Skip to content

Member

Marie-Sophie CHRIST

EPP · Germany

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
92.4 %ⓘ of 172 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
97.5 %ⓘ of 159 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
CDU Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
In office
Since 27 Mar 2026
Against clear line
3 of 154 votesⓘ
Committees
LIBE (substitute), SANT
Member id
277057
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

92.4 %

159 of 172 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (+1.9 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.5 %

155 of 159 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (+1.9 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.9 %

3 of 154 votes where their group had a clear line

2 opposite (for ↔ against), 1 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.6 %

1 of 159 votes cast

Participation 92.4 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Marie-Sophie CHRIST92.4 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 97.5 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Marie-Sophie CHRIST97.5 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 1 683

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
30 Apr 2026Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela Amendment 2 to paragraph 5 157 for, 329 against, 69 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela Amendment 8 to paragraph 4 83 for, 465 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela Amendment 6 to paragraph 2 49 for, 504 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 439 for, 52 against, 71 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
30 Apr 2026New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 104 for, 377 against, 86 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 511 for, 21 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Amendment 4, adding text after recital B 86 for, 415 against, 66 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Paragraph 6 — part 2 370 for, 180 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Amendment 3 to paragraph 6 99 for, 427 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 5 84 for, 464 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Genetically modified soybean MON 94637 Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 412 for, 145 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 416 for, 190 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 6, adding text after recital D 187 for, 419 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 48 195 for, 419 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 36 202 for, 423 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 36 205 for, 403 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 14 to paragraph 36 202 for, 424 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 31 193 for, 421 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 22 195 for, 420 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 24 to paragraph 19 189 for, 425 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 17 197 for, 421 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 22 to paragraph 17 198 for, 417 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 193 for, 428 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 6 212 for, 406 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Paragraph 2 — part 2 407 for, 190 against, 25 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 387 for, 191 against, 46 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 14 to recital R 220 for, 399 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 12 to paragraph 185 185 for, 426 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 11 to paragraph 168 201 for, 419 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 155 282 for, 334 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 10 to paragraph 126 192 for, 418 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 118 197 for, 416 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Separate vote on paragraph 117 336 for, 261 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 9 to paragraph 116 188 for, 422 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 113 218 for, 401 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Paragraph 112 — part 3 284 for, 335 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Paragraph 112 — part 2 408 for, 192 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Paragraph 112 — part 1 498 for, 80 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 207 for, 410 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 6 to paragraph 103 205 for, 419 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Separate vote on paragraph 102 291 for, 240 against, 74 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Abstained
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Separate vote on paragraph 101 365 for, 168 against, 78 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Separate vote on paragraph 100 357 for, 203 against, 45 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 5 to paragraph 91 207 for, 406 against, 3 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 200 for, 411 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 196 for, 422 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 65 194 for, 417 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 17 to paragraph 55 200 for, 419 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 16 to paragraph 44 181 for, 419 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 15 to paragraph 38 206 for, 408 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 0 of 15 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
28 Apr 20261414
29 Apr 20261715
30 Apr 20261110
19 May 202633
20 May 20261211
21 May 2026109
16 Jun 20261010
17 Jun 20261615
18 Jun 202677
7 Jul 20261513
8 Jul 20261512
9 Jul 202644
15 Sept 20261212
16 Sept 20261614
17 Sept 20261010

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA EPPRomania99 % of 482 shared89 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany98 % of 1 387 shared89 %
Andrea WECHSLER EPPGermany98 % of 1 585 shared89 %
Oliver SCHENK EPPGermany98 % of 1 603 shared89 %
Alexandra MEHNERT EPPGermany98 % of 1 523 shared89 %
Verena MERTENS EPPGermany98 % of 1 459 shared89 %
Norbert LINS EPPGermany98 % of 1 583 shared89 %
Stefan KÖHLER EPPGermany98 % of 1 602 shared89 %
Ralf SEEKATZ EPPGermany98 % of 1 337 shared89 %
Marion WALSMANN EPPGermany98 % of 1 600 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia86 % of 1 142 shared82 %
Claudiu MANDA S&DRomania86 % of 279 shared75 %
Stéphanie YON-COURTIN RenewFrance85 % of 1 062 shared82 %
Sophie WILMÈS RenewBelgium85 % of 1 173 shared82 %
Dragoş BENEA S&DRomania85 % of 794 shared75 %
Sandro GOZI RenewFrance84 % of 1 473 shared82 %
Dan NICA S&DRomania84 % of 1 032 shared75 %
Olivier CHASTEL RenewBelgium84 % of 1 261 shared82 %
Nathalie LOISEAU RenewFrance84 % of 1 459 shared82 %
Gilles BOYER RenewFrance84 % of 1 602 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute19 May 2026now
Committee on Public HealthSANT CommitteeMember19 May 2026now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute17 Sept 2026now

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
European Investigation Order in criminal matters and European Remote Participation Order (recast)Shadow rapporteurLIBE7 Sept 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationLIBE7 Sept 2026

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

No speech or statement in plenary recorded this term.

Questions and motions, 1

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
23 Jul 2026Energy Performance of Buildings Directive E-10-2026-003113Written questionwith 17 co-authorsNot yet answered

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

No committee amendment by this member found this term.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Marie-Sophie CHRIST”. Member record. memberId 277057. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/277057?page=24&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/277057. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/277057?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-277057,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Marie-Sophie CHRIST}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/277057?page=24&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/277057?page=24&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 277057. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/277057. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}