Skip to content

Member

Willemien KONING

EPP · Netherlands

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Netherlands
Roll-call participation
93.6 %ⓘ of 2 047 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
96.0 %ⓘ of 1 917 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
CDA Christen Democratisch Appèl
In office
Since 3 Mar 2026
Against clear line
46 of 1 838 votesⓘ
Committees
AFCO (substitute), AGRI, ITRE, PECH (substitute), TRAN
Member id
276060
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

93.6 %

1 917 of 2 047 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 89.9 % (+3.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

96.0 %

1 841 of 1 917 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.6 % (+2.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.5 %

46 of 1 838 votes where their group had a clear line

35 opposite (for ↔ against), 11 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.6 %

30 of 1 917 votes cast

Participation 93.6 % — EPP median 89.9 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Willemien KONING93.6 %
EPP median89.9 %
Lowest in the group17.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members196
With majority line 96.0 % — EPP median 93.6 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Willemien KONING96.0 %
EPP median93.6 %
Lowest in the group70.2 %
Highest in the group99.5 %
Members196
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 2 047

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 7, adding text after recital A 118 for, 405 against, 86 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 4 to paragraph 11 164 for, 418 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 9 150 for, 423 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 3 to paragraph 8 171 for, 428 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 6 283 for, 262 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Separate vote on paragraph 6 450 for, 63 against, 96 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 4 97 for, 436 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 4 123 for, 378 against, 105 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 162 for, 425 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 161 for, 428 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 3 72 for, 476 against, 68 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 528 for, 21 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies Amendment 1, adding text after recital Z 277 for, 246 against, 90 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies Paragraph 18 — part 1 444 for, 153 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies Amendment 3 to paragraph 17 217 for, 306 against, 86 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies Amendment 2 to paragraph 16 247 for, 334 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies Paragraph 8 — part 2 455 for, 147 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 460 for, 71 against, 88 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges Amendment 1, adding text after recital H 174 for, 410 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges Amendment 2 to paragraph 3 159 for, 426 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 602 for, 9 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 6, adding text after recital E 181 for, 426 against, 0 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 5, adding text after recital E 182 for, 422 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 4, adding text after recital E 186 for, 423 against, 0 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 3, adding text after recital E 182 for, 425 against, 0 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 2, adding text after recital E 180 for, 419 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 1, adding text after citation 13 183 for, 421 against, 0 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 37 176 for, 431 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 32 178 for, 435 against, 0 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 32 181 for, 421 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 32 182 for, 415 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 27 173 for, 433 against, 0 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 11 to paragraph 26 170 for, 426 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 12 181 for, 417 against, 0 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 10 173 for, 426 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 367 for, 166 against, 84 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 23, adding text after recital S 132 for, 472 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Recital R — part 3 457 for, 138 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Recital R — part 2 441 for, 148 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Recital R — part 1 562 for, 34 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 92, adding text after recital O 170 for, 441 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Recital O — part 2 478 for, 116 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Recital O — part 1 539 for, 77 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 62 to recital O 132 for, 472 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Recital N — part 2 443 for, 161 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Recital J — part 2 422 for, 172 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Recital J — part 1 573 for, 43 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 90, adding text after recital H 178 for, 430 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 7, adding text after recital F 106 for, 511 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 88, adding text after recital D 193 for, 412 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 26 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
9 Mar 202610
10 Mar 2026197197
11 Mar 20266060
12 Mar 20263434
25 Mar 202633
26 Mar 20266969
27 Apr 202622
28 Apr 2026225224
29 Apr 2026296295
30 Apr 20266868
18 May 202644
19 May 202633
20 May 20269695
21 May 20269898
15 Jun 202622
16 Jun 20264040
17 Jun 2026127127
18 Jun 20267776
6 Jul 202622
7 Jul 20267272
8 Jul 2026144144
9 Jul 20266767
14 Sept 202611
15 Sept 2026155154
16 Sept 20268080
17 Sept 20261240

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Jeroen LENAERS EPPNetherlands100 % of 1 911 shared89 %
Ingeborg TER LAAK EPPNetherlands100 % of 1 910 shared89 %
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA EPPRomania98 % of 855 shared89 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany98 % of 1 680 shared89 %
Siegfried MUREŞAN EPPRomania97 % of 1 838 shared89 %
Niels GEUKING EPPGermany96 % of 1 897 shared89 %
Mika AALTOLA EPPFinland96 % of 1 450 shared89 %
Daniel BUDA EPPRomania96 % of 1 898 shared89 %
Dennis RADTKE EPPGermany96 % of 1 309 shared89 %
Sandra KALNIETE EPPLatvia96 % of 1 830 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Anna STÜRGKH RenewAustria90 % of 588 shared82 %
Sophie WILMÈS RenewBelgium89 % of 1 562 shared82 %
Jeannette BALJEU RenewNetherlands89 % of 1 310 shared82 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands88 % of 1 176 shared82 %
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia88 % of 1 561 shared82 %
Olivier CHASTEL RenewBelgium88 % of 1 643 shared82 %
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia88 % of 1 310 shared82 %
Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON RenewFinland88 % of 1 661 shared82 %
Elsi KATAINEN RenewFinland88 % of 1 908 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland88 % of 1 529 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO CommitteeSubstitute4 Mar 2026now
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI CommitteeMember12 Mar 2026now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeMember9 Mar 2026now
Committee on FisheriesPECH CommitteeSubstitute11 Mar 2026now
Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN CommitteeMember9 Mar 2026now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN DelegationMember9 Mar 2026now
Delegation for Northern cooperation and for relations with Switzerland and Norway and to the EU-Iceland Joint Parliamentary Committee and the European Economic Area (EEA) Joint Parliamentary CommitteeDEEA DelegationSubstitute4 Mar 2026now

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
EU Ports StrategyShadow rapporteurTRAN3 Sept 2026

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

4 contributions recorded; 4 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 4 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 4

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
19 Aug 2026Framework and support for small-scale EU coastal fishers in relation to emerging bluefin tuna stocks in the North Sea E-10-2026-003298Written questionwith 2 co-authorsNot yet answered
1 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation (EU) of 27 March 2026 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/688 as regards infection with bluetongue virus (serotypes 1-24) and infection with epizootic haemorrhagic disease virus and introducing a derogation for movements of registered equine animals B-10-2026-0342Motion for a resolutionwith 40 co-authors—
24 Jun 2026Timeline and scope of the forthcoming simplification package on fisheries legislation to support the competitiveness of the EU fleet E-10-2026-002596Written questionwith 13 co-authors20 Aug 2026
7 May 2026Aviation fuel shortage E-10-2026-001884Written questionwith 3 co-authors15 Jun 2026

Show all 4 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 37

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
17 Jul 2026Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agriculture AGRI-AM-791100 AGRI6
13 Jul 2026Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790934 CJ534
13 Jul 2026Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790935 CJ539
13 Jul 2026Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790936 CJ536
13 Jul 2026Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790937 CJ538
13 Jul 2026Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790939 CJ534
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790919 AGRI2
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790954 AGRI5
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790956 AGRI1
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790915 AGRI1

Show all 37 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Willemien KONING”. Member record. memberId 276060. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/276060?page=38&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/276060. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/276060?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-276060,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Willemien KONING}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/276060?page=38&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/276060?page=38&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 276060. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/276060. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}