Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Decision · Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure

Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25

Effect
Objection passed
Result
460 for · 189 against · 14 abstained roll call
Date
8 July 2026, 13:58
Kind
Objection to a Commission measure
More facts (10)
Margin
by a large majority
Counts are for
the objection
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0335
Dossier
2026/2745(RSP)
Source
Motion for a resolution
Topics
Agriculture, food & fisheries Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
3 votes · 1 roll call
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call)
Sitting
Wednesday 8 July 2026
Final vote
195543
More
Cite this page Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page
Votes on this decision
Members on the final vote

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 460 for, 189 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Objection passed by a large majority.

The objection passed. For an implementing measure it is not legally binding: the Commission is asked to withdraw the measure but can still adopt it.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 parts of the text voted on separately (2 rejected).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, ECR, Patriots and ESN; opposed by Renew and EPP.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 111Against 8Abst. 5No vote 11 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
RenewFor 30Against 41Abst. 3No vote 4 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.33
EPPFor 62Against 112Abst. 2No vote 9 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.45
ECRFor 60Against 15Abst. 1No vote 8 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.68
PatriotsFor 59Against 13Abst. 0No vote 13 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.73
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 24Against 0Abst. 2No vote 1 of 27Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group.

Voted against their group, 43

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria172010.84
Belgium139000.39
Bulgaria132020.80
Cyprus6000—
Czechia314040.74
Germany5537130.39
Denmark66300.10
Estonia2410—
Spain2726160.25
Finland86010.36
France691290.94
Greece200011.00
Croatia110011.00
Hungary160051.00
Ireland49010.54
Italy5492110.75
Lithuania64100.32
Luxembourg6000—
Latvia8001—
Malta3201—
Netherlands1910020.48
Poland409310.65
Portugal128010.40
Romania1118040.43
Sweden1011000.29
Slovenia7200—
Slovakia140011.00

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 663 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Victor NEGRESCU RomaniaS&DSpeeches18 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 3

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Vote on text inserted after paragraph 6 Show of hands Rejected
2Separate vote on recital Q Show of hands Rejected
3Final vote — text as a whole B10-0335/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call460 for, 189 against, 14 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left

Roll call requested by The Left.

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2026-0335

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The European Parliament voted to block a Commission plan to renew the authorisation of genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 for use in food, feed, and other products, excluding cultivation.

The objection was adopted, meaning the Commission measure is blocked and the renewal cannot go ahead.

Parliament cites concerns about herbicide tolerance, potential health and environmental risks, and the lack of member state support.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament objects to the draft Commission implementing decision renewing the authorisation of genetically modified maize NK603 × T25, considering it exceeds implementing powers and is inconsistent with Union law.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2026/2745(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject

Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3) of the Rules of Procedures on the Commission Implementing Decision renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (D115002)

Parliament adopted the text on 8 July 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 3 steps of the dossier
  1. Tabled for plenary (done)
  2. Plenary vote · Adopted 8 July 2026 (done)
  3. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: ENVI · Authors: Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN (EPP), Biljana BORZAN (S&D), Martin HÄUSLING (Greens), Anja HAZEKAMP (The Left)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 8 connections: Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-08/8
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25”. Decision, 8 July 2026. votingId 195543, document B-10-2026-0335, reference 2026/2745(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-08/8 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-08/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-decision-2026-07-08-8,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-08/8}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-08/8},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 195543, document B-10-2026-0335, reference 2026/2745(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}