Member

Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIU

ECR · Romania

Group: ECR
Country: Romania
Roll-call participation: 98.5 %ⓘ of 2 521 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.9 % · 2026, roll calls
With majority line: 86.9 %ⓘ of 2 478 votes where the group had a line · ECR median 90.5 %

More facts (5)

National party: ACT Partidul Acțiunea Conservatoare
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 189 of 2 154 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET (substitute), AGRI (substitute), ENVI (substitute), ITRE, SEDE (substitute)
Member id: 257114

National party: ACT Partidul Acțiunea Conservatoare
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 189 of 2 154 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET (substitute), AGRI (substitute), ENVI (substitute), ITRE, SEDE (substitute)
Member id: 257114

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

98.5 %

2 484 of 2 521 roll calls while in office

ECR median: 91.9 % (+6.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.9 %

With majority line ⓘ

86.9 %

2 154 of 2 478 votes where their group had a line

ECR median: 90.5 % (−3.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

8.8 %

189 of 2 154 votes where their group had a clear line

106 opposite (for ↔ against), 70 abstained against the line, 13 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

10.2 %

254 of 2 484 votes cast

Participation 98.5 % — ECR median 91.9 %, 81 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 81 members of the ECR with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIU	98.5 %
ECR median	91.9 %
Lowest in the group	47.8 %
Highest in the group	99.9 %
Members	81

With majority line 86.9 % — ECR median 90.5 %, 81 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 81 members of the ECR with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIU	86.9 %
ECR median	90.5 %
Lowest in the group	63.8 %
Highest in the group	94.3 %
Members	81

2026, 2 521 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of ECR; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 0 of 34 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	67	66
21 Jan 2026	112	108
22 Jan 2026	58	56
9 Feb 2026	2	2
10 Feb 2026	38	38
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	141
24 Feb 2026	43	42
9 Mar 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	197	197
11 Mar 2026	60	59
12 Mar 2026	34	34
25 Mar 2026	3	3
26 Mar 2026	69	67
27 Apr 2026	2	2
28 Apr 2026	225	219
29 Apr 2026	296	294
30 Apr 2026	68	58
18 May 2026	4	4
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	96
21 May 2026	98	98
15 Jun 2026	2	2
16 Jun 2026	40	40
17 Jun 2026	127	124
18 Jun 2026	77	77
6 Jul 2026	2	2
7 Jul 2026	72	72
8 Jul 2026	144	143
9 Jul 2026	67	67
14 Sept 2026	1	1
15 Sept 2026	155	153
16 Sept 2026	80	80
17 Sept 2026	124	122

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ECR

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Şerban Dimitrie STURDZA	Şerban Dimitrie STURDZA	ECR	Romania	93 % of 4 981 shared	81 %
Select Gheorghe PIPEREA	Gheorghe PIPEREA	ECR	Romania	88 % of 4 666 shared	81 %
Select Adrian-George AXINIA	Adrian-George AXINIA	ECR	Romania	88 % of 4 780 shared	81 %
Select Ivaylo VALCHEV	Ivaylo VALCHEV	ECR	Bulgaria	87 % of 5 454 shared	81 %
Select Stephen Nikola BARTULICA	Stephen Nikola BARTULICA	ECR	Croatia	86 % of 4 668 shared	81 %
Select Diego SOLIER	Diego SOLIER changed group	ECR	Spain	86 % of 5 125 shared	81 %
Select Paolo INSELVINI	Paolo INSELVINI	ECR	Italy	85 % of 5 181 shared	81 %
Select Nora JUNCO GARCÍA	Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group	ECR	Spain	85 % of 4 930 shared	81 %
Select Alessandro CIRIANI	Alessandro CIRIANI	ECR	Italy	85 % of 4 818 shared	81 %
Select Waldemar TOMASZEWSKI	Waldemar TOMASZEWSKI	ECR	Lithuania	85 % of 3 900 shared	81 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Diego SOLIER	Diego SOLIER changed group	ECR	Spain	81 % of 207 shared	48 %
Select Nora JUNCO GARCÍA	Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group	ECR	Spain	76 % of 264 shared	48 %
Select Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS	Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS	No group	Romania	73 % of 4 650 shared	48 %
Select Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ	Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ	Patriots	Portugal	72 % of 5 327 shared	68 %
Select Antonín STANĚK	Antonín STANĚK	Patriots	Czechia	72 % of 3 437 shared	68 %
Select Nikola BARTŮŠEK	Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group	ECR	Czechia	72 % of 4 559 shared	62 %
Select Anna BRYŁKA	Anna BRYŁKA changed group	Patriots	Poland	72 % of 5 043 shared	67 %
Select Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL	Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL	Patriots	Spain	71 % of 4 940 shared	68 %
Select Paolo BORCHIA	Paolo BORCHIA	Patriots	Italy	71 % of 5 479 shared	68 %
Select Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN	Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN	Patriots	Spain	71 % of 5 546 shared	68 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI Committee	Substitute	11 Mar 2026	now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee	Member	11 Mar 2026	now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE Committee	Substitute	23 Jan 2025	now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committee	Substitute	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation to the EU-Türkiye Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-TR Joint parliamentary committee	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-MD Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI Committee	Member	20 Jan 2025	10 Mar 2026
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food SafetyENVI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	19 Jan 2025

Show all 11 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Official delegation	AGRI	15 Sept 2026
Establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activities	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	ITRE	22 May 2026
Institutional aspects of the Common European Defence Union	Shadow rapporteur	SEDE	19 Mar 2026
Amending Directives (EU) 2018/2001, (EU) 2019/944, (EU) 2024/1788 as regards acceleration of permit-granting procedures	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	ENVI	11 Mar 2026
EU agri-food promotion policy	Shadow rapporteur	AGRI	10 Feb 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 as regards the school fruit, vegetables and milk scheme (‘EU school scheme’), sectoral interventions, the creation of a protein sector, requirements for hemp, the possibility for marketing standards for cheese, protein crops and meat, application of additional import duties, rules on the availability of supplies in time of emergencies and severe crisis and securities	Shadow rapporteur	AGRI	29 Jan 2026
Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	11 Dec 2025
EU FARM AND FOOD PRODUCTS - REVIEW OF POLICY ON PROMOTION INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE EU	Shadow rapporteur	AGRI	10 Feb 2025
Standing rapporteur on Vietnam (AFET)	Rapporteur	AFET	9 Dec 2024

Show all 9 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

43 contributions recorded; 3 on behalf of their group; 61 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
7 Jul 2026	Presentation of the Action Plan on Cybersecurity and AI (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Electrification Action Plan (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 May 2026	Recent proposals to fight poverty in the EU (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Mar 2026	Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	Presentation of the Energy Package (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
9 Mar 2026	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Feb 2026	Building a stronger European defence in light of an increasingly volatile international environment (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Feb 2026	Amending Regulations on agricultural products as regards market rules and sectoral support measures in the wine sector and for aromatised wine products (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
21 Jan 2026	Presentation of the Digital Networks Act (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 68

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
8 Sept 2026	Supporting the adoption of new technologies by small and medium-sized enterprises in less developed Member States E-10-2026-003536	Written question	Not yet answered
8 Sept 2026	Energy security, electricity prices and the role of the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators in Romania E-10-2026-003535	Written question	Not yet answered
4 Sept 2026	Clarifications on the measures for the control and eradication of the PPR virus and the conditions for the resumption of sheep and goat exports from Romania P-10-2026-003510	Priority written question	Not yet answered
15 Jul 2026	Proportionality of restrictions on Romanian sheep and goat exports P-10-2026-002940	Priority written question	19 Aug 2026
14 Jul 2026	Transparency and subsidiarity safeguards for LGBTIQ-related funding under AgoraEU and CERV+ E-10-2026-002903	Written questionwith 11 co-authors	25 Aug 2026
18 Jun 2026	Inclusion of surrogacy in the new EU strategy to combat trafficking in human beings E-10-2026-002535	Written questionwith 19 co-authors	4 Aug 2026
18 Jun 2026	Use of European Social Fund Plus resources to finance abortion, and the definition of healthcare E-10-2026-002536	Written questionwith 16 co-authors	24 Sept 2026
11 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on politically motivated banking B-10-2026-0283	Motion for a resolutionwith 15 co-authors	—
11 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ending ideological flag displays on the premises of European Union institutions B-10-2026-0284	Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors	—
10 Jun 2026	Request for support – EU strategy for peace and the relaunch of negotiations on the war in Ukraine P-10-2026-002400	Priority written question	16 Jul 2026

Show all 68 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 86

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
17 Jul 2026	Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agriculture AGRI-AM-791100	AGRI	39
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790955	AGRI	2
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790917	AGRI	12
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790954	AGRI	4
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790919	AGRI	5
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790918	AGRI	8
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790964	AGRI	1
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790957	AGRI	11
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790915	AGRI	2
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790916	AGRI	8

Show all 86 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political groups this term

Group European Conservatives and Reformists ECR · Right-wing · national conservatism, EU-critical

National delegation

Delegation Romania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257114?period=2026&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIU”. Member record. memberId 257114. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257114?period=2026&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257114. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257114?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-257114,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIU}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257114?period=2026&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257114?period=2026&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257114. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257114. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within ECR

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 68

Amendments tabled in committee, 86

Connections

Political groups this term

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928