Member

Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR

S&D · Spain

Group: S&D
Country: Spain
Roll-call participation: 96.9 %ⓘ of 2 521 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.9 % · 2026, roll calls
With majority line: 94.0 %ⓘ of 2 442 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 95.8 %

More facts (5)

National party: PSOE Partido Socialista Obrero Español
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 117 of 2 389 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO, DEVE (substitute), LIBE
Member id: 96812

National party: PSOE Partido Socialista Obrero Español
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 117 of 2 389 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO, DEVE (substitute), LIBE
Member id: 96812

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

96.9 %

2 442 of 2 521 roll calls while in office

S&D median: 90.1 % (+6.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.9 %

With majority line ⓘ

94.0 %

2 295 of 2 442 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 95.8 % (−1.9 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.9 %

117 of 2 389 votes where their group had a clear line

80 opposite (for ↔ against), 31 abstained against the line, 6 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

2.4 %

59 of 2 442 votes cast

Participation 96.9 % — S&D median 90.1 %, 135 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 135 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR	96.9 %
S&D median	90.1 %
Lowest in the group	35.1 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	135

With majority line 94.0 % — S&D median 95.8 %, 135 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 135 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR	94.0 %
S&D median	95.8 %
Lowest in the group	83.7 %
Highest in the group	99.5 %
Members	135

2026, 2 521 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 34 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	67	62
21 Jan 2026	112	112
22 Jan 2026	58	57
9 Feb 2026	2	2
10 Feb 2026	38	38
11 Feb 2026	13	11
12 Feb 2026	141	138
24 Feb 2026	43	43
9 Mar 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	197	193
11 Mar 2026	60	60
12 Mar 2026	34	34
25 Mar 2026	3	3
26 Mar 2026	69	67
27 Apr 2026	2	2
28 Apr 2026	225	216
29 Apr 2026	296	286
30 Apr 2026	68	65
18 May 2026	4	0
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	92
21 May 2026	98	96
15 Jun 2026	2	2
16 Jun 2026	40	40
17 Jun 2026	127	122
18 Jun 2026	77	70
6 Jul 2026	2	2
7 Jul 2026	72	71
8 Jul 2026	144	140
9 Jul 2026	67	64
14 Sept 2026	1	1
15 Sept 2026	155	150
16 Sept 2026	80	77
17 Sept 2026	124	122

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Alicia HOMS GINEL	Alicia HOMS GINEL	S&D	Spain	97 % of 4 829 shared	93 %
Select Jonás FERNÁNDEZ	Jonás FERNÁNDEZ	S&D	Spain	97 % of 5 264 shared	93 %
Select Marcos ROS SEMPERE	Marcos ROS SEMPERE	S&D	Spain	97 % of 5 198 shared	93 %
Select Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ	Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ	S&D	Spain	97 % of 5 207 shared	93 %
Select Rosa SERRANO SIERRA	Rosa SERRANO SIERRA	S&D	Spain	97 % of 5 643 shared	93 %
Select Elena SANCHO MURILLO	Elena SANCHO MURILLO	S&D	Spain	97 % of 5 682 shared	93 %
Select José CEPEDA	José CEPEDA	S&D	Spain	97 % of 4 923 shared	93 %
Select Idoia MENDIA	Idoia MENDIA	S&D	Spain	96 % of 5 528 shared	93 %
Select Lina GÁLVEZ	Lina GÁLVEZ	S&D	Spain	96 % of 4 751 shared	93 %
Select Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA	Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA	S&D	Spain	96 % of 3 892 shared	93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Jana TOOM	Jana TOOM	Renew	Estonia	88 % of 4 901 shared	86 %
Select Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Renew	Belgium	88 % of 4 080 shared	86 %
Select Bernard GUETTA	Bernard GUETTA	Renew	France	87 % of 5 052 shared	86 %
Select Pascal CANFIN	Pascal CANFIN	Renew	France	87 % of 5 134 shared	86 %
Select Dainius ŽALIMAS	Dainius ŽALIMAS	Renew	Lithuania	87 % of 5 316 shared	86 %
Select Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Renew	Netherlands	87 % of 5 624 shared	86 %
Select Ľudovít ÓDOR	Ľudovít ÓDOR	Renew	Slovakia	87 % of 5 348 shared	86 %
Select Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE	Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE	Renew	Netherlands	87 % of 5 686 shared	86 %
Select Vlad VASILE-VOICULESCU	Vlad VASILE-VOICULESCU	Renew	Romania	87 % of 4 773 shared	86 %
Select Brigitte VAN DEN BERG	Brigitte VAN DEN BERG	Renew	Netherlands	87 % of 4 873 shared	86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on DevelopmentDEVE Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committee	Substitute	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation to the Cariforum-EU Parliamentary CommitteeDCAR Joint parliamentary committee	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the Arab PeninsulaDARP Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDAFR Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	24 Jul 2026	now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group	Member	16 Jan 2025	now

Show all 13 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in respect of Gibraltar between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	LIBE	21 Sept 2026
Amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure on proxy voting during pregnancy and immediately after childbirth	Rapporteur	AFCO	10 Sept 2026
17th Ordinary Plenary Session of the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly	Official delegation	DLAT	2 Sept 2026
6th EU-Bahrain Interparliamentary Meeting	Official delegation	DARP	31 Aug 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	LIBE	27 Aug 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	LIBE	15 Jul 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	AFCO	15 Jul 2026
First EU-Africa Assembly	Official delegation	DAFR	27 Apr 2026
Amending the Act concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage, annexed to Council Decision 76/787/ECSC, EEC, Euratom of 20 September 1976	Rapporteur	AFCO	30 Mar 2026
First Africa-EU Parliamentary Assembly, 12-14 May 2026	Official delegation	DACP	10 Mar 2026

Show all 34 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

310 contributions recorded; 11 on behalf of their group; 393 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Sept 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure (A10-0212/2026 - Rasa Juknevičienė)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Sept 2026	Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures (A10-0201/2026 - Mohammed Chahim)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Escalation in the Middle East (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Hybrid attacks against the EU Member States (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
14 Sept 2026	Government crackdown on the LGBTIQ+ Community in Türkiye: Türkiye’s compliance with its international commitments on non-discrimination (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
14 Sept 2026	Establishing the Union Customs Code and the European Union Customs Authority (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 21

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders B-10-2026-0413	Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors	—
9 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers B-10-2026-0390	Motion for a resolutionwith 7 co-authors	—
9 Sept 2026	Strengthening EU measures to address thefts of cultural property in Member States E-10-2026-003600	Written questionwith 4 co-authors	Not yet answered
24 Jul 2026	Compatibility with EU law of legislative measures adopted by the Parliament of the Autonomous Community of Valencia with regard to ‘national priority’ E-10-2026-003118	Written questionwith 16 co-authors	15 Sept 2026
23 Jul 2026	Unitary use principle for tourist establishments P-10-2026-003105	Priority written question	28 Aug 2026
16 Jul 2026	Ensuring the continued operation of the Blue Flag Programme under Directive (EU) 2024/825 E-10-2026-003031	Written questionwith 29 co-authors	18 Sept 2026
2 Jul 2026	Sale of assets confiscated from opponents by the Ortega and Murillo regime in Nicaragua E-10-2026-002747	Written questionwith 6 co-authors	7 Aug 2026
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
7 May 2026	European Union coordination and support to the Canary Islands following the activation of the Civil Protection Mechanism due to the hantavirus outbreak E-10-2026-001899	Written question	6 Jul 2026
4 May 2026	Decarbonising transport in the outermost regions: the specific challenges and needs of the Canary Islands E-10-2026-001805	Written question	22 Jun 2026
28 Apr 2026	Compatibility of the principle of ‘national priority’ with EU law E-10-2026-001720	Written questionwith 19 co-authors	1 Jul 2026
2 Apr 2026	Double standards in the EU’s relationship with Israel E-10-2026-001376	Written questionwith 4 co-authors	27 May 2026
2 Apr 2026	Double standards in the EU’s relationship with Israel E-10-2026-001373	Written questionwith 2 co-authors	Not yet answered
11 Mar 2026	Implementation deadline in Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) regions E-10-2026-001001	Written question	22 Apr 2026
2 Dec 2025	European Democracy Shield – very large online platform algorithms, foreign interference and the spread of disinformation O-10-2025-000044	Oral questionwith 46 co-authors	Not yet answered
22 Oct 2025	Delay in reporting by the Commission E-10-2025-004164	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	13 Jan 2026
3 Oct 2025	The unresolved situation of displaced people and prisoners of war from Nagorno-Karabakh after the peace deal E-10-2025-003885	Written questionwith 3 co-authors	20 Jan 2026
9 Sept 2025	Protection of journalists and investigation into killings in Gaza E-10-2025-003482	Written questionwith 108 co-authors	4 Nov 2025
17 Jul 2025	Polish law suspending the right to asylum E-10-2025-002972	Written question	10 Oct 2025
3 Apr 2025	Police and security cooperation between Europol and the Dominican Republic E-10-2025-001379	Written questionwith 1 co-author	3 Jun 2025
12 Feb 2025	The death of three minors at the Bulgarian border E-10-2025-000665	Written questionwith 34 co-authors	29 Apr 2025

Amendments tabled in committee, 38

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790099	CJ71	3
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790159	CJ71	1
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790105	CJ71	18
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790090	CJ71	1
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790091	CJ71	1
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790094	CJ71	1
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790098	CJ71	5
24 Apr 2026	Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787835	CJ05	1
24 Apr 2026	Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787837	CJ05	1
12 Feb 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784367	EUDS	28

Show all 38 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats S&D · Centre-left · social democracy

National delegation

Delegation Spain National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96812?docs=all&period=2026&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR”. Member record. memberId 96812. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96812?docs=all&period=2026&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96812. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/96812?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-96812,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96812?docs=all&period=2026&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96812?docs=all&period=2026&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 96812. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96812. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within S&D

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 21

Amendments tabled in committee, 38

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928