Skip to content

Member

Majbritt BIRKHOLM

Patriots · Denmark

Group
Patriots PfE
Country
Denmark
Roll-call participation
96.2 %ⓘ of 1 683 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
85.2 %ⓘ of 1 612 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 82.7 %
More facts (5)
National party
O Dansk Folkeparti
In office
Since 16 Apr 2026
Against clear line
102 of 1 309 votesⓘ
Committees
ITRE, LIBE (substitute)
Member id
277178
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

96.2 %

1 619 of 1 683 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 91.1 % (+5.1 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

85.2 %

1 374 of 1 612 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 82.7 % (+2.6 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

7.8 %

102 of 1 309 votes where their group had a clear line

27 opposite (for ↔ against), 67 abstained against the line, 8 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

13.6 %

220 of 1 619 votes cast

Participation 96.2 % — Patriots median 91.1 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Majbritt BIRKHOLM96.2 %
Patriots median91.1 %
Lowest in the group44.5 %
Highest in the group99.9 %
Members89
With majority line 85.2 % — Patriots median 82.7 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Majbritt BIRKHOLM85.2 %
Patriots median82.7 %
Lowest in the group72.5 %
Highest in the group92.9 %
Members89
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 1 683

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
30 Apr 2026Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela Amendment 2 to paragraph 5 157 for, 329 against, 69 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela Amendment 8 to paragraph 4 83 for, 465 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela Amendment 6 to paragraph 2 49 for, 504 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 439 for, 52 against, 71 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
30 Apr 2026New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 104 for, 377 against, 86 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 511 for, 21 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Amendment 4, adding text after recital B 86 for, 415 against, 66 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Abstained
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Paragraph 6 — part 2 370 for, 180 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Amendment 3 to paragraph 6 99 for, 427 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 5 84 for, 464 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Genetically modified soybean MON 94637 Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 412 for, 145 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 416 for, 190 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 6, adding text after recital D 187 for, 419 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 48 195 for, 419 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 36 202 for, 423 against, 1 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 36 205 for, 403 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 14 to paragraph 36 202 for, 424 against, 1 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 31 193 for, 421 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 22 195 for, 420 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 24 to paragraph 19 189 for, 425 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 17 197 for, 421 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 22 to paragraph 17 198 for, 417 against, 1 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 193 for, 428 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 6 212 for, 406 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Paragraph 2 — part 2 407 for, 190 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 387 for, 191 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 14 to recital R 220 for, 399 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 12 to paragraph 185 185 for, 426 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 11 to paragraph 168 201 for, 419 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 155 282 for, 334 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 10 to paragraph 126 192 for, 418 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 118 197 for, 416 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Separate vote on paragraph 117 336 for, 261 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 9 to paragraph 116 188 for, 422 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 113 218 for, 401 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Paragraph 112 — part 3 284 for, 335 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Paragraph 112 — part 2 408 for, 192 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Paragraph 112 — part 1 498 for, 80 against, 57 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 207 for, 410 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 6 to paragraph 103 205 for, 419 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Separate vote on paragraph 102 291 for, 240 against, 74 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Separate vote on paragraph 101 365 for, 168 against, 78 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Separate vote on paragraph 100 357 for, 203 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 5 to paragraph 91 207 for, 406 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 200 for, 411 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 196 for, 422 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 65 194 for, 417 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 17 to paragraph 55 200 for, 419 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 16 to paragraph 44 181 for, 419 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 15 to paragraph 38 206 for, 408 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 0 of 20 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
27 Apr 202622
28 Apr 2026225223
29 Apr 2026296296
30 Apr 20266868
18 May 202644
19 May 202633
20 May 20269696
21 May 20269850
15 Jun 202622
16 Jun 20264040
17 Jun 2026127126
18 Jun 20267777
6 Jul 202622
7 Jul 20267272
8 Jul 2026144144
9 Jul 20266756
14 Sept 202611
15 Sept 2026155154
16 Sept 20268080
17 Sept 2026124123

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

No member meets the rule within the group.

Outside the group

No member meets the rule outside the group.

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeMember27 Apr 2026now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute24 Apr 2026now
Delegation for relations with IranD-IR DelegationMember17 Jun 2026now

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

4 contributions recorded; 4 minutes of speaking time.

Questions and motions, 2

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
15 Sept 2026Migrant invasion in Ceuta: much-needed vigilance E-10-2026-003663Written questionwith 7 co-authorsNot yet answered
10 Sept 2026Tackling illicit trade, counterfeit nicotine products and cross-border crime in the EU P-10-2026-003608Priority written questionNot yet answered

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

No committee amendment by this member found this term.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Denmark National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Majbritt BIRKHOLM”. Member record. memberId 277178. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/277178?page=24&speeches=all&vscope=all (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/277178. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/277178?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-277178,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Majbritt BIRKHOLM}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/277178?page=24&speeches=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/277178?page=24&speeches=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 277178. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/277178. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}