Skip to content

Member

Michalis HADJIPANTELA

EPP · Cyprus

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Cyprus
Roll-call participation
86.1 %ⓘ of 2 521 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.9 % · 2026, roll calls
With majority line
92.2 %ⓘ of 2 170 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.7 %
More facts (5)
National party
DI.SY. Democratic Rally
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
132 of 2 084 votesⓘ
Committees
BUDG (substitute), ECON, ENVI (substitute), ITRE (substitute), SANT
Member id
256985
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

86.1 %

2 170 of 2 521 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 91.0 % (−4.9 pts)

Chamber median: 90.9 %

With majority line ⓘ

92.2 %

2 000 of 2 170 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.7 % (−1.6 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

6.3 %

132 of 2 084 votes where their group had a clear line

85 opposite (for ↔ against), 47 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

2.9 %

62 of 2 170 votes cast

Participation 86.1 % — EPP median 91.0 %, 189 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 189 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Michalis HADJIPANTELA86.1 %
EPP median91.0 %
Lowest in the group2.5 %
Highest in the group100.0 %
Members189
With majority line 92.2 % — EPP median 93.7 %, 188 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 188 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Michalis HADJIPANTELA92.2 %
EPP median93.7 %
Lowest in the group70.9 %
Highest in the group99.9 %
Members188
  • 2026, 2 521 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H 181 for, 399 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G 252 for, 326 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3 381 for, 190 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2 338 for, 233 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1 524 for, 48 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E 84 for, 484 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D 193 for, 389 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D 89 for, 494 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C 204 for, 381 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C 215 for, 366 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C 209 for, 378 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C 95 for, 486 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B 345 for, 242 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A 459 for, 120 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5 439 for, 128 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1 392 for, 132 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15 448 for, 137 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2 297 for, 267 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 304 for, 268 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14 92 for, 496 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13 330 for, 250 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 93 for, 493 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 257 for, 331 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2 351 for, 232 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 195 for, 392 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12 390 for, 143 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4 441 for, 147 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3 427 for, 166 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12 231 for, 355 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 261 for, 335 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 259 for, 336 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 208 for, 382 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 235 for, 358 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 277 for, 321 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3 353 for, 240 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2 363 for, 231 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1 390 for, 205 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 203 for, 392 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9 266 for, 295 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8 215 for, 335 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8 261 for, 316 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 395 for, 204 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7 177 for, 418 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7 204 for, 395 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 202 for, 380 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7 253 for, 329 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 91 for, 503 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 261 for, 340 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 9 of 34 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Loucas FOURLAS EPPCyprus97 % of 3 767 shared89 %
Eleonora MELETI EPPGreece94 % of 4 113 shared89 %
Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS EPPGreece93 % of 4 578 shared89 %
Dimitris TSIODRAS EPPGreece93 % of 4 780 shared89 %
Georgios AFTIAS EPPGreece93 % of 4 385 shared89 %
Vangelis MEIMARAKIS EPPGreece93 % of 4 308 shared89 %
Fredis BELERIS EPPGreece93 % of 4 255 shared89 %
Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI EPPGreece92 % of 3 434 shared89 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany92 % of 4 293 shared89 %
Siegfried MUREŞAN EPPRomania92 % of 5 005 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia84 % of 4 683 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania83 % of 4 509 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium82 % of 5 005 shared82 %
Sophie WILMÈS RenewBelgium82 % of 3 639 shared82 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands82 % of 3 838 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania82 % of 3 813 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland82 % of 3 990 shared82 %
Elsi KATAINEN RenewFinland82 % of 5 149 shared82 %
Dan NICA S&DRomania82 % of 3 285 shared75 %
Benoit CASSART RenewBelgium82 % of 4 696 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on BudgetsBUDG CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeSubstitute20 Jan 2025now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Public HealthSANT CommitteeMember23 Jan 2025now
Subcommittee on Tax MattersFISC SubcommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with IranD-IR DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Attracting Investment to Ensure a Competitive and Sustainable European UnionIG10-03 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now

Show all 18 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationECON14 Sept 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionENVI1 Jul 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationSANT29 Jun 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationECON29 Jun 2026
No dossier namedOpinion rapporteurSANT22 Jun 2026
No dossier namedOpinion rapporteurENVI17 Jun 2026
91st EU-US INTER-PARLIAMENTARY MEETING OF THE TRANSLANTIC LEGISLATORS DIALOGUE 19-20 JUNE CYPRUSOfficial delegationD-US15 Jun 2026
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund: assistance to Romania regarding the floods at the end of May 2025, Cyprus following the wildfires in July 2025 and Spain following the wildfires in August 2025Shadow rapporteurBUDG3 Jun 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationBUDG13 May 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationENVI11 Mar 2026

Show all 49 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

37 contributions recorded; 3 on behalf of their group; 55 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 37 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 48

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
7 Sept 2026Polisario Front E-10-2026-003521Written questionwith 9 co-authorsNot yet answered
16 Jul 2026Ensuring the continued operation of the Blue Flag Programme under Directive (EU) 2024/825 E-10-2026-003031Written questionwith 29 co-authors18 Sept 2026
30 Jun 2026Implementation of new pharmaceutical legislation E-10-2026-002706Written question3 Sept 2026
4 Jun 2026Economic support for the tourism sector in Cyprus P-10-2026-002313Priority written question8 Jul 2026
7 Apr 2026Illegal quarrying in the occupied areas of Cyprus E-10-2026-001399Written question22 May 2026
7 Apr 2026Non-recognition of degree from institution recognised by the European Higher Education Area E-10-2026-001400Written question10 Jun 2026
18 Mar 2026Foot-and-mouth disease and issues regarding practical implementation of the legislation E-10-2026-001111Written question8 May 2026
25 Feb 2026Foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in Cyprus P-10-2026-000777Priority written question23 Apr 2026
8 Dec 2025Ban on the sale of nitrous oxide to the general public O-10-2025-000046Oral questionwith 42 co-authorsNot yet answered
19 Nov 2025Potential inclusion of Pernambuco in Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora Appendix I and safeguarding European cultural heritage E-10-2025-004606Written questionwith 13 co-authors21 Jan 2026
14 Nov 2025The unlawful confiscation of Baha’i properties in Iran E-10-2025-004551Written questionwith 17 co-authors5 Jan 2026
26 Sept 2025Türkiye’s misuse of EU Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance funds E-10-2025-003759Written questionwith 12 co-authors24 Nov 2025
23 Sept 2025GSI and the electricity interconnection of Cyprus E-10-2025-003673Written question4 Dec 2025
11 Sept 2025European aerial firefighting hub in Cyprus E-10-2025-003523Written question28 Nov 2025
8 Sept 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the detention of EU citizens in the occupied areas of Cyprus B-10-2025-0389Motion for a resolutionwith 21 co-authors—
1 Sept 2025Fire season and rescEU P-10-2025-003353Priority written question11 Nov 2025
25 Jul 2025Türkiye’s non-compliance with ECtHR judgments on Cyprus E-10-2025-003094Written question23 Dec 2025
22 Jul 2025Reassessing the timetable and safeguards for ETS2: preventing price shocks and ensuring social readiness E-10-2025-003032Written questionwith 48 co-authors12 Nov 2025
17 Jul 2025Study on the potential costs and impact of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) on the pharmaceutical and cosmetic sectors. E-10-2025-002988Written questionwith 24 co-authors26 Sept 2025
14 Jul 2025Advancing women’s health E-10-2025-002864Written question29 Sept 2025
10 Jul 2025Vessel exhaust testing E-10-2025-002819Written question27 Aug 2025
10 Jul 2025Renewed EU strategy for vaccination and to tackle vaccine hesitancy E-10-2025-002818Written question5 Sept 2025
7 Jul 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria, following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias church in Damascus B-10-2025-0346Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors—
2 Jul 2025Environmental protection in the UK Sovereign Base Areas in Cyprus E-10-2025-002682Written question3 Sept 2025
25 Jun 2025Effective monitoring of RRF disbursements E-10-2025-002544Written question28 Aug 2025
17 Jun 2025The role of local authorities in addressing the financial and operational challenges posed by PFAS and other persistent chemical contaminants in Europe E-10-2025-002429Written questionwith 20 co-authors26 Aug 2025
11 Jun 2025Addressing menstrual poverty and introducing an EU menstrual health strategy E-10-2025-002340Written questionwith 30 co-authors27 Aug 2025
11 Jun 2025Improving workplace health and safety to prevent deaths from sudden cardiac arrest E-10-2025-002329Written question16 Jul 2025
30 May 2025SAFE: no procurement in non-EU countries that contravene EU security interests E-10-2025-002181Written questionwith 1 co-author8 Sept 2025
6 May 2025Türkiye’s violation of Cyprus’s sovereignty E-10-2025-001827Written questionwith 1 co-author12 Jun 2025
8 Apr 2025Strengthening EU support for Cyprus in market surveillance of electrical appliances E-10-2025-001416Written question7 Jul 2025
2 Apr 2025The financing of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty E-10-2025-001357Written questionwith 38 co-authors3 Jun 2025
19 Mar 2025EU regulatory environment, artificial intelligence and competitiveness E-10-2025-001181Written question9 Jul 2025
19 Mar 2025Energy taxation rules E-10-2025-001180Written question2 Jun 2025
26 Feb 2025Rare diseases P-10-2025-000845Priority written questionwith 7 co-authors2 May 2025
21 Feb 2025Financial assistance for air carriers during the COVID-19 pandemic E-10-2025-000816Written question14 Apr 2025
20 Feb 2025Tsunami preparedness in the European Union E-10-2025-000787Written question2 May 2025
5 Feb 2025Delays in EFSA risk assessments E-10-2025-000501Written question29 Apr 2025
5 Feb 2025Overcoming challenges to Cyprus’s accession to the Schengen area E-10-2025-000502Written question16 Apr 2025
27 Nov 2024Takata airbag recall scandal E-10-2024-002668Written questionwith 3 co-authors14 Feb 2025
13 Nov 2024Timely implementation of Cyprus’s recovery and resilience plan E-10-2024-002508Written question31 Jan 2025
12 Nov 2024EU Solidarity Fund assistance for flood recovery in Paphos, Cyprus P-10-2024-002499Priority written question6 Jan 2025
12 Nov 2024Lack of EU funding for Cypriot refugees 50 years after the Turkish invasion E-10-2024-002500Written question9 Jan 2025
24 Sept 2024Hungary’s participation at the informal summit of the Organization of Turkic States E-10-2024-001800Written question14 Nov 2024
24 Sept 2024Azerbaijan’s invitation to the Turkish Cypriot leader as a ‘head of state’ to attend the informal summit of the Organization of Turkic States E-10-2024-001799Written question12 Nov 2024
24 Sept 2024Incident in the territory of the occupied Deryneia village E-10-2024-001802Written question29 Nov 2024
24 Sept 2024Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan’s participation in the informal meeting of EU Foreign Affairs Ministers in Brussels on 29 August E-10-2024-001805Written question12 Nov 2024
24 Sept 2024Construction and operation of a solar farm near the villages of Lythrodontas, Kataliontas and Mathiatis E-10-2024-001803Written question27 Nov 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 112

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
11 Sept 2026Modernised rules for patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare SANT-AM-792014 SANT2
11 Sept 2026Modernised rules for patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare SANT-AM-792154 SANT2
15 Jul 2026General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections SANT-AM-789117 SANT1
15 Jul 2026Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden ENVI-AM-790846 ENVI1
13 Jul 2026Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790935 CJ532
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790958 AGRI1
13 Jul 2026Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790936 CJ535
13 Jul 2026Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790938 CJ536
13 Jul 2026Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790934 CJ532
13 Jul 2026Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790933 CJ531

Show all 112 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Cyprus National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Michalis HADJIPANTELA”. Member record. memberId 256985. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256985?docs=all&period=2026&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256985. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256985?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256985,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Michalis HADJIPANTELA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256985?docs=all&period=2026&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256985?docs=all&period=2026&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256985. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256985. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}