Member

Rada LAYKOVA

ESN · Bulgaria

Group: ESN
Country: Bulgaria
Roll-call participation: 78.3 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line: 96.6 %ⓘ of 2 262 votes where the group had a line · ESN median 94.9 %

More facts (5)

National party: Revival
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 49 of 2 153 votesⓘ
Committees: ECON, IMCO (substitute)
Member id: 257262

National party: Revival
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 49 of 2 153 votesⓘ
Committees: ECON, IMCO (substitute)
Member id: 257262

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

78.3 %

2 263 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

ESN median: 90.3 % (−12.0 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

96.6 %

2 185 of 2 262 votes where their group had a line

ESN median: 94.9 % (+1.7 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.3 %

49 of 2 153 votes where their group had a clear line

18 opposite (for ↔ against), 20 abstained against the line, 11 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

11.1 %

251 of 2 263 votes cast

Participation 78.3 % — ESN median 90.3 %, 27 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Rada LAYKOVA	78.3 %
ESN median	90.3 %
Lowest in the group	55.1 %
Highest in the group	99.3 %
Members	27

With majority line 96.6 % — ESN median 94.9 %, 27 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Rada LAYKOVA	96.6 %
ESN median	94.9 %
Lowest in the group	68.9 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	27

2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of ESN; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 15 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2025	2	0
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	45
10 Feb 2025	1	1
11 Feb 2025	32	32
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	30
10 Mar 2025	2	0
11 Mar 2025	9	8
12 Mar 2025	228	224
13 Mar 2025	24	24
31 Mar 2025	3	0
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	250
3 Apr 2025	62	62
5 May 2025	5	0
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	218
8 May 2025	103	103
21 May 2025	2	1
22 May 2025	53	53
16 Jun 2025	2	0
17 Jun 2025	41	41
18 Jun 2025	91	91
19 Jun 2025	87	84
7 Jul 2025	1	0
8 Jul 2025	55	54
9 Jul 2025	134	133
10 Jul 2025	36	35
8 Sept 2025	1	0
9 Sept 2025	101	98
10 Sept 2025	34	31
11 Sept 2025	69	68
6 Oct 2025	2	0
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	54
9 Oct 2025	65	63
20 Oct 2025	3	0
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	179
23 Oct 2025	55	55
13 Nov 2025	267	0
24 Nov 2025	3	0
25 Nov 2025	75	0
26 Nov 2025	100	0
27 Nov 2025	125	0
15 Dec 2025	4	0
16 Dec 2025	66	66
17 Dec 2025	43	42
18 Dec 2025	42	42

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ESN

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Christine ANDERSON	Christine ANDERSON	ESN	Germany	95 % of 4 576 shared	80 %
Select Hans NEUHOFF	Hans NEUHOFF	ESN	Germany	94 % of 3 909 shared	80 %
Select Marc JONGEN	Marc JONGEN	ESN	Germany	94 % of 4 307 shared	80 %
Select Irmhild BOSSDORF	Irmhild BOSSDORF	ESN	Germany	94 % of 4 677 shared	80 %
Select Anja ARNDT	Anja ARNDT	ESN	Germany	94 % of 4 509 shared	80 %
Select Stanislav STOYANOV	Stanislav STOYANOV	ESN	Bulgaria	94 % of 4 534 shared	80 %
Select Petr BYSTRON	Petr BYSTRON	ESN	Germany	94 % of 4 186 shared	80 %
Select Alexander SELL	Alexander SELL	ESN	Germany	94 % of 4 466 shared	80 %
Select René AUST	René AUST	ESN	Germany	94 % of 4 513 shared	80 %
Select Arno BAUSEMER	Arno BAUSEMER	ESN	Germany	93 % of 4 166 shared	80 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Volker SCHNURRBUSCH	Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group	ESN	Germany	95 % of 228 shared	49 %
Select Milan MAZUREK	Milan MAZUREK changed group	ESN	Slovakia	76 % of 485 shared	49 %
Select Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK	Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group	Patriots	Poland	76 % of 1 081 shared	70 %
Select Georg MAYER	Georg MAYER	Patriots	Austria	74 % of 4 323 shared	70 %
Select Anna BRYŁKA	Anna BRYŁKA changed group	Patriots	Poland	74 % of 4 342 shared	69 %
Select Gerald HAUSER	Gerald HAUSER	Patriots	Austria	74 % of 4 613 shared	70 %
Select Mieke ANDRIESE	Mieke ANDRIESE	Patriots	Netherlands	74 % of 2 157 shared	70 %
Select Petra STEGER	Petra STEGER	Patriots	Austria	74 % of 4 768 shared	70 %
Select Guillaume PELTIER	Guillaume PELTIER	ECR	France	74 % of 4 295 shared	64 %
Select Roman HAIDER	Roman HAIDER	Patriots	Austria	74 % of 4 900 shared	70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with Central AsiaDCAS Delegation	Substitute	3 Oct 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	2 Oct 2024

Show all 5 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Official delegation	ECON	13 Jan 2026
Amending Directive (EU) 2020/262 as regards the general arrangements for excise duty in respect of tobacco and tobacco related products	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	19 Nov 2025
European Central Bank – annual report 2025	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	17 Nov 2025
European Central Bank – annual report 2025	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	7 Nov 2025
Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	7 Nov 2025
Collection of statistical information by the European Central Bank	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	3 Oct 2025
Establishment of the digital euro	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	2 Jul 2025
Legal tender of euro banknotes and coins	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	2 Jul 2025
Bulgaria's adoption of the euro on 1 January 2026	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	6 Jun 2025
Implementation of the Recovery and Resilience Facility	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	4 Feb 2025

Show all 15 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

31 contributions recorded; 13 on behalf of their group; 47 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
15 Sept 2026	Hybrid attacks against the EU Member States (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Presentation of the Action Plan on Cybersecurity and AI (debate) on behalf of ESN	Speech · 2 min	Read
6 Jul 2026	Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025 (debate) on behalf of ESN	Speech · 2 min	Read
16 Jun 2026	An EU future for the Western Balkans (joint debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
16 Jun 2026	Achieving digital sovereignty and resilience for Europe, in light of recent developments affecting access to advanced AI technologies (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Jun 2026	Achieving digital sovereignty and resilience for Europe, in light of recent developments affecting access to advanced AI technologies (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
27 Apr 2026	Financial literacy and the rise of finfluencers in the context of the savings and investments union (debate) on behalf of ESN	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	European Semester (joint debate) on behalf of ESN	Speech · 2 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	Single Market: how to move from an incomplete single market to one market for one Europe (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Feb 2026	European Central Bank – annual report 2025 (debate) on behalf of ESN	Speech · 2 min	Read

Show all 31 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 26

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
31 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373	Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors	—
15 Jul 2026	Decision of the Supreme Court of Bulgaria regarding the Euroins Romania case E-10-2026-002973	Written question	4 Sept 2026
11 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on politically motivated banking B-10-2026-0283	Motion for a resolutionwith 15 co-authors	—
10 Jun 2026	Digital euro acceptance requirements in the corresponding Commission proposal E-10-2026-002402	Written question	13 Aug 2026
20 May 2026	Follow-up on Oberbank’s decision to stop providing cash services and possible action by the Commission E-10-2026-002094	Written question	27 Jul 2026
8 Apr 2026	Union Resettlement and Humanitarian Admission Framework Regulation E-10-2026-001410	Written questionwith 25 co-authors	18 Jun 2026
5 Mar 2026	Anti-fascist movements and political violence – the real threat to democracy E-10-2026-000925	Written questionwith 62 co-authors	29 Apr 2026
3 Mar 2026	Three years since the railway accident in Tempi, Greece O-10-2026-000010	Oral questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
25 Feb 2026	Derogation for Bulgaria from the requirement to receive relocated migrants P-10-2026-000804	Priority written questionwith 2 co-authors	24 Apr 2026
4 Feb 2026	Legal basis and extent of EU debt: facilities for Ukraine, Moldova and the Balkans E-10-2026-000444	Written questionwith 15 co-authors	29 Jun 2026

Show all 26 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 6

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
19 Dec 2025	Establishment of the digital euro ECON-AM-781235	ECON	2
19 Dec 2025	Legal tender of euro banknotes and coins ECON-AM-781237	ECON	16
19 Dec 2025	Establishment of the digital euro ECON-AM-781499	ECON	1
19 Dec 2025	Establishment of the digital euro ECON-AM-781500	ECON	9
19 Dec 2025	Establishment of the digital euro ECON-AM-781501	ECON	7
11 Nov 2025	European Central Bank – annual report 2025 ECON-AM-779370	ECON	35

Show all 6 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Europe of Sovereign Nations ESN · Far-right · ultranationalism

National delegation

Delegation Bulgaria National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257262?period=2025&rows=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Rada LAYKOVA”. Member record. memberId 257262. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257262?period=2025&rows=all&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257262. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257262?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-257262,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Rada LAYKOVA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257262?period=2025&rows=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257262?period=2025&rows=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257262. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257262. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within ESN

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 26

Amendments tabled in committee, 6

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928