Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Sitting · Plenary

Thursday 9 June 2022

Date
Thursday 9 June 2022
Part-session
unknown
Decisions
0 decisions
Votes
47 votes · 47 roll calls
More facts (4)
Voting time
13:02–13:28
Amendments
27
Previous sitting
Wednesday 8 June 2022
Next sitting
Wednesday 22 June 2022
More
Cite this page Results of votes (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Decisions, 0

Numbered as on the sitting’s record, by kind of decision.

No decision was voted on this day.

All votes, 0

Every vote of the day recorded by name. A decision can have many votes.

No vote of this kind on this day.

Open these votes in the register to filter them further.

Other votes, 47

Votes the official records do not link to any decision of the day.

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 1, adding text before paragraph 1 The call for a Convention for the revision of the Treaties – B9-0307/2022 – Before § 1 – Am 1 Roll call77 for, 477 against, 16 abstained
2Amendment 2, adding text before paragraph 1 B9-0307/2022 – Before § 1 – Am 2 Roll call65 for, 489 against, 9 abstained
3Amendment 3, adding text before paragraph 1 B9-0307/2022 – Before § 1 – Am 3 Roll call62 for, 478 against, 33 abstained
4Amendment 4, adding text before paragraph 1 B9-0307/2022 – Before § 1 – Am 4 Roll call153 for, 398 against, 17 abstained
5Amendment 3, adding text before paragraph 1 Menaces pour le droit à l'avortement dans le monde: démantèlement possible du droit à l'avortement par la Cour suprême des États-Unis – Global threats to abortion rights: the possible overturn of abortion rights in the US by the Supreme Court – Weltweite Bedrohungen des Rechts auf Abtreibung – etwaige Abschaffung des Rechts auf Abtreibung in den USA durch den Obersten Gerichtshof – B9-0299/2022 – Before § 1 – Am 3 Roll call122 for, 425 against, 22 abstained
Show the other 42 votesShow the other 42 votes
Votes not linked to a decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
6Amendment 1, adding text before paragraph 1 B9-0299/2022 – Before § 1 – Am 1 Roll call126 for, 406 against, 36 abstained
7Amendment 2, adding text before paragraph 1 B9-0299/2022 – Before § 1 – Am 2 Roll call138 for, 405 against, 19 abstained
8Paragraph 1 — part 2 The instrumentalisation of justice as a repressive tool in Nicaragua – RC-B9-0293/2022 – § 1/2 Roll call525 for, 15 against, 29 abstained
9Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 RC-B9-0293/2022 – After § 1 – Am 2 Roll call58 for, 497 against, 14 abstained
10Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 RC-B9-0293/2022 – After § 1 – Am 3 Roll call59 for, 475 against, 33 abstained
11Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 2 B9-0307/2022 – After § 2 – Am 5 Roll call65 for, 388 against, 116 abstained
12Separate vote on paragraph 3 The rule of law and the potential approval of the Polish national Recovery Plan (RRF) – RC-B9-0317/2022 – § 3 Roll call414 for, 136 against, 23 abstained
13Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 RC-B9-0293/2022 – § 4 – Am 1 Roll call267 for, 287 against, 11 abstained
14Separate vote on paragraph 4 The human rights situation in Xinjiang, including the Xinjiang police files – RC-B9-0310/2022 – § 4 Roll call513 for, 1 against, 14 abstained
15Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 4 B9-0307/2022 – After § 4 – Am 37 Roll call116 for, 336 against, 113 abstained
16Amendment 17 to paragraph 5 B9-0307/2022 – § 5 – Am 17 Roll call99 for, 359 against, 103 abstained
17Amendment 23 to paragraph 5 B9-0307/2022 – § 5 – Am 23 Roll call104 for, 354 against, 105 abstained
18Amendment 25 to paragraph 5 B9-0307/2022 – § 5 – Am 25 Roll call64 for, 381 against, 119 abstained
19Amendment 26 to paragraph 5 B9-0307/2022 – § 5 – Am 26 Roll call65 for, 373 against, 124 abstained
20Amendment 28 to paragraph 5 B9-0307/2022 – § 5 – Am 28 Roll call206 for, 258 against, 96 abstained
21Amendment 38 to paragraph 5 B9-0307/2022 – § 5 – Am 38 Roll call359 for, 166 against, 37 abstained
22Paragraph 5 — part 1 B9-0299/2022 – § 5/1 Roll call366 for, 139 against, 53 abstained
23Paragraph 5 — part 2 B9-0299/2022 – § 5/2 Roll call364 for, 142 against, 51 abstained
24Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 B9-0307/2022 – § 6 – Am 29 Roll call115 for, 326 against, 110 abstained
25Amendment 36 to paragraph 6 B9-0307/2022 – § 6 – Am 36 Roll call170 for, 358 against, 32 abstained
26Amendment 39 to paragraph 6 B9-0307/2022 – § 6 – Am 39 Roll call391 for, 110 against, 56 abstained
27Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 6 RC-B9-0317/2022 – After § 6 – Am 1 Roll call161 for, 382 against, 25 abstained
28Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 8 RC-B9-0310/2022 – After § 8 – Am 6 Roll call122 for, 402 against, 25 abstained
29Amendment 7 to paragraph 9 RC-B9-0310/2022 – § 9 – Am 7 Roll call42 for, 413 against, 93 abstained
30Amendment 2 to paragraph 20 Parliament’s right of initiative – A9-0142/2022 – Paulo Rangel – § 20 – Am 2 Roll call113 for, 250 against, 214 abstained
31Paragraph 21 — part 1 B9-0299/2022 – § 21/1 Roll call446 for, 75 against, 47 abstained
32Paragraph 21 — part 2 B9-0299/2022 – § 21/2 Roll call366 for, 151 against, 47 abstained
33Paragraph 28 — part 1 B9-0299/2022 – § 28/1 Roll call428 for, 74 against, 64 abstained
34Paragraph 28 — part 2 B9-0299/2022 – § 28/2 Roll call411 for, 82 against, 50 abstained
35Paragraph 28 — part 3 B9-0299/2022 – § 28/3 Roll call377 for, 131 against, 45 abstained
36Separate vote on recital A B9-0299/2022 – Recital A Roll call375 for, 142 against, 51 abstained
37Recital I — part 2 RC-B9-0293/2022 – Recital I/2 Roll call529 for, 12 against, 32 abstained
38Amendment 8, adding text after recital D B9-0307/2022 – After recital D – Am 8 Roll call69 for, 444 against, 43 abstained
39Amendment 5, adding text after recital H RC-B9-0310/2022 – After recital H – Am 5 Roll call43 for, 491 against, 25 abstained
40Separate vote on recital L RC-B9-0293/2022 – Recital L Roll call258 for, 309 against, 7 abstained
41Final vote on the motion for a resolution A9-0142/2022 – Paulo Rangel – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole) Roll call420 for, 117 against, 35 abstained
42Final vote on the provisional agreement International procurement instrument – A9-0337/2021 – Daniel Caspary – Provisional agreement – Am 107 Roll call554 for, 7 against, 14 abstained
43Final vote on the motion for a resolution Nouvel instrument commercial visant à interdire les produits issus du travail forcé – A new trade instrument to ban products made by forced labour – Ein neues Instrument zum Verbot von Produkten, die in Zwangsarbeit hergestellt wurden – B9-0291/2022 – Motion for a resolution Roll call503 for, 6 against, 4 abstained
44Final vote on the motion for a resolution B9-0307/2022 – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole) Roll call355 for, 154 against, 48 abstained
45Final vote on the motion for a resolution RC-B9-0293/2022 – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole) Roll call524 for, 17 against, 29 abstained
46Final vote on the motion for a resolution B9-0299/2022 – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole) Roll call364 for, 154 against, 37 abstained
47Final vote on the motion for a resolution RC-B9-0317/2022 – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole) Roll call411 for, 129 against, 31 abstained

Connections

The part-session and what the day’s decisions touch.

No connections found for this item.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2022-06-09
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2022). “Sitting of Thursday 9 June 2022”. Sitting, 9 June 2022. sitting MTG-PL-2022-06-09. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2022-06-09 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 June 2022 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2022-06-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 June 2022 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2022-06-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2022-06-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2022-06-09/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-sitting-2022-06-09,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Sitting of Thursday 9 June 2022}},
  year = {2022},
  date = {2022-06-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2022-06-09}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2022-06-09},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Sitting. sitting MTG-PL-2022-06-09. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2022-06-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2022-06-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2022-06-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}