Member

Pasquale TRIDICO

The Left · Italy

Group: The Left
Country: Italy
Roll-call participation: 78.5 %ⓘ of 293 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.5 % · 2025, final votes
With majority line: 89.9 %ⓘ of 228 votes where the group had a line · The Left median 88.6 %

More facts (5)

National party: M5S Movimento 5 Stelle
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 12 of 198 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO (substitute), CONT, ECON, TRAN (substitute)
Member id: 257133

National party: M5S Movimento 5 Stelle
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 12 of 198 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO (substitute), CONT, ECON, TRAN (substitute)
Member id: 257133

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

78.5 %

230 of 293 final votes while in office

The Left median: 87.4 % (−8.9 pts)

Chamber median: 91.5 %

With majority line ⓘ

89.9 %

205 of 228 votes where their group had a line

The Left median: 88.6 % (+1.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

6.1 %

12 of 198 votes where their group had a clear line

4 opposite (for ↔ against), 7 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

17.4 %

40 of 230 votes cast

Participation 78.5 % — The Left median 87.4 %, 47 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 47 members of the The Left with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Pasquale TRIDICO	78.5 %
The Left median	87.4 %
Lowest in the group	10.2 %
Highest in the group	99.3 %
Members	47

With majority line 89.9 % — The Left median 88.6 %, 46 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 46 members of the The Left with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Pasquale TRIDICO	89.9 %
The Left median	88.6 %
Lowest in the group	64.9 %
Highest in the group	94.7 %
Members	46

2025, 293 final votes; 293 of 371 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of The Left; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 7 of 38 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	1	1
23 Jan 2025	4	4
11 Feb 2025	4	1
12 Feb 2025	4	4
13 Feb 2025	2	0
11 Mar 2025	4	4
12 Mar 2025	7	6
13 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	7	7
2 Apr 2025	9	9
3 Apr 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	4	4
7 May 2025	20	20
8 May 2025	12	11
22 May 2025	6	5
17 Jun 2025	8	8
18 Jun 2025	7	7
19 Jun 2025	6	5
8 Jul 2025	8	8
9 Jul 2025	14	14
10 Jul 2025	7	7
9 Sept 2025	6	0
10 Sept 2025	15	0
11 Sept 2025	8	0
7 Oct 2025	4	0
8 Oct 2025	10	0
9 Oct 2025	10	0
21 Oct 2025	8	8
22 Oct 2025	6	6
23 Oct 2025	5	5
13 Nov 2025	16	16
25 Nov 2025	13	13
26 Nov 2025	10	10
27 Nov 2025	11	10
16 Dec 2025	11	11
17 Dec 2025	11	11
18 Dec 2025	6	6

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within The Left

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Carolina MORACE	Carolina MORACE	The Left	Italy	99 % of 5 282 shared	87 %
Select Valentina PALMISANO	Valentina PALMISANO	The Left	Italy	99 % of 5 304 shared	87 %
Select Gaetano PEDULLA'	Gaetano PEDULLA'	The Left	Italy	99 % of 5 168 shared	87 %
Select Mario FURORE	Mario FURORE	The Left	Italy	99 % of 4 812 shared	87 %
Select Danilo DELLA VALLE	Danilo DELLA VALLE	The Left	Italy	99 % of 5 249 shared	87 %
Select Giuseppe ANTOCI	Giuseppe ANTOCI	The Left	Italy	99 % of 4 691 shared	87 %
Select Dario TAMBURRANO	Dario TAMBURRANO	The Left	Italy	99 % of 5 113 shared	87 %
Select Martin GÜNTHER	Martin GÜNTHER	The Left	Germany	91 % of 2 762 shared	87 %
Select Elena KOUNTOURA	Elena KOUNTOURA	The Left	Greece	89 % of 3 695 shared	87 %
Select Ilaria SALIS	Ilaria SALIS	The Left	Italy	89 % of 4 631 shared	87 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Greens	Spain	82 % of 4 349 shared	77 %
Select Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Greens	Spain	80 % of 4 922 shared	77 %
Select Benedetta SCUDERI	Benedetta SCUDERI	Greens	Italy	80 % of 5 390 shared	77 %
Select Cristina GUARDA	Cristina GUARDA	Greens	Italy	80 % of 4 561 shared	77 %
Select David CORMAND	David CORMAND	Greens	France	78 % of 5 248 shared	77 %
Select Ignazio Roberto MARINO	Ignazio Roberto MARINO	Greens	Italy	78 % of 4 089 shared	77 %
Select Saskia BRICMONT	Saskia BRICMONT	Greens	Belgium	78 % of 5 045 shared	77 %
Select Mélissa CAMARA	Mélissa CAMARA	Greens	France	78 % of 4 780 shared	77 %
Select Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ	Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ	Greens	Spain	78 % of 4 294 shared	77 %
Select Leoluca ORLANDO	Leoluca ORLANDO	Greens	Italy	78 % of 4 689 shared	77 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO Committee	Substitute	6 Jul 2026	now
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Subcommittee on Tax MattersFISC Subcommittee	Chair	23 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Caribbean-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDCAB Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working group	Member	19 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on Fighting against PovertyIG10-12 Intergroup / working group	Member	3 Mar 2026	now

Show all 16 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - Commission	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	10 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	10 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - Committee of the Regions	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	10 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - Court of Auditors	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	10 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - European External Action Service	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	10 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - European Data Protection Supervisor	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	10 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - Court of Justice of the European Union	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	10 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - European Council and Council	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	10 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - European Economic and Social Committee	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	10 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - European Ombudsman	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	10 Sept 2026

Show all 69 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

30 contributions recorded; 8 on behalf of their group; 40 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	State of the Union (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Jul 2026	Provision of digital euro services by payment services providers incorporated in Member States whose currency is not the euro and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1230 of the European Parliament and the Council (A10-0183/2026 - Fernando Navarrete Rojas) (vote) on behalf of The Left	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Jun 2026	Time for European economic independence (debate) on behalf of The Left	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 May 2026	The attack against citizens in Modena: protecting public spaces and preventing violence in the EU (debate) on behalf of The Left	Speech · 1 min	Read
28 Apr 2026	Discharge 2024 (joint debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
28 Apr 2026	Discharge 2024 (joint debate)	Speech · 4 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Urgent actions to revive EU competitiveness, deepen the EU Single Market and reduce the cost of living - from the Draghi report to reality (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Feb 2026	European Central Bank – annual report 2025 (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 Jan 2026	European Council meeting (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Dec 2025	Incentivising defence-related investments in the EU budget to implement the ReArm Europe Plan (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 30 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 111

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
7 Sept 2026	Transparency in the banking market and possible breach of the passivity rule in the Intesa Sanpaolo-MPS case E-10-2026-003528	Written questionwith 1 co-author	Not yet answered
22 Jul 2026	Cutro shipwreck, tragedies at sea and the right of vicitms’ families E-10-2026-003097	Written questionwith 23 co-authors	22 Sept 2026
7 Jul 2026	RAI’s independence and financial viability in Europe’s pluralistic media landscape E-10-2026-002809	Written questionwith 6 co-authors	4 Sept 2026
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
25 Jun 2026	The recent coercive measures imposed by the United States against Cuba, their extraterritorial nature and the measures to be adopted to defend the interests of individuals and companies from EU countries O-10-2026-000029	Oral questionwith 27 co-authors	Not yet answered
24 Jun 2026	ECB’s decision to raise interest rates and its impact on the rising cost of living O-10-2026-000028	Oral questionwith 39 co-authors	Not yet answered
22 Jun 2026	Official communications on CAP funds and correct information on the origin of EU resources E-10-2026-002569	Written questionwith 6 co-authors	18 Aug 2026
16 Jun 2026	Promoting ‘freedom to stay’ for the completion of the single market for a more resilient Europe and a locally anchored industrial policy E-10-2026-002476	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	4 Sept 2026
12 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba B-10-2026-0289	Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors	—
10 Jun 2026	Potential conflict of interest in the appointment of the Special Envoy for Industrial AI P-10-2026-002401	Priority written questionwith 37 co-authors	13 Aug 2026

Show all 111 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 60

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
31 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1095/2010, No 648/2012, No 600/2014, No 909/2014, 2015/2365, 2019/1156, 2021/23, 2022/858, 2023/1114, No 1060/2009, 2016/1011, 2017/2402, 2023/2631 and 2024/3005 as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791136	ECON	1
31 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1095/2010, No 648/2012, No 600/2014, No 909/2014, 2015/2365, 2019/1156, 2021/23, 2022/858, 2023/1114, No 1060/2009, 2016/1011, 2017/2402, 2023/2631 and 2024/3005 as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791103	ECON	4
31 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1095/2010, No 648/2012, No 600/2014, No 909/2014, 2015/2365, 2019/1156, 2021/23, 2022/858, 2023/1114, No 1060/2009, 2016/1011, 2017/2402, 2023/2631 and 2024/3005 as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791137	ECON	3
27 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2009/65/EC, 2011/61/EU and 2014/65/EU as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791126	ECON	3
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791128	JURI	1
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – ‘EU Inc.’ JURI-AM-791129	JURI	14
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791131	JURI	5
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791130	JURI	14
20 Jul 2026	Settlement finality and repealing Directive 98/26/EC and amending Directive 2002/47/EC on financial collateral arrangements ECON-AM-791082	ECON	1
10 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2019/631 as regards CO2 emission performance standards for new light duty vehicles and vehicle labelling and repealing Directive 1999/94/EC ENVI-AM-789913	ENVI	1

Show all 60 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political groups this term

Group The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL) The Left · Left · democratic socialism, communism

National delegation

Delegation Italy National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257133?period=2025&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Pasquale TRIDICO”. Member record. memberId 257133. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257133?period=2025&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257133. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257133?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-257133,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Pasquale TRIDICO}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257133?period=2025&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257133?period=2025&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257133. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257133. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within The Left

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 111

Amendments tabled in committee, 60

Connections

Political groups this term

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928