Member

Michalis HADJIPANTELA

EPP · Cyprus

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Cyprus
Roll-call participation: 86.1 %ⓘ of 2 521 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.9 % · 2026, roll calls
With majority line: 92.2 %ⓘ of 2 170 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.7 %

More facts (5)

National party: DI.SY. Democratic Rally
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 132 of 2 084 votesⓘ
Committees: BUDG (substitute), ECON, ENVI (substitute), ITRE (substitute), SANT
Member id: 256985

National party: DI.SY. Democratic Rally
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 132 of 2 084 votesⓘ
Committees: BUDG (substitute), ECON, ENVI (substitute), ITRE (substitute), SANT
Member id: 256985

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

86.1 %

2 170 of 2 521 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 91.0 % (−4.9 pts)

Chamber median: 90.9 %

With majority line ⓘ

92.2 %

2 000 of 2 170 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.7 % (−1.6 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

6.3 %

132 of 2 084 votes where their group had a clear line

85 opposite (for ↔ against), 47 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

2.9 %

62 of 2 170 votes cast

Participation 86.1 % — EPP median 91.0 %, 189 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 189 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Michalis HADJIPANTELA	86.1 %
EPP median	91.0 %
Lowest in the group	2.5 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	189

With majority line 92.2 % — EPP median 93.7 %, 188 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 188 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Michalis HADJIPANTELA	92.2 %
EPP median	93.7 %
Lowest in the group	70.9 %
Highest in the group	99.9 %
Members	188

2026, 2 521 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 9 of 34 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	67	67
21 Jan 2026	112	112
22 Jan 2026	58	58
9 Feb 2026	2	0
10 Feb 2026	38	38
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	88
24 Feb 2026	43	43
9 Mar 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	197	195
11 Mar 2026	60	60
12 Mar 2026	34	34
25 Mar 2026	3	3
26 Mar 2026	69	69
27 Apr 2026	2	0
28 Apr 2026	225	224
29 Apr 2026	296	295
30 Apr 2026	68	65
18 May 2026	4	0
19 May 2026	3	0
20 May 2026	96	0
21 May 2026	98	0
15 Jun 2026	2	0
16 Jun 2026	40	40
17 Jun 2026	127	124
18 Jun 2026	77	0
6 Jul 2026	2	0
7 Jul 2026	72	72
8 Jul 2026	144	144
9 Jul 2026	67	67
14 Sept 2026	1	1
15 Sept 2026	155	153
16 Sept 2026	80	80
17 Sept 2026	124	124

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Loucas FOURLAS	Loucas FOURLAS	EPP	Cyprus	97 % of 3 767 shared	89 %
Select Eleonora MELETI	Eleonora MELETI	EPP	Greece	94 % of 4 113 shared	89 %
Select Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS	Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS	EPP	Greece	93 % of 4 578 shared	89 %
Select Dimitris TSIODRAS	Dimitris TSIODRAS	EPP	Greece	93 % of 4 780 shared	89 %
Select Georgios AFTIAS	Georgios AFTIAS	EPP	Greece	93 % of 4 385 shared	89 %
Select Vangelis MEIMARAKIS	Vangelis MEIMARAKIS	EPP	Greece	93 % of 4 308 shared	89 %
Select Fredis BELERIS	Fredis BELERIS	EPP	Greece	93 % of 4 255 shared	89 %
Select Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI	Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI	EPP	Greece	92 % of 3 434 shared	89 %
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	92 % of 4 293 shared	89 %
Select Siegfried MUREŞAN	Siegfried MUREŞAN	EPP	Romania	92 % of 5 005 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	84 % of 4 683 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	83 % of 4 509 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	82 % of 5 005 shared	82 %
Select Sophie WILMÈS	Sophie WILMÈS	Renew	Belgium	82 % of 3 639 shared	82 %
Select Bart GROOTHUIS	Bart GROOTHUIS	Renew	Netherlands	82 % of 3 838 shared	82 %
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Renew	Romania	82 % of 3 813 shared	82 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	82 % of 3 990 shared	82 %
Select Elsi KATAINEN	Elsi KATAINEN	Renew	Finland	82 % of 5 149 shared	82 %
Select Dan NICA	Dan NICA	S&D	Romania	82 % of 3 285 shared	75 %
Select Benoit CASSART	Benoit CASSART	Renew	Belgium	82 % of 4 696 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on BudgetsBUDG Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI Committee	Substitute	20 Jan 2025	now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Public HealthSANT Committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	now
Subcommittee on Tax MattersFISC Subcommittee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with IranD-IR Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Attracting Investment to Ensure a Competitive and Sustainable European UnionIG10-03 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now

Show all 18 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Official delegation	ECON	14 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	ENVI	1 Jul 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	SANT	29 Jun 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	ECON	29 Jun 2026
No dossier named	Opinion rapporteur	SANT	22 Jun 2026
No dossier named	Opinion rapporteur	ENVI	17 Jun 2026
91st EU-US INTER-PARLIAMENTARY MEETING OF THE TRANSLANTIC LEGISLATORS DIALOGUE 19-20 JUNE CYPRUS	Official delegation	D-US	15 Jun 2026
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund: assistance to Romania regarding the floods at the end of May 2025, Cyprus following the wildfires in July 2025 and Spain following the wildfires in August 2025	Shadow rapporteur	BUDG	3 Jun 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	BUDG	13 May 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	ENVI	11 Mar 2026

Show all 49 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

37 contributions recorded; 3 on behalf of their group; 55 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	Presentation by the Council of its position on the draft general budget - 2027 financial year (debate)	Speech · 3 min	Read
14 Sept 2026	Emissions trading (joint debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Jul 2026	Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitiveness (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF): access to VAT information at Union level (A10-0159/2026 - Michalis Hadjipantela) (vote)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Jun 2026	2025 Commission report on Türkiye (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
30 Apr 2026	Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European Parliament (A10-0124/2026 - Michalis Hadjipantela) (vote)	Speech · 2 min	Read
28 Apr 2026	Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Mar 2026	EUCO and situation in the Middle East (joint debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
9 Feb 2026	World Cancer Day (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 Jan 2026	Presentation of the programme of activities of the Cyprus Presidency (continuation of debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read

Show all 37 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 48

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
7 Sept 2026	Polisario Front E-10-2026-003521	Written questionwith 9 co-authors	Not yet answered
16 Jul 2026	Ensuring the continued operation of the Blue Flag Programme under Directive (EU) 2024/825 E-10-2026-003031	Written questionwith 29 co-authors	18 Sept 2026
30 Jun 2026	Implementation of new pharmaceutical legislation E-10-2026-002706	Written question	3 Sept 2026
4 Jun 2026	Economic support for the tourism sector in Cyprus P-10-2026-002313	Priority written question	8 Jul 2026
7 Apr 2026	Illegal quarrying in the occupied areas of Cyprus E-10-2026-001399	Written question	22 May 2026
7 Apr 2026	Non-recognition of degree from institution recognised by the European Higher Education Area E-10-2026-001400	Written question	10 Jun 2026
18 Mar 2026	Foot-and-mouth disease and issues regarding practical implementation of the legislation E-10-2026-001111	Written question	8 May 2026
25 Feb 2026	Foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in Cyprus P-10-2026-000777	Priority written question	23 Apr 2026
8 Dec 2025	Ban on the sale of nitrous oxide to the general public O-10-2025-000046	Oral questionwith 42 co-authors	Not yet answered
19 Nov 2025	Potential inclusion of Pernambuco in Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora Appendix I and safeguarding European cultural heritage E-10-2025-004606	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	21 Jan 2026

Show all 48 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 112

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
11 Sept 2026	Modernised rules for patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare SANT-AM-792014	SANT	2
11 Sept 2026	Modernised rules for patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare SANT-AM-792154	SANT	2
15 Jul 2026	General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections SANT-AM-789117	SANT	1
15 Jul 2026	Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden ENVI-AM-790846	ENVI	1
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790935	CJ53	2
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790958	AGRI	1
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790936	CJ53	5
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790938	CJ53	6
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790934	CJ53	2
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790933	CJ53	1

Show all 112 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Cyprus National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256985?period=2026&scope=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Michalis HADJIPANTELA”. Member record. memberId 256985. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256985?period=2026&scope=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256985. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256985?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-256985,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Michalis HADJIPANTELA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256985?period=2026&scope=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256985?period=2026&scope=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256985. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256985. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 48

Amendments tabled in committee, 112

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928