Skip to content

Sitting · Plenary

Wednesday 22 June 2022

Date
Wednesday 22 June 2022
Part-session
unknown
Decisions
0 decisions
Votes
122 votes · 122 roll calls
More facts (4)
Voting time
15:42–16:33
Amendments
118
Previous sitting
Thursday 9 June 2022
More

Decisions, 0

Numbered as on the sitting’s record, by kind of decision.

No decision was voted on this day.

All votes, 0

Every vote of the day recorded by name. A decision can have many votes.

No vote of this kind on this day.

Open these votes in the register to filter them further.

Other votes, 122

Votes the official records do not link to any decision of the day.

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 230 to Article 1, paragraph 3 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 1, § 3 – Am 230 Roll call138 for, 480 against, 7 abstained
2Amendment 660 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 5 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3g – § 1 – Am 660 Roll call131 for, 494 against, 5 abstained
3Amendment 661 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 5 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3g – after § 2 – Am 661 Roll call192 for, 423 against, 7 abstained
4Amendment 499 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3ga – § 1 – Am 499 Roll call455 for, 166 against, 6 abstained
5Amendment 667 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC after Article 3ga – Am 667 Roll call159 for, 458 against, 13 abstained
Show the other 117 votesShow the other 117 votes
Votes not linked to a decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
6Amendment 668 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC after Article 3ga – Am 668 Roll call174 for, 450 against, 7 abstained
7Amendment 633 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – after point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – § 3 – sub§ 2 – Am 633 Roll call184 for, 437 against, 8 abstained
8Amendment 634 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – after point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – § 3 – sub§ 2 – Am 634 Roll call146 for, 472 against, 9 abstained
9Amendment 671 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point a – point i Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1 – sub§ 2a – Am 671D Roll call147 for, 474 against, 7 abstained
10Amendment 636 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b – point ii Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 2 – sub§ 3 – point d – Am 636 Roll call122 for, 494 against, 13 abstained
11Amendment 532 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b – point ii Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 2 – sub§ 3 – point d – Am 532 Roll call453 for, 152 against, 24 abstained
12Amendment 672 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b – point ii Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 2 – sub§ 3 – point d – Am 672 Roll call82 for, 533 against, 13 abstained
13Amendment 673 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – after point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 5a – Am 673 Roll call143 for, 482 against, 5 abstained
14Amendment 637 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point e – introductory part Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 6 – Am 637D Roll call126 for, 499 against, 6 abstained
15Amendment 638 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point g Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 8 – after § 3 – Am 638 Roll call124 for, 500 against, 4 abstained
16Amendment 650 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point g Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 8 – § 4 – Am 650 Roll call114 for, 477 against, 42 abstained
17Separate vote on Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – after point 12 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10b – Ams 639 640D 641D Roll call116 for, 503 against, 8 abstained
18Amendment 652 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – after point 19 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 29a – Am 652 Roll call150 for, 472 against, 10 abstained
19Amendments 674 + 653 (voted as one) to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 21 Directive 2003/87/EC Chapter IVa – Am 674D= 653D= Roll call189 for, 411 against, 22 abstained
20Amendment 577 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 21 Directive 2003/87/EC Chapter IVa – Am 577 Roll call416 for, 182 against, 28 abstained
21Amendment 677 to Article 1 — part 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – § 3 – Am 677/1 Roll call490 for, 130 against, 13 abstained
22Amendment 678 to Article 1 — part 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1a – sub§ 2 – Am 678/1 Roll call513 for, 106 against, 14 abstained
23Amendment 679 to Article 1 — part 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1 – after sub§ 2b – Am 679/1 Roll call486 for, 128 against, 18 abstained
24Amendment 677 to Article 1 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – § 3 – Am 677/2 Roll call446 for, 167 against, 13 abstained
25Amendment 678 to Article 1 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1a – sub§ 2 – Am 678/2 Roll call468 for, 127 against, 17 abstained
26Amendment 679 to Article 1 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1 – after sub§ 2b – Am 679/2 Roll call512 for, 98 against, 13 abstained
27Amendment 677 to Article 1 — part 3 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – § 3 – Am 677/3 Roll call485 for, 82 against, 59 abstained
28Amendment 679 to Article 1 — part 3 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1 – after sub§ 2b – Am 679/3 Roll call406 for, 186 against, 26 abstained
29Amendment 677 to Article 1 — part 4 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – § 3 – Am 677/4 Roll call366 for, 183 against, 59 abstained
30Amendment 679 to Article 1 — part 4 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1 – after sub§ 2b – Am 679/4 Roll call313 for, 291 against, 19 abstained
31Amendment 677 to Article 1 — part 5 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – § 3 – Am 677/5 Roll call478 for, 125 against, 17 abstained
32Amendment 677 to Article 1 — part 6 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – § 3 – Am 677/6 Roll call363 for, 239 against, 17 abstained
33Amendment 643 to Article 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 2 – § 1 – point 1 – point c Decision (EU) 2015/1814 Article 1 – § 5 – sub§ 1 – Am 643 Roll call126 for, 502 against, 4 abstained
34Amendment 644 to Article 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 2 – § 1 – point 1 – point c Decision (EU) 2015/1814 Article 1 – § 5a – Am 644 Roll call124 for, 501 against, 5 abstained
35Amendment 645 to Article 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 2 – § 1 – after point 1 – point c Decision (EU) 2015/1814 Article 1 – § 6 – Am 645 Roll call122 for, 496 against, 7 abstained
36Amendment 250, adding text after Article 5 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Article 5 – Am 250 Roll call124 for, 478 against, 22 abstained
37Amendment 130, adding text after Article 24 — part 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Article 24 – Am 130/1 Roll call453 for, 157 against, 14 abstained
38Amendment 130, adding text after Article 24 — part 2 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Article 24 – Am 130/2 Roll call488 for, 133 against, 3 abstained
39Amendments 207 + 252 (voted as one) to Article 30, paragraph 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 30, § 1 – Am 207= 252= Roll call131 for, 482 against, 9 abstained
40Amendment 260 to Article 30, paragraph 2 — part 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 30, § 2 – Am 260/1 Roll call380 for, 236 against, 8 abstained
41Amendment 260 to Article 30, paragraph 2 — part 2 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 30, § 2 – Am 260/2 Roll call433 for, 165 against, 21 abstained
42Amendment 258 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 258 Roll call138 for, 469 against, 16 abstained
43Amendment 191 to Article 31, after paragraph 2 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 2 – Am 191 Roll call37 for, 583 against, 4 abstained
44Amendments 212 + 257 (voted as one) to Article 31, paragraph 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, § 1 – Am 212= 257= Roll call128 for, 484 against, 10 abstained
45Amendment 261 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 261/1 Roll call469 for, 153 against, 4 abstained
46Amendment 262 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 262/1 Roll call449 for, 161 against, 14 abstained
47Amendment 261 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 2 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 261/2 Roll call490 for, 127 against, 6 abstained
48Amendment 262 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 2 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 262/2 Roll call540 for, 60 against, 8 abstained
49Amendment 261 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 3 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 261/3 Roll call376 for, 240 against, 7 abstained
50Amendment 262 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 3 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 262/3 Roll call436 for, 178 against, 9 abstained
51Amendment 262 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 4 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 262/4 Roll call340 for, 263 against, 18 abstained
52Amendment 237 to Article 36, paragraph 3, after point d A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, after point d – Am 237 Roll call122 for, 493 against, 7 abstained
53Amendment 264 to Article 36, paragraph 3, point c A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, point c – Am 264 Roll call491 for, 119 against, 12 abstained
54Amendment 215 to Article 36, paragraph 3, before point a A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, before point a – Am 215 Roll call119 for, 494 against, 11 abstained
55Amendments 198 + 216 + 263 (voted as one) to Article 36, paragraph 3, point a A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, point a – Am 198= 216= 263= Roll call498 for, 117 against, 9 abstained
56Amendments 199 + 217 (voted as one) to Article 36, paragraph 3, point b A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, point b – Am 199= 217= Roll call485 for, 119 against, 19 abstained
57Amendments 200 + 218 + 265 (voted as one) to Article 36, paragraph 3, point d A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, point d – Am 200= 218= 265= Roll call493 for, 122 against, 9 abstained
58Amendment 219 to Article 36, paragraph 3, after point d A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, after point d – Am 219 Roll call121 for, 479 against, 21 abstained
59Amendment 221 to recital 3 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 3 – Am 221 Roll call127 for, 481 against, 11 abstained
60Amendment 629 to recital 7 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 7 – Am 629 Roll call55 for, 484 against, 92 abstained
61Amendment 8 to recital 10 — part 3 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 10 – Am 8/3 Roll call318 for, 296 against, 9 abstained
62Amendment 186, adding text after Recital 12 — part 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Recital 12 – Am 186/1 Roll call120 for, 493 against, 6 abstained
63Amendment 658 to recital 29 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 29 – Am 658D Roll call156 for, 470 against, 5 abstained
64Amendment 451 to recital 29 — part 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 29 – Am 451/1 Roll call480 for, 137 against, 14 abstained
65Amendment 451 to recital 29 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 29 – Am 451/2 Roll call417 for, 197 against, 10 abstained
66Amendment 451 to recital 29 — part 3 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 29 – Am 451/3 Roll call348 for, 271 against, 12 abstained
67Amendment 676 to recital 30 — part 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 30 – Am 676/1 Roll call459 for, 164 against, 6 abstained
68Amendment 676 to recital 30 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 30 – Am 676/2 Roll call320 for, 276 against, 21 abstained
69Amendment 455 to recital 31 — part 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 31 – Am 455/1 Roll call490 for, 122 against, 10 abstained
70Amendment 455 to recital 31 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 31 – Am 455/2 Roll call462 for, 151 against, 16 abstained
71Amendment 33 to recital 50 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 50 – Am 33 Roll call121 for, 496 against, 7 abstained
72Amendments 203 + 224 (voted as one), adding text after Recital 50 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Recital 50 – Am 203= 224= Roll call139 for, 476 against, 4 abstained
73Amendment 194, adding text after Recital 51 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Recital 51 – Am 194 Roll call287 for, 330 against, 5 abstained
74Amendments 205 + 226 (voted as one), adding text after Recital 52 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Recital 52 – Am 205= 226= Roll call120 for, 470 against, 28 abstained
75Amendment 40 to recital 55 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 55 – Am 40 Roll call480 for, 137 against, 5 abstained
76Amendment 187 to recital 55 — part 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 55 – Am 187/1 Roll call120 for, 493 against, 6 abstained
77Amendment 187 to recital 55 — part 2 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 55 – Am 187/2 Roll call141 for, 466 against, 8 abstained
78Amendment 188, adding text after Recital 55 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Recital 55 – Am 188 Roll call115 for, 498 against, 4 abstained
79Amendment 220 Carbon border adjustment mechanism – A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Proposal to reject the Commission proposal – Am 220 Roll call69 for, 506 against, 48 abstained
80Amendment 14 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 14 Roll call544 for, 78 against, 5 abstained
81Amendment 20 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 20 Roll call490 for, 129 against, 4 abstained
82Amendment 25 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 25D Roll call479 for, 134 against, 10 abstained
83Amendment 177 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 177 Roll call472 for, 145 against, 8 abstained
84Amendment 178 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 178 Roll call475 for, 140 against, 9 abstained
85Amendment 179 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 179 Roll call487 for, 128 against, 8 abstained
86Amendment 47 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 47 Roll call464 for, 150 against, 8 abstained
87Amendment 675 Revision of the EU Emissions Trading System – A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Proposal to reject the Commission proposal – Am 675 Roll call114 for, 499 against, 12 abstained
88Amendment 456 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 456 Roll call450 for, 169 against, 13 abstained
89Amendment 463 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 463 Roll call441 for, 182 against, 7 abstained
90Amendment 508 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 508 Roll call436 for, 176 against, 14 abstained
91Amendment 531 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 531 Roll call438 for, 180 against, 14 abstained
92Amendment 559 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 559 Roll call415 for, 199 against, 17 abstained
93Amendment 561 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 561 Roll call499 for, 97 against, 35 abstained
94Amendment 570 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 570 Roll call419 for, 202 against, 11 abstained
95Amendment 620 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 620 Roll call360 for, 264 against, 7 abstained
96Amendment 622 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 622 Roll call460 for, 158 against, 13 abstained
97Amendment 623 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 623 Roll call444 for, 168 against, 12 abstained
98Amendment 446 — part 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 446/1 Roll call576 for, 52 against, 4 abstained
99Amendment 509 — part 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 509/1 Roll call545 for, 56 against, 30 abstained
100Amendment 547 — part 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 547/1 Roll call566 for, 59 against, 5 abstained
101Amendment 24 — part 2 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 24/2 Roll call477 for, 140 against, 9 abstained
102Amendment 446 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 446/2 Roll call484 for, 127 against, 8 abstained
103Amendment 462 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 462/2 Roll call460 for, 139 against, 34 abstained
104Amendment 506 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 506/rev/2 Roll call439 for, 182 against, 11 abstained
105Amendment 509 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 509/2 Roll call486 for, 100 against, 30 abstained
106Amendment 522 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 522/2 Roll call448 for, 172 against, 10 abstained
107Amendment 543 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 543/2 Roll call493 for, 130 against, 8 abstained
108Amendment 547 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 547/2 Roll call411 for, 194 against, 3 abstained
109Amendment 575 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 575/2 Roll call478 for, 145 against, 7 abstained
110Amendment 522 — part 3 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 522/3 Roll call442 for, 169 against, 15 abstained
111Amendment 547 — part 3 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 547/3 Roll call481 for, 132 against, 9 abstained
112Amendment 423 — part 4 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 423/4 Roll call463 for, 144 against, 24 abstained
113Amendment 522 — part 4 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 522/4 Roll call331 for, 287 against, 12 abstained
114Amendment 185 to Annex I — part 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Annex I – Am 185/1 Roll call155 for, 459 against, 9 abstained
115Amendment 175 to Annex I — part 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Annex I – Am 175/1 Roll call488 for, 124 against, 12 abstained
116Amendment 185 to Annex I — part 2 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Annex I – Am 185/2 Roll call131 for, 477 against, 10 abstained
117Amendment 175 to Annex I — part 2 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Annex I – Am 175/2 Roll call469 for, 144 against, 11 abstained
118Amendment 175 to Annex I — part 3 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Annex I – Am 175/3 Roll call457 for, 144 against, 11 abstained
119Amendment 185 to Annex I — part 3 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Annex I – Am 185/3 Roll call130 for, 476 against, 10 abstained
120Final vote A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Commission proposal Roll call450 for, 115 against, 55 abstained
121Final vote Social Climate Fund – A9-0157/2022 – David Casa, Esther de Lange – Commission proposal Roll call479 for, 103 against, 48 abstained
122Final vote A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Commission proposal Roll call439 for, 157 against, 32 abstained

Connections

The part-session and what the day’s decisions touch.

No connections found for this item.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2022). “Sitting of Wednesday 22 June 2022”. Sitting, 22 June 2022. sitting MTG-PL-2022-06-22. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2022-06-22 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 June 2022 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2022-06-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 June 2022 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2022-06-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2022-06-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2022-06-22/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-sitting-2022-06-22,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Sitting of Wednesday 22 June 2022}},
  year = {2022},
  date = {2022-06-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2022-06-22}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2022-06-22},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Sitting. sitting MTG-PL-2022-06-22. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2022-06-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2022-06-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2022-06-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}