Member

Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO

EPP · Spain

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Spain
Roll-call participation: 88.9 %ⓘ of 261 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.8 % · 2026, final votes
With majority line: 94.0 %ⓘ of 232 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 94.9 %

More facts (5)

National party: PP Partido Popular
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 10 of 223 votesⓘ
Committees: FEMM (substitute), PETI, REGI, SANT
Member id: 257039

National party: PP Partido Popular
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 10 of 223 votesⓘ
Committees: FEMM (substitute), PETI, REGI, SANT
Member id: 257039

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

88.9 %

232 of 261 final votes while in office

EPP median: 91.2 % (−2.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.8 %

With majority line ⓘ

94.0 %

218 of 232 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 94.9 % (−1.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.5 %

10 of 223 votes where their group had a clear line

3 opposite (for ↔ against), 7 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

3.9 %

9 of 232 votes cast

Participation 88.9 % — EPP median 91.2 %, 187 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 187 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO	88.9 %
EPP median	91.2 %
Lowest in the group	3.8 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	187

With majority line 94.0 % — EPP median 94.9 %, 185 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 185 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO	94.0 %
EPP median	94.9 %
Lowest in the group	73.6 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	185

2026, 261 final votes; 261 of 342 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: For ≠ group	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: For ≠ group	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 26 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	6	6
21 Jan 2026	8	7
22 Jan 2026	8	8
10 Feb 2026	8	8
11 Feb 2026	10	10
12 Feb 2026	8	8
24 Feb 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	9	8
11 Mar 2026	12	12
12 Mar 2026	6	6
26 Mar 2026	13	13
28 Apr 2026	14	13
29 Apr 2026	17	15
30 Apr 2026	11	10
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	12
21 May 2026	10	8
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	16
18 Jun 2026	7	7
7 Jul 2026	15	15
8 Jul 2026	15	0
9 Jul 2026	4	0
15 Sept 2026	12	12
16 Sept 2026	16	15
17 Sept 2026	10	9

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA	Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA	EPP	Spain	99 % of 1 579 shared	89 %
Select Maravillas ABADÍA JOVER	Maravillas ABADÍA JOVER	EPP	Spain	98 % of 4 976 shared	89 %
Select Fernando NAVARRETE ROJAS	Fernando NAVARRETE ROJAS	EPP	Spain	98 % of 5 085 shared	89 %
Select Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE	Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE	EPP	Spain	98 % of 4 606 shared	89 %
Select Carmen CRESPO DÍAZ	Carmen CRESPO DÍAZ	EPP	Spain	98 % of 4 506 shared	89 %
Select Gabriel MATO	Gabriel MATO	EPP	Spain	98 % of 4 687 shared	89 %
Select Borja GIMÉNEZ LARRAZ	Borja GIMÉNEZ LARRAZ	EPP	Spain	98 % of 5 142 shared	89 %
Select Susana SOLÍS PÉREZ	Susana SOLÍS PÉREZ	EPP	Spain	98 % of 4 451 shared	89 %
Select Javier ZARZALEJOS	Javier ZARZALEJOS	EPP	Spain	97 % of 5 028 shared	89 %
Select Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA	Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA	EPP	Spain	97 % of 4 854 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	84 % of 4 716 shared	82 %
Select Andreas GLÜCK	Andreas GLÜCK	Renew	Germany	83 % of 3 494 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	83 % of 4 584 shared	82 %
Select Bart GROOTHUIS	Bart GROOTHUIS	Renew	Netherlands	83 % of 3 886 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	83 % of 5 102 shared	82 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	83 % of 4 095 shared	82 %
Select Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Renew	Germany	82 % of 5 102 shared	82 %
Select Jeannette BALJEU	Jeannette BALJEU	Renew	Netherlands	82 % of 4 583 shared	82 %
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Renew	Romania	82 % of 3 855 shared	82 %
Select Olivier CHASTEL	Olivier CHASTEL	Renew	Belgium	82 % of 4 819 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on PetitionsPETI Committee	Member	8 Sept 2025	now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Public HealthSANT Committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America, including the EU-Central America Association Parliamentary CommitteeDCAM Delegation	Vice-chair	8 Jul 2025	now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assembly	Vice-chair	30 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Attracting Investment to Ensure a Competitive and Sustainable European UnionIG10-03 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Biodiversity, Hunting and CountrysideIG10-04 Intergroup / working group	Member	4 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on Cancer and Rare DiseasesIG10-05 Intergroup / working group	Member	27 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Cohesion Policy and Outermost RegionsIG10-08 Intergroup / working group	Member	25 Feb 2025	now

Show all 20 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Mission to Santa Cruz de Tenerife (Spain)	Official delegation	DLAT	11 Sept 2026
Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2025	Shadow rapporteur	PETI	11 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	REGI	10 Jul 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	SANT	25 Jun 2026
EuroLat Parliamentary Assembly meetings in Mexico City (26-28 May 2026)	Official delegation	DLAT	12 May 2026
EU rare disease action plan	Shadow rapporteur	SANT	6 Mar 2026
EU rare disease action plan	Shadow rapporteur	SANT	28 Jan 2026
Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	TRAN	28 Jan 2026
Establishing the European Social Fund as part of the National and Regional Partnership Plan set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRPPlan] establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to quality employment, skills and social inclusion for the period from 2028 to 2034	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	REGI	16 Jan 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	REGI	28 Jul 2025

Show all 20 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

38 contributions recorded; 2 on behalf of their group; 53 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
17 Sept 2026	An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
16 Sept 2026	Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Devastating heatwaves, wildfires and droughts in Europe: lessons from summer 2026 (debate)	Speech	Read
15 Sept 2026	Devastating heatwaves, wildfires and droughts in Europe: lessons from summer 2026 (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Political prisoners in Nicaragua – the cases of Carlos Brenes, Salvadora del Socorro Martínez Aburto and Brooklyn Rivera	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 May 2026	The Union’s preparedness for and response to health emergencies: the case of the MV Hondius and the hantavirus warning (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
19 May 2026	Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
12 Mar 2026	Prevention and treatment of obesity (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
12 Mar 2026	Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024 (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
9 Feb 2026	World Cancer Day (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read

Show all 38 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 54

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
16 Sept 2026	Gender gap in cardiovascular health and clinical research E-10-2026-003707	Written question	Not yet answered
1 Jul 2026	Procedure for banning monacolin K E-10-2026-002725	Written questionwith 3 co-authors	Not yet answered
24 Jun 2026	Continuity in mental health initiatives E-10-2026-002598	Written question	24 Aug 2026
15 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Nicaragua – the cases of Carlos Brenes, Salvadora del Socorro Martínez Aburto and Brooklyn Rivera B-10-2026-0292	Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors	—
12 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba B-10-2026-0285	Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors	—
9 Jun 2026	Strengthening prevention, mental well-being and healthy ageing through improved hearing health E-10-2026-002380	Written questionwith 15 co-authors	21 Aug 2026
5 May 2026	NextGenerationEU funds in Spain E-10-2026-001831	Written questionwith 4 co-authors	16 Sept 2026
5 May 2026	NextGenerationEU funds in Spain E-10-2026-001830	Written questionwith 4 co-authors	27 Jul 2026
27 Mar 2026	Ensuring that the fight against cancer remains a priority in the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) 2028-2034 E-10-2026-001292	Written question	4 Jun 2026
27 Mar 2026	Strategic autonomy of the European Union and preparedness for health crises in the next multiannual financial framework E-10-2026-001291	Written question	15 Jun 2026

Show all 54 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 139

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
16 Sept 2026	Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034 REGI-AM-792057	REGI	17
11 Sept 2026	Modernised rules for patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare SANT-AM-792154	SANT	4
11 Sept 2026	Modernised rules for patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare SANT-AM-792014	SANT	12
10 Sept 2026	Amending Directives 2001/18/EC and 2010/53/EU as regards the placing on the market of genetically modified micro-organisms and the processing of organs CJ64-AM-792138	CJ64	3
10 Sept 2026	Amending Directives 2001/18/EC and 2010/53/EU as regards the placing on the market of genetically modified micro-organisms and the processing of organs CJ64-AM-792139	CJ64	5
7 Sept 2026	Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034 REGI-AM-792058	REGI	21
27 Aug 2026	Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791869	REGI	6
28 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2017/746 as regards simplifying and reducing the burden of the rules on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices, and amending Regulation (EU) 2022/123 as regards the support of the European Medicines Agency for the expert panels on medical devices and Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as regards the list of Union harmonisation legislation referred to in its Annex I SANT-AM-791887	SANT	9
28 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2017/746 as regards simplifying and reducing the burden of the rules on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices, and amending Regulation (EU) 2022/123 as regards the support of the European Medicines Agency for the expert panels on medical devices and Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as regards the list of Union harmonisation legislation referred to in its Annex I SANT-AM-791890	SANT	3
28 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2017/746 as regards simplifying and reducing the burden of the rules on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices, and amending Regulation (EU) 2022/123 as regards the support of the European Medicines Agency for the expert panels on medical devices and Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as regards the list of Union harmonisation legislation referred to in its Annex I SANT-AM-791891	SANT	6

Show all 139 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Spain National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257039?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO”. Member record. memberId 257039. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257039?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257039. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257039?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-257039,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257039?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257039?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257039. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257039. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 54

Amendments tabled in committee, 139

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928