive (EU) 2019/9942019/944 related to citizen energy communities, providing specific measures to protect vulnerable households from energy poverty in JTF regions; believes, in this context, that support should be given to local community-led green infrastructure and renewable energy projects, such as solar, wind and hydropower installations, as well as sustainable transportation, which stimulate local economies, offering great potential for the creation of local jobs in construction, engineering, maintenance and related industries;

AI: Note on change 3 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Corrects the directive number from 2019/994 to 2019/944.

Report a problem

Change 4

Changed49. CallsRegrets onthat the Commission tohas proposenot proposed a newstand-alone fund,Just Transition Fund (JTF) in its recent proposals on the future multiannual financial framework (MFF); calls therefore for the continuation of the JTF through a JTF ‘II’, for the post-2027 programming period so as to provide direct support for households and communities to transition, and to enable an intervention capacity commensurate with the scale of the socio-economicsocio-economic, employment, demographic and environmental impacts of the transition towards the EU’s 2030 energy targets; stresses that this fund should operate under shared management and partnership principles, within the framework of cohesion policy, and stresses that it should have its own predictable budget allocation, ensuring its autonomy from extraordinary crisis response instruments, such as NextGenerationEU;

AI: Note on change 4 · substance Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Changes the call for a new fund to regret that the Commission did not propose a stand-alone JTF, and calls for its continuation.

Report a problem

Change 5

Changed5252. Believes that the good governance framework is key in implementing the just transition; underlines that local and regional authorities play a pivotal role in ensuring the effective design, implementation and monitoring of EU programmes, given their proximity to citizens and deep understanding of territorial needs; highlights the importance of upholding the partnership principle and the European code of conduct on partnership, and of emphasising the place-based approach, to ensure the full participation of local and regional authorities, social partners and civil society organisations in the governance, selection and monitoring of funded projects, in line with the multilevel governance principle laid down in Regulation (EU) 2021/1060;

AI: Note on change 5 · formal Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Adds a period after the paragraph number, a typographical correction.

Report a problem

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Changes between A-10-2025-0137 and TA-10-2025-0186”. Text, 10 September 2025. from A-10-2025-0137, to TA-10-2025-0186, reference 2024/2121(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0137/compare/TA-10-2025-0186 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-09-10,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between A-10-2025-0137 and TA-10-2025-0186}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0137/compare/TA-10-2025-0186}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2025-0137/compare/TA-10-2025-0186},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from A-10-2025-0137, to TA-10-2025-0186, reference 2024/2121(INI). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}