Sitting · Plenary
Wednesday 22 June 2022
- Date
- Wednesday 22 June 2022
- Part-session
- unknown
- Decisions
- 0 decisions
- Votes
- 122 votes · 122 roll calls
More facts (4)
- Voting time
- 15:42–16:33
- Amendments
- 118
- Previous sitting
- Thursday 9 June 2022
- Next sitting
- Thursday 23 June 2022
Decisions, 0
Numbered as on the sitting’s record, by kind of decision.
No decision was voted on this day.
All votes, 0
Every vote of the day recorded by name. A decision can have many votes.
No vote of this kind on this day.
Open these votes in the register to filter them further.
Other votes, 122
Votes the official records do not link to any decision of the day.
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amendment 230 to Article 1, paragraph 3 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 1, § 3 – Am 230 | Roll call | 138 for, 480 against, 7 abstained | |
| 2 | Amendment 660 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 5 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3g – § 1 – Am 660 | Roll call | 131 for, 494 against, 5 abstained | |
| 3 | Amendment 661 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 5 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3g – after § 2 – Am 661 | Roll call | 192 for, 423 against, 7 abstained | |
| 4 | Amendment 499 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3ga – § 1 – Am 499 | Roll call | 455 for, 166 against, 6 abstained | |
| 5 | Amendment 667 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC after Article 3ga – Am 667 | Roll call | 159 for, 458 against, 13 abstained |
Show the other 117 votesShow the other 117 votes
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Amendment 668 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC after Article 3ga – Am 668 | Roll call | 174 for, 450 against, 7 abstained | |
| 7 | Amendment 633 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – after point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – § 3 – sub§ 2 – Am 633 | Roll call | 184 for, 437 against, 8 abstained | |
| 8 | Amendment 634 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – after point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – § 3 – sub§ 2 – Am 634 | Roll call | 146 for, 472 against, 9 abstained | |
| 9 | Amendment 671 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point a – point i Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1 – sub§ 2a – Am 671D | Roll call | 147 for, 474 against, 7 abstained | |
| 10 | Amendment 636 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b – point ii Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 2 – sub§ 3 – point d – Am 636 | Roll call | 122 for, 494 against, 13 abstained | |
| 11 | Amendment 532 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b – point ii Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 2 – sub§ 3 – point d – Am 532 | Roll call | 453 for, 152 against, 24 abstained | |
| 12 | Amendment 672 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b – point ii Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 2 – sub§ 3 – point d – Am 672 | Roll call | 82 for, 533 against, 13 abstained | |
| 13 | Amendment 673 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – after point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 5a – Am 673 | Roll call | 143 for, 482 against, 5 abstained | |
| 14 | Amendment 637 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point e – introductory part Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 6 – Am 637D | Roll call | 126 for, 499 against, 6 abstained | |
| 15 | Amendment 638 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point g Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 8 – after § 3 – Am 638 | Roll call | 124 for, 500 against, 4 abstained | |
| 16 | Amendment 650 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point g Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 8 – § 4 – Am 650 | Roll call | 114 for, 477 against, 42 abstained | |
| 17 | Separate vote on Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – after point 12 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10b – Ams 639 640D 641D | Roll call | 116 for, 503 against, 8 abstained | |
| 18 | Amendment 652 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – after point 19 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 29a – Am 652 | Roll call | 150 for, 472 against, 10 abstained | |
| 19 | Amendments 674 + 653 (voted as one) to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 21 Directive 2003/87/EC Chapter IVa – Am 674D= 653D= | Roll call | 189 for, 411 against, 22 abstained | |
| 20 | Amendment 577 to Article 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 21 Directive 2003/87/EC Chapter IVa – Am 577 | Roll call | 416 for, 182 against, 28 abstained | |
| 21 | Amendment 677 to Article 1 — part 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – § 3 – Am 677/1 | Roll call | 490 for, 130 against, 13 abstained | |
| 22 | Amendment 678 to Article 1 — part 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1a – sub§ 2 – Am 678/1 | Roll call | 513 for, 106 against, 14 abstained | |
| 23 | Amendment 679 to Article 1 — part 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1 – after sub§ 2b – Am 679/1 | Roll call | 486 for, 128 against, 18 abstained | |
| 24 | Amendment 677 to Article 1 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – § 3 – Am 677/2 | Roll call | 446 for, 167 against, 13 abstained | |
| 25 | Amendment 678 to Article 1 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1a – sub§ 2 – Am 678/2 | Roll call | 468 for, 127 against, 17 abstained | |
| 26 | Amendment 679 to Article 1 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1 – after sub§ 2b – Am 679/2 | Roll call | 512 for, 98 against, 13 abstained | |
| 27 | Amendment 677 to Article 1 — part 3 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – § 3 – Am 677/3 | Roll call | 485 for, 82 against, 59 abstained | |
| 28 | Amendment 679 to Article 1 — part 3 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1 – after sub§ 2b – Am 679/3 | Roll call | 406 for, 186 against, 26 abstained | |
| 29 | Amendment 677 to Article 1 — part 4 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – § 3 – Am 677/4 | Roll call | 366 for, 183 against, 59 abstained | |
| 30 | Amendment 679 to Article 1 — part 4 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1 – after sub§ 2b – Am 679/4 | Roll call | 313 for, 291 against, 19 abstained | |
| 31 | Amendment 677 to Article 1 — part 5 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – § 3 – Am 677/5 | Roll call | 478 for, 125 against, 17 abstained | |
| 32 | Amendment 677 to Article 1 — part 6 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – § 3 – Am 677/6 | Roll call | 363 for, 239 against, 17 abstained | |
| 33 | Amendment 643 to Article 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 2 – § 1 – point 1 – point c Decision (EU) 2015/1814 Article 1 – § 5 – sub§ 1 – Am 643 | Roll call | 126 for, 502 against, 4 abstained | |
| 34 | Amendment 644 to Article 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 2 – § 1 – point 1 – point c Decision (EU) 2015/1814 Article 1 – § 5a – Am 644 | Roll call | 124 for, 501 against, 5 abstained | |
| 35 | Amendment 645 to Article 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 2 – § 1 – after point 1 – point c Decision (EU) 2015/1814 Article 1 – § 6 – Am 645 | Roll call | 122 for, 496 against, 7 abstained | |
| 36 | Amendment 250, adding text after Article 5 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Article 5 – Am 250 | Roll call | 124 for, 478 against, 22 abstained | |
| 37 | Amendment 130, adding text after Article 24 — part 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Article 24 – Am 130/1 | Roll call | 453 for, 157 against, 14 abstained | |
| 38 | Amendment 130, adding text after Article 24 — part 2 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Article 24 – Am 130/2 | Roll call | 488 for, 133 against, 3 abstained | |
| 39 | Amendments 207 + 252 (voted as one) to Article 30, paragraph 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 30, § 1 – Am 207= 252= | Roll call | 131 for, 482 against, 9 abstained | |
| 40 | Amendment 260 to Article 30, paragraph 2 — part 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 30, § 2 – Am 260/1 | Roll call | 380 for, 236 against, 8 abstained | |
| 41 | Amendment 260 to Article 30, paragraph 2 — part 2 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 30, § 2 – Am 260/2 | Roll call | 433 for, 165 against, 21 abstained | |
| 42 | Amendment 258 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 258 | Roll call | 138 for, 469 against, 16 abstained | |
| 43 | Amendment 191 to Article 31, after paragraph 2 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 2 – Am 191 | Roll call | 37 for, 583 against, 4 abstained | |
| 44 | Amendments 212 + 257 (voted as one) to Article 31, paragraph 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, § 1 – Am 212= 257= | Roll call | 128 for, 484 against, 10 abstained | |
| 45 | Amendment 261 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 261/1 | Roll call | 469 for, 153 against, 4 abstained | |
| 46 | Amendment 262 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 262/1 | Roll call | 449 for, 161 against, 14 abstained | |
| 47 | Amendment 261 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 2 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 261/2 | Roll call | 490 for, 127 against, 6 abstained | |
| 48 | Amendment 262 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 2 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 262/2 | Roll call | 540 for, 60 against, 8 abstained | |
| 49 | Amendment 261 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 3 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 261/3 | Roll call | 376 for, 240 against, 7 abstained | |
| 50 | Amendment 262 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 3 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 262/3 | Roll call | 436 for, 178 against, 9 abstained | |
| 51 | Amendment 262 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 4 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 262/4 | Roll call | 340 for, 263 against, 18 abstained | |
| 52 | Amendment 237 to Article 36, paragraph 3, after point d A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, after point d – Am 237 | Roll call | 122 for, 493 against, 7 abstained | |
| 53 | Amendment 264 to Article 36, paragraph 3, point c A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, point c – Am 264 | Roll call | 491 for, 119 against, 12 abstained | |
| 54 | Amendment 215 to Article 36, paragraph 3, before point a A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, before point a – Am 215 | Roll call | 119 for, 494 against, 11 abstained | |
| 55 | Amendments 198 + 216 + 263 (voted as one) to Article 36, paragraph 3, point a A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, point a – Am 198= 216= 263= | Roll call | 498 for, 117 against, 9 abstained | |
| 56 | Amendments 199 + 217 (voted as one) to Article 36, paragraph 3, point b A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, point b – Am 199= 217= | Roll call | 485 for, 119 against, 19 abstained | |
| 57 | Amendments 200 + 218 + 265 (voted as one) to Article 36, paragraph 3, point d A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, point d – Am 200= 218= 265= | Roll call | 493 for, 122 against, 9 abstained | |
| 58 | Amendment 219 to Article 36, paragraph 3, after point d A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, after point d – Am 219 | Roll call | 121 for, 479 against, 21 abstained | |
| 59 | Amendment 221 to recital 3 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 3 – Am 221 | Roll call | 127 for, 481 against, 11 abstained | |
| 60 | Amendment 629 to recital 7 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 7 – Am 629 | Roll call | 55 for, 484 against, 92 abstained | |
| 61 | Amendment 8 to recital 10 — part 3 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 10 – Am 8/3 | Roll call | 318 for, 296 against, 9 abstained | |
| 62 | Amendment 186, adding text after Recital 12 — part 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Recital 12 – Am 186/1 | Roll call | 120 for, 493 against, 6 abstained | |
| 63 | Amendment 658 to recital 29 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 29 – Am 658D | Roll call | 156 for, 470 against, 5 abstained | |
| 64 | Amendment 451 to recital 29 — part 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 29 – Am 451/1 | Roll call | 480 for, 137 against, 14 abstained | |
| 65 | Amendment 451 to recital 29 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 29 – Am 451/2 | Roll call | 417 for, 197 against, 10 abstained | |
| 66 | Amendment 451 to recital 29 — part 3 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 29 – Am 451/3 | Roll call | 348 for, 271 against, 12 abstained | |
| 67 | Amendment 676 to recital 30 — part 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 30 – Am 676/1 | Roll call | 459 for, 164 against, 6 abstained | |
| 68 | Amendment 676 to recital 30 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 30 – Am 676/2 | Roll call | 320 for, 276 against, 21 abstained | |
| 69 | Amendment 455 to recital 31 — part 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 31 – Am 455/1 | Roll call | 490 for, 122 against, 10 abstained | |
| 70 | Amendment 455 to recital 31 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 31 – Am 455/2 | Roll call | 462 for, 151 against, 16 abstained | |
| 71 | Amendment 33 to recital 50 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 50 – Am 33 | Roll call | 121 for, 496 against, 7 abstained | |
| 72 | Amendments 203 + 224 (voted as one), adding text after Recital 50 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Recital 50 – Am 203= 224= | Roll call | 139 for, 476 against, 4 abstained | |
| 73 | Amendment 194, adding text after Recital 51 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Recital 51 – Am 194 | Roll call | 287 for, 330 against, 5 abstained | |
| 74 | Amendments 205 + 226 (voted as one), adding text after Recital 52 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Recital 52 – Am 205= 226= | Roll call | 120 for, 470 against, 28 abstained | |
| 75 | Amendment 40 to recital 55 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 55 – Am 40 | Roll call | 480 for, 137 against, 5 abstained | |
| 76 | Amendment 187 to recital 55 — part 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 55 – Am 187/1 | Roll call | 120 for, 493 against, 6 abstained | |
| 77 | Amendment 187 to recital 55 — part 2 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 55 – Am 187/2 | Roll call | 141 for, 466 against, 8 abstained | |
| 78 | Amendment 188, adding text after Recital 55 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Recital 55 – Am 188 | Roll call | 115 for, 498 against, 4 abstained | |
| 79 | Amendment 220 Carbon border adjustment mechanism – A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Proposal to reject the Commission proposal – Am 220 | Roll call | 69 for, 506 against, 48 abstained | |
| 80 | Amendment 14 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 14 | Roll call | 544 for, 78 against, 5 abstained | |
| 81 | Amendment 20 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 20 | Roll call | 490 for, 129 against, 4 abstained | |
| 82 | Amendment 25 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 25D | Roll call | 479 for, 134 against, 10 abstained | |
| 83 | Amendment 177 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 177 | Roll call | 472 for, 145 against, 8 abstained | |
| 84 | Amendment 178 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 178 | Roll call | 475 for, 140 against, 9 abstained | |
| 85 | Amendment 179 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 179 | Roll call | 487 for, 128 against, 8 abstained | |
| 86 | Amendment 47 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 47 | Roll call | 464 for, 150 against, 8 abstained | |
| 87 | Amendment 675 Revision of the EU Emissions Trading System – A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Proposal to reject the Commission proposal – Am 675 | Roll call | 114 for, 499 against, 12 abstained | |
| 88 | Amendment 456 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 456 | Roll call | 450 for, 169 against, 13 abstained | |
| 89 | Amendment 463 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 463 | Roll call | 441 for, 182 against, 7 abstained | |
| 90 | Amendment 508 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 508 | Roll call | 436 for, 176 against, 14 abstained | |
| 91 | Amendment 531 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 531 | Roll call | 438 for, 180 against, 14 abstained | |
| 92 | Amendment 559 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 559 | Roll call | 415 for, 199 against, 17 abstained | |
| 93 | Amendment 561 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 561 | Roll call | 499 for, 97 against, 35 abstained | |
| 94 | Amendment 570 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 570 | Roll call | 419 for, 202 against, 11 abstained | |
| 95 | Amendment 620 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 620 | Roll call | 360 for, 264 against, 7 abstained | |
| 96 | Amendment 622 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 622 | Roll call | 460 for, 158 against, 13 abstained | |
| 97 | Amendment 623 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 623 | Roll call | 444 for, 168 against, 12 abstained | |
| 98 | Amendment 446 — part 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 446/1 | Roll call | 576 for, 52 against, 4 abstained | |
| 99 | Amendment 509 — part 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 509/1 | Roll call | 545 for, 56 against, 30 abstained | |
| 100 | Amendment 547 — part 1 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 547/1 | Roll call | 566 for, 59 against, 5 abstained | |
| 101 | Amendment 24 — part 2 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 24/2 | Roll call | 477 for, 140 against, 9 abstained | |
| 102 | Amendment 446 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 446/2 | Roll call | 484 for, 127 against, 8 abstained | |
| 103 | Amendment 462 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 462/2 | Roll call | 460 for, 139 against, 34 abstained | |
| 104 | Amendment 506 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 506/rev/2 | Roll call | 439 for, 182 against, 11 abstained | |
| 105 | Amendment 509 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 509/2 | Roll call | 486 for, 100 against, 30 abstained | |
| 106 | Amendment 522 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 522/2 | Roll call | 448 for, 172 against, 10 abstained | |
| 107 | Amendment 543 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 543/2 | Roll call | 493 for, 130 against, 8 abstained | |
| 108 | Amendment 547 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 547/2 | Roll call | 411 for, 194 against, 3 abstained | |
| 109 | Amendment 575 — part 2 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 575/2 | Roll call | 478 for, 145 against, 7 abstained | |
| 110 | Amendment 522 — part 3 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 522/3 | Roll call | 442 for, 169 against, 15 abstained | |
| 111 | Amendment 547 — part 3 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 547/3 | Roll call | 481 for, 132 against, 9 abstained | |
| 112 | Amendment 423 — part 4 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 423/4 | Roll call | 463 for, 144 against, 24 abstained | |
| 113 | Amendment 522 — part 4 A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 522/4 | Roll call | 331 for, 287 against, 12 abstained | |
| 114 | Amendment 185 to Annex I — part 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Annex I – Am 185/1 | Roll call | 155 for, 459 against, 9 abstained | |
| 115 | Amendment 175 to Annex I — part 1 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Annex I – Am 175/1 | Roll call | 488 for, 124 against, 12 abstained | |
| 116 | Amendment 185 to Annex I — part 2 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Annex I – Am 185/2 | Roll call | 131 for, 477 against, 10 abstained | |
| 117 | Amendment 175 to Annex I — part 2 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Annex I – Am 175/2 | Roll call | 469 for, 144 against, 11 abstained | |
| 118 | Amendment 175 to Annex I — part 3 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Annex I – Am 175/3 | Roll call | 457 for, 144 against, 11 abstained | |
| 119 | Amendment 185 to Annex I — part 3 A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Annex I – Am 185/3 | Roll call | 130 for, 476 against, 10 abstained | |
| 120 | Final vote A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Commission proposal | Roll call | 450 for, 115 against, 55 abstained | |
| 121 | Final vote Social Climate Fund – A9-0157/2022 – David Casa, Esther de Lange – Commission proposal | Roll call | 479 for, 103 against, 48 abstained | |
| 122 | Final vote A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Commission proposal | Roll call | 439 for, 157 against, 32 abstained |
Connections
The part-session and what the day’s decisions touch.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official sources
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 27 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2022). “Sitting of Wednesday 22 June 2022”. Sitting, 22 June 2022. sitting MTG-PL-2022-06-22. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2022-06-22 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 June 2022 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2022-06-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 June 2022 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2022-06-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2022-06-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2022-06-22/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-sitting-2022-06-22,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Sitting of Wednesday 22 June 2022}},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-22},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2022-06-22}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2022-06-22},
urldate = {2026-09-27},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Sitting. sitting MTG-PL-2022-06-22. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2022-06-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2022-06-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2022-06-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}