Member

Waldemar BUDA

ECR · Poland

Group: ECR
Country: Poland
Roll-call participation: 85.3 %ⓘ of 293 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.5 % · 2025, final votes
With majority line: 83.1 %ⓘ of 249 votes where the group had a line · ECR median 88.1 %

More facts (5)

National party: PiS Prawo i Sprawiedliwość
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 13 of 201 votesⓘ
Committees: AGRI, ECON (substitute), INTA (substitute), SANT
Member id: 99878

National party: PiS Prawo i Sprawiedliwość
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 13 of 201 votesⓘ
Committees: AGRI, ECON (substitute), INTA (substitute), SANT
Member id: 99878

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

85.3 %

250 of 293 final votes while in office

ECR median: 93.2 % (−7.8 pts)

Chamber median: 91.5 %

With majority line ⓘ

83.1 %

207 of 249 votes where their group had a line

ECR median: 88.1 % (−5.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

6.5 %

13 of 201 votes where their group had a clear line

6 opposite (for ↔ against), 5 abstained against the line, 2 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

10.0 %

25 of 250 votes cast

Participation 85.3 % — ECR median 93.2 %, 79 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Waldemar BUDA	85.3 %
ECR median	93.2 %
Lowest in the group	47.1 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	79

With majority line 83.1 % — ECR median 88.1 %, 79 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Waldemar BUDA	83.1 %
ECR median	88.1 %
Lowest in the group	47.0 %
Highest in the group	95.9 %
Members	79

2025, 293 final votes; 293 of 371 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of ECR; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 38 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	1	1
23 Jan 2025	4	2
11 Feb 2025	4	4
12 Feb 2025	4	0
13 Feb 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	4	4
12 Mar 2025	7	6
13 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	7	7
2 Apr 2025	9	8
3 Apr 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	4	4
7 May 2025	20	18
8 May 2025	12	12
22 May 2025	6	5
17 Jun 2025	8	7
18 Jun 2025	7	5
19 Jun 2025	6	4
8 Jul 2025	8	8
9 Jul 2025	14	12
10 Jul 2025	7	6
9 Sept 2025	6	5
10 Sept 2025	15	12
11 Sept 2025	8	7
7 Oct 2025	4	3
8 Oct 2025	10	10
9 Oct 2025	10	10
21 Oct 2025	8	8
22 Oct 2025	6	5
23 Oct 2025	5	3
13 Nov 2025	16	8
25 Nov 2025	13	12
26 Nov 2025	10	10
27 Nov 2025	11	8
16 Dec 2025	11	10
17 Dec 2025	11	10
18 Dec 2025	6	5

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ECR

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Maciej WĄSIK	Maciej WĄSIK	ECR	Poland	99 % of 4 801 shared	81 %
Select Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	ECR	Poland	98 % of 4 448 shared	81 %
Select Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	ECR	Poland	97 % of 4 867 shared	81 %
Select Piotr MÜLLER	Piotr MÜLLER	ECR	Poland	97 % of 4 211 shared	81 %
Select Marlena MALĄG	Marlena MALĄG	ECR	Poland	97 % of 4 810 shared	81 %
Select Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI	Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI	ECR	Poland	97 % of 4 291 shared	81 %
Select Anna ZALEWSKA	Anna ZALEWSKA	ECR	Poland	97 % of 4 861 shared	81 %
Select Jacek OZDOBA	Jacek OZDOBA	ECR	Poland	97 % of 4 476 shared	81 %
Select Beata SZYDŁO	Beata SZYDŁO	ECR	Poland	97 % of 4 685 shared	81 %
Select Bogdan RZOŃCA	Bogdan RZOŃCA	ECR	Poland	97 % of 4 888 shared	81 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ	Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ	Patriots	Portugal	75 % of 4 691 shared	68 %
Select Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL	Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL	Patriots	Spain	75 % of 4 336 shared	68 %
Select Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN	Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN	Patriots	Spain	75 % of 4 574 shared	68 %
Select Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA	Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA	Patriots	Spain	75 % of 4 669 shared	68 %
Select Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN	Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN	Patriots	Spain	75 % of 4 879 shared	68 %
Select Hermann TERTSCH	Hermann TERTSCH	Patriots	Spain	75 % of 3 682 shared	68 %
Select Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS	Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS	Patriots	Spain	74 % of 3 749 shared	68 %
Select Anna BRYŁKA	Anna BRYŁKA changed group	Patriots	Poland	74 % of 4 560 shared	67 %
Select Ondřej KOVAŘÍK	Ondřej KOVAŘÍK Former member	Patriots	Czechia	73 % of 1 074 shared	68 %
Select Antonín STANĚK	Antonín STANĚK	Patriots	Czechia	73 % of 2 728 shared	68 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON Committee	Substitute	15 Jul 2026	now
Committee on International TradeINTA Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Public HealthSANT Committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation for relations with the Arab PeninsulaDARP Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with MercosurDMER Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	13 Sept 2026

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agriculture	Shadow rapporteur	AGRI	18 Jun 2026
Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agriculture	Rapporteur	AGRI	17 Jun 2026
Establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activities	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	AGRI	14 Jan 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	AGRI	14 Jan 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	REGI	13 Jan 2026
Laying down Union procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human use and establishing rules governing the European Medicines Agency, amending Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 and Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 and Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006	Shadow rapporteur	SANT	25 Nov 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation	INTA	8 Sept 2025
Public health aspects of biotechnology and life sciences	Shadow rapporteur	SANT	12 May 2025
Cooperation among enforcement authorities responsible for the enforcement of Directive (EU) 2019/633 on unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships in the agricultural and food supply chain	Shadow rapporteur	AGRI	22 Apr 2025
Amended proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a mechanism to resolve legal and administrative obstacles in a cross-border context	Shadow rapporteur	REGI	25 Oct 2024

Show all 12 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

21 contributions recorded; 28 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
7 Jul 2026	EU-Mexico (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
6 Jul 2026	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Jun 2026	Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
18 May 2026	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
27 Apr 2026	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 2 min	Read
9 Feb 2026	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Oct 2025	Common agricultural policy (joint debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
9 Sept 2025	Cohesion policy (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Jul 2025	Post-2027 Common Agricultural Policy (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
16 Jun 2025	Strengthening rural areas in the EU through cohesion policy (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read

Show all 21 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 31

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0420	Motion for a resolutionwith 19 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0419	Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong-Kong, amid the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0407	Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors	—
9 Sept 2026	The provisional application of the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement P-10-2026-003598	Priority written question	Not yet answered
31 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373	Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors	—
11 Jul 2026	Increase in the bioethanol blending rate under the Fuel Quality Directive E-10-2026-002866	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	22 Sept 2026
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Threat of War Crimes, the Escalating Violations of International Humanitarian Law and the Human Rights Situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0363	Motion for a resolutionwith 15 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0356	Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan B-10-2026-0351	Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors	—
1 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation (EU) of 27 March 2026 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/688 as regards infection with bluetongue virus (serotypes 1-24) and infection with epizootic haemorrhagic disease virus and introducing a derogation for movements of registered equine animals B-10-2026-0342	Motion for a resolutionwith 40 co-authors	—

Show all 31 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 75

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
27 Aug 2026	Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791869	REGI	18
23 Jul 2026	Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791875	REGI	7
23 Jul 2026	Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791872	REGI	9
23 Jul 2026	Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilienceand cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791870	REGI	4
17 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790898	AGRI	3
17 Jul 2026	Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agriculture AGRI-AM-791100	AGRI	40
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790936	CJ53	4
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790899	AGRI	7
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790915	AGRI	5
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790916	AGRI	11

Show all 75 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European Conservatives and Reformists ECR · Right-wing · national conservatism, EU-critical

National delegation

Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/99878?period=2025&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Waldemar BUDA”. Member record. memberId 99878. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/99878?period=2025&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/99878. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/99878?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-99878,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Waldemar BUDA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/99878?period=2025&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/99878?period=2025&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 99878. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/99878. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within ECR

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 31

Amendments tabled in committee, 75

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928