Member

Sérgio GONÇALVES

S&D · Portugal

Group: S&D
Country: Portugal
Roll-call participation: 98.3 %ⓘ of 516 roll calls in office · chamber median 93.4 % · 2024 (from july), roll calls
With majority line: 97.6 %ⓘ of 507 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 95.3 %

More facts (5)

National party: PS Partido Socialista
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 9 of 493 votesⓘ
Committees: PECH (substitute), REGI, TRAN
Member id: 257079

National party: PS Partido Socialista
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 9 of 493 votesⓘ
Committees: PECH (substitute), REGI, TRAN
Member id: 257079

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes66 All roll calls516

Roll-call participation ⓘ

98.3 %

507 of 516 roll calls while in office

S&D median: 93.4 % (+4.8 pts)

Chamber median: 93.4 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.6 %

495 of 507 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 95.3 % (+2.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.8 %

9 of 493 votes where their group had a clear line

5 opposite (for ↔ against), 3 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

1.6 %

8 of 507 votes cast

Participation 98.3 % — S&D median 93.4 %, 137 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Sérgio GONÇALVES	98.3 %
S&D median	93.4 %
Lowest in the group	2.1 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	137

With majority line 97.6 % — S&D median 95.3 %, 136 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 136 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Sérgio GONÇALVES	97.6 %
S&D median	95.3 %
Lowest in the group	70.4 %
Highest in the group	99.5 %
Members	136

2024 (from July), 516 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 22 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	23	20
18 Jul 2024	1	1
16 Sept 2024	2	2
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	92	92
7 Oct 2024	2	2
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	18	17
10 Oct 2024	4	4
21 Oct 2024	2	0
22 Oct 2024	10	10
23 Oct 2024	129	126
24 Oct 2024	13	13
13 Nov 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	36	36
25 Nov 2024	2	2
26 Nov 2024	18	18
27 Nov 2024	11	11
28 Nov 2024	57	57
17 Dec 2024	13	13
18 Dec 2024	33	33
19 Dec 2024	45	45

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES	André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES	S&D	Portugal	99 % of 4 959 shared	93 %
Select Isilda GOMES	Isilda GOMES	S&D	Portugal	99 % of 5 120 shared	93 %
Select Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	S&D	Spain	99 % of 5 317 shared	93 %
Select Carla TAVARES	Carla TAVARES	S&D	Portugal	99 % of 5 314 shared	93 %
Select Francisco ASSIS	Francisco ASSIS	S&D	Portugal	99 % of 4 671 shared	93 %
Select Camilla LAURETI	Camilla LAURETI	S&D	Italy	98 % of 5 630 shared	93 %
Select Ana Catarina MENDES	Ana Catarina MENDES	S&D	Portugal	98 % of 5 207 shared	93 %
Select Marta TEMIDO	Marta TEMIDO	S&D	Portugal	98 % of 5 246 shared	93 %
Select Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ	Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ	S&D	Lithuania	98 % of 5 443 shared	93 %
Select Alicia HOMS GINEL	Alicia HOMS GINEL	S&D	Spain	98 % of 4 865 shared	93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Elisabetta GUALMINI	Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group	Renew	Italy	91 % of 1 758 shared	86 %
Select Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Renew	Belgium	90 % of 4 131 shared	86 %
Select Ľudovít ÓDOR	Ľudovít ÓDOR	Renew	Slovakia	90 % of 5 391 shared	86 %
Select Dainius ŽALIMAS	Dainius ŽALIMAS	Renew	Lithuania	90 % of 5 385 shared	86 %
Select Jana TOOM	Jana TOOM	Renew	Estonia	90 % of 4 940 shared	86 %
Select Bernard GUETTA	Bernard GUETTA	Renew	France	90 % of 5 113 shared	86 %
Select Marjan ŠAREC	Marjan ŠAREC	Renew	Slovenia	90 % of 5 137 shared	86 %
Select Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Renew	Netherlands	90 % of 5 675 shared	86 %
Select Pascal CANFIN	Pascal CANFIN	Renew	France	90 % of 5 195 shared	86 %
Select Valérie HAYER	Valérie HAYER	Renew	France	90 % of 5 488 shared	86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on FisheriesPECH Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committee	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with South AfricaD-ZA Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Caribbean-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDCAB Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Cohesion Policy and Outermost RegionsIG10-08 Intergroup / working group	Member	25 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on Seas, Rivers, Islands and Coastal Areas (SEARICA)IG10-20 Intergroup / working group	Member	4 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)IG10-22 Intergroup / working group	Member	12 Mar 2025	now

Show all 10 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Official delegation	REGI	17 Sept 2026
EU Ports Strategy	Rapporteur	TRAN	30 Jul 2026
EP Delegation to the conciliation committee on Air Passenger Rights 2013/0072	Trilogue negotiator		11 Feb 2026
Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	REGI	28 Jan 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	TRAN	16 Dec 2025
6th EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership Assembly	Official delegation	D-UK	21 Oct 2025
Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities	Opinion rapporteur	TRAN	21 Oct 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation	REGI	9 Sept 2025
Amending Directive 2014/45/EU on periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers and Directive 2014/47/EU on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Union	Shadow rapporteur	TRAN	10 Jul 2025
Amending Regulations (EU) 2021/694, (EU) 2021/695, (EU) 2021/697, (EU) 2021/1153, (EU) 2023/1525 and 2024/795, as regards incentivising defence-related investments in the EU budget to implement the ReArm Europe Plan	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	TRAN	17 Jun 2025

Show all 21 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

22 contributions recorded; 4 on behalf of their group; 25 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
9 Jul 2026	Evaluation of the common fisheries policy and follow-up (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	The resilience of the European transport sector and the need to ensure the supply of essential goods amid ongoing geopolitical instability (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 May 2026	Periodic roadworthiness tests and technical roadside inspection (Roadworthiness package) (A10-0139/2026 - Jens Gieseke) (vote) on behalf of S&D	Speech · 1 min	Read
30 Apr 2026	Women’s entrepreneurship in rural and island areas and outermost regions (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Mar 2026	Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Mar 2026	Package travel and linked travel arrangements: make the protection of travellers more effective and simplify and clarify certain aspects (debate) on behalf of S&D	Speech · 1 min	Read
27 Nov 2025	Development of an industry for sustainable aviation and maritime fuel in Europe (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
12 Nov 2025	European Maritime Safety Agency (short presentation)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 Oct 2025	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Sept 2025	Package travel and linked travel arrangements: make the protection of travellers more effective and simplify and clarify certain aspects (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 22 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 36

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
15 Jul 2026	Arbitrary preventive arrest of the leader of the opposition in Guinea-Bissau, Domingos Simões Pereira P-10-2026-002953	Priority written questionwith 7 co-authors	7 Aug 2026
3 Jul 2026	Revision of Directive 92/83/EEC to exempt traditional sugar cane spirits produced on a small scale E-10-2026-002769	Written question	26 Aug 2026
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
17 Jun 2026	Dynamic pricing for major sporting and cultural events E-10-2026-002518	Written questionwith 35 co-authors	15 Sept 2026
3 Jun 2026	EU support for the healthcare systems of the EU’s outermost regions E-10-2026-002261	Written question	15 Jul 2026
27 May 2026	Right to stay strategy and the outermost regions E-10-2026-002158	Written questionwith 1 co-author	8 Jul 2026
17 Apr 2026	Taxation of windfall profits in the energy sector O-10-2026-000019	Oral questionwith 53 co-authors	Not yet answered
25 Mar 2026	Commission’s participation in US Board of Peace meeting on Gaza E-10-2026-001240	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	8 Jun 2026
18 Mar 2026	Rising cost of fuels and the impact on the fishing sector E-10-2026-001125	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	12 May 2026
16 Dec 2025	The future of sustainable fuels in the EU’s outermost regions E-10-2025-004966	Written questionwith 1 co-author	12 Mar 2026
9 Dec 2025	EU funding and future use of hydrogen refuelling stations for heavy-duty vehicles (HDV) E-10-2025-004867	Written questionwith 4 co-authors	5 Mar 2026
3 Dec 2025	Local authorities’ access to EU funds in the new multiannual financial framework proposal E-10-2025-004780	Written question	16 Feb 2026
3 Dec 2025	Access of outermost regions to the EU Civil Protection Mechanism training programme E-10-2025-004779	Written question	23 Jan 2026
20 Nov 2025	Support for cross-border night trains in Europe P-10-2025-004634	Priority written questionwith 15 co-authors	9 Mar 2026
12 Nov 2025	Madeira International Business Centre E-10-2025-004484	Written question	17 Dec 2025
12 Nov 2025	Distribution of rescEU aerial firefighting fleet E-10-2025-004487	Written question	6 Feb 2026
22 Oct 2025	EU emissions trading system for maritime transport – application of the outermost regions derogation to multi‑leg itineraries E-10-2025-004153	Written questionwith 1 co-author	19 Jan 2026
1 Oct 2025	Protecting EU maritime waters E-10-2025-003811	Written question	1 Dec 2025
1 Oct 2025	Safeguarding Article 349 TFEU and the rights of the outermost regions E-10-2025-003812	Written question	20 Nov 2025
19 Sept 2025	Suspension of the EU-Qatar agreement on air transport O-10-2025-000031	Oral questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
9 Sept 2025	Protection of journalists and investigation into killings in Gaza E-10-2025-003482	Written questionwith 108 co-authors	4 Nov 2025
6 May 2025	Adoption of targeted sanctions against military individuals responsible for lethal attacks on civilians and other serious human rights violations in Sudan E-10-2025-001817	Written questionwith 19 co-authors	16 Jun 2025
29 Apr 2025	Tackling aviation contrails E-10-2025-001706	Written questionwith 2 co-authors	10 Jul 2025
29 Apr 2025	ETS maritime surcharges E-10-2025-001705	Written questionwith 2 co-authors	16 Jun 2025
24 Apr 2025	Enforcement of the Digital Services Act (DSA) E-10-2025-001646	Written questionwith 12 co-authors	22 Jul 2025
24 Apr 2025	Safeguarding long-term cohesion policy investments E-10-2025-001657	Written question	16 Jun 2025
24 Apr 2025	Changes to cohesion policy and their impact on regional disparity E-10-2025-001656	Written question	27 Jun 2025
7 Apr 2025	Taxation of big digital tech companies E-10-2025-001409	Written questionwith 38 co-authors	17 Jul 2025
27 Mar 2025	Mobility poverty in the EU’s outermost regions E-10-2025-001290	Written questionwith 1 co-author	16 Jun 2025
5 Mar 2025	Strengthening EU sanctions against the Russian shadow fleet by aligning with international partners E-10-2025-000937	Written questionwith 10 co-authors	14 Apr 2025
28 Feb 2025	Action plan on rare diseases E-10-2025-000886	Written questionwith 33 co-authors	26 Jun 2025
11 Feb 2025	Ongoing discrimination in online sales against remote and outermost regions of the EU E-10-2025-000630	Written question	24 Apr 2025
16 Jan 2025	Banana producers’ access to EU funds in Madeira E-10-2025-000171	Written question	24 Feb 2025
6 Nov 2024	EU support for Madeira wildfire recovery P-10-2024-002446	Priority written question	18 Dec 2024
30 Oct 2024	Support for the green transition in the EU’s outermost regions E-10-2024-002344	Written questionwith 1 co-author	18 Dec 2024
27 Sept 2024	Serious violations of the human rights of people in northern Mozambique by the Mozambican military P-10-2024-001864	Priority written questionwith 5 co-authors	30 Oct 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 78

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
7 Sept 2026	Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034 REGI-AM-792058	REGI	2
23 Jul 2026	Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791875	REGI	23
23 Jul 2026	Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791872	REGI	10
30 Jun 2026	Amending Regulations (EC) No 561/2006, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2019/2144 and (EU) 2024/1257 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the simplification of technical requirements and testing procedures for motor vehicles and repealing Council Directive 70/157/EEC and Regulation No 540/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council CJ76-AM-789167	CJ76	3
26 Jun 2026	Amending Regulations (EC) No 561/2006, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2019/2144 and (EU) 2024/1257 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the simplification of technical requirements and testing procedures for motor vehicles and repealing Council Directive 70/157/EEC and Regulation No 540/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council CJ76-AM-789933	CJ76	23
26 Jun 2026	Amending Regulations (EC) No 561/2006, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2019/2144 and (EU) 2024/1257 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the simplification of technical requirements and testing procedures for motor vehicles and repealing Council Directive 70/157/EEC and Regulation No 540/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council CJ76-AM-789089	CJ76	4
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790103	CJ71	6
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790101	CJ71	1
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790102	CJ71	1
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790097	CJ71	5

Show all 78 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats S&D · Centre-left · social democracy

National delegation

Delegation Portugal National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257079?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Sérgio GONÇALVES”. Member record. memberId 257079. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257079?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257079. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257079?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-257079,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Sérgio GONÇALVES}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257079?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257079?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257079. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257079. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within S&D

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 36

Amendments tabled in committee, 78

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928