Skip to content

Member · Former member

Carola RACKETE

The Left · Germany · left on 15 September 2025

Group
The Left
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
88.5 %ⓘ of 2 298 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
92.6 %ⓘ of 2 027 votes where the group had a line · The Left median 92.8 %
More facts (4)
National party
Independent
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 15 Sept 2025 (left on 15 September 2025)
Against clear line
76 of 1 866 votesⓘ
Member id
256927
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

88.5 %

2 033 of 2 298 roll calls while in office

The Left median: 88.5 % (±0.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

92.6 %

1 877 of 2 027 votes where their group had a line

The Left median: 92.8 % (−0.2 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.1 %

76 of 1 866 votes where their group had a clear line

20 opposite (for ↔ against), 44 abstained against the line, 12 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

6.0 %

121 of 2 033 votes cast

Participation 88.5 % — The Left median 88.5 %, 47 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 47 members of the The Left with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Carola RACKETE88.5 %
The Left median88.5 %
Lowest in the group44.2 %
Highest in the group99.3 %
Members47
With majority line 92.6 % — The Left median 92.8 %, 47 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 47 members of the The Left with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Carola RACKETE92.6 %
The Left median92.8 %
Lowest in the group81.9 %
Highest in the group96.9 %
Members47
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of The Left; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 2 298

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
23 Jan 2025Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 14 105 for, 468 against, 35 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine Paragraph 14 — part 2 469 for, 104 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine Paragraph 14 — part 1 505 for, 45 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine Amendment 6 to paragraph 14 141 for, 426 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
23 Jan 2025Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine Separate vote on paragraph 12 505 for, 51 against, 47 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine Paragraph 10 — part 7 484 for, 74 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine Paragraph 10 — part 6 415 for, 167 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine Paragraph 10 — part 5 424 for, 143 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine Paragraph 10 — part 4 428 for, 76 against, 103 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine Paragraph 10 — part 3 415 for, 169 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine Paragraph 10 — part 2 419 for, 172 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine Paragraph 10 — part 1 415 for, 164 against, 32 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 533 for, 24 against, 48 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria Amendment 1, adding text after recital D 113 for, 431 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 5 62 for, 540 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 5 135 for, 435 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 556 for, 6 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria Amendment 3 to paragraph 5 164 for, 435 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria Amendment 5 to paragraph 5 56 for, 546 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 2 109 for, 443 against, 61 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Paragraph 7 — part 2 437 for, 158 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 337 for, 246 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 456 for, 135 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Amendment 4 to paragraph 3 170 for, 396 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
23 Jan 2025Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 150 for, 448 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 7 162 for, 312 against, 137 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 272 for, 290 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2025Need for actions to address the continued oppression and fake elections in Belarus Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 567 for, 25 against, 66 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
22 Jan 2025Need for actions to address the continued oppression and fake elections in Belarus Amendments 4 + 7 (voted as one) to paragraph 19 429 for, 205 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 Jan 2025EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of Serbia Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 505 for, 90 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe The Left 196 for, 221 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PfE 108 for, 313 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 322 for, 163 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 1, adding text after recital K 197 for, 342 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on recital K 328 for, 143 against, 85 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on citation 14 310 for, 183 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 9 to paragraph 1, after point ar 170 for, 364 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on paragraph 1, point an 319 for, 183 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 5 364 for, 120 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 4 356 for, 157 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 3 328 for, 178 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 2 366 for, 116 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 1 492 for, 43 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 17 to paragraph 1, point al 154 for, 379 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 8 to paragraph 1, point ak 204 for, 355 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 7 to paragraph 1, after point ag 152 for, 383 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 6 to paragraph 1, point ag 210 for, 332 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 5 to paragraph 1, after point af 167 for, 384 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point af — part 2 271 for, 268 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point af — part 1 549 for, 14 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 15 of 56 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within The Left

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Ilaria SALIS The LeftItaly93 % of 1 761 shared87 %
Martin SCHIRDEWAN The LeftGermany92 % of 1 923 shared87 %
Estrella GALÁN The LeftSpain92 % of 1 861 shared87 %
Mimmo LUCANO The LeftItaly91 % of 1 121 shared87 %
Özlem DEMIREL The LeftGermany91 % of 1 760 shared87 %
Damien CARÊME The LeftFrance91 % of 1 969 shared87 %
Anthony SMITH The LeftFrance91 % of 2 013 shared87 %
Marina MESURE The LeftFrance91 % of 1 987 shared87 %
Arash SAEIDI The LeftFrance91 % of 1 807 shared87 %
Leila CHAIBI The LeftFrance91 % of 1 941 shared87 %

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Ana MIRANDA PAZ GreensSpain87 % of 1 997 shared77 %
Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ GreensSpain86 % of 1 795 shared77 %
Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ GreensSpain85 % of 1 966 shared77 %
Diana RIBA I GINER GreensSpain84 % of 1 663 shared77 %
Cristina GUARDA GreensItaly84 % of 1 492 shared77 %
Mélissa CAMARA GreensFrance84 % of 1 983 shared77 %
Benedetta SCUDERI GreensItaly83 % of 1 812 shared77 %
Ignazio Roberto MARINO GreensItaly83 % of 1 844 shared77 %
Leoluca ORLANDO GreensItaly83 % of 1 844 shared77 %
David CORMAND GreensFrance83 % of 1 961 shared77 %

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

21 contributions recorded; 5 on behalf of their group; 27 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
9 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine, the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
7 Jul 2025One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
2 Apr 2025Outcome of the recent COP16 biodiversity negotiations in Rome (debate) on behalf of The LeftSpeech · 1 minRead
13 Mar 2025A Vision for Agriculture and Food (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
13 Feb 2025EU-Mercosur Trade Agreement (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Feb 2025One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
10 Feb 2025The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: the need for the European Union to contribute to resolving the humanitarian crisis of persons missing in wars and conflicts (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Jan 2025Need to enforce the Digital Services Act to protect democracy on social media platforms including against foreign interference and biased algorithms (debate) on behalf of The LeftSpeech · 2 minRead
20 Jan 2025One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
20 Jan 2025Powering Europe’s future - advancing the fusion industry for energy independence and innovation (debate) on behalf of The LeftSpeech · 1 minRead

Show all 21 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 36

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
15 Sept 2025MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0402Motion for a resolutionwith 71 co-authors—
23 Jul 2025Infiltration and surveillance: risks to fundamental rights, democracy and political pluralism in Italy E-10-2025-003048Written questionwith 14 co-authors25 Nov 2025
8 Jul 2025Health access in Gaza and a corridor from Gaza to East Jerusalem hospitals E-10-2025-002776Written questionwith 28 co-authors9 Oct 2025
2 Jun 2025Access for humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip E-10-2025-002193Written questionwith 21 co-authors4 Aug 2025
28 May 2025Urgent activation of the EU Blocking Statute, as requested by Parliament in its 2024 annual report on human rights and democracy in the world E-10-2025-002163Written questionwith 21 co-authors30 Jul 2025
28 May 2025EU-Israel Association Agreement O-10-2025-000019Oral questionwith 39 co-authorsNot yet answered
28 May 2025Gaza: offer of EU assistance in sidelining UN humanitarian agencies and consultation with Palestinian counterparts E-10-2025-002153Written questionwith 27 co-authors15 Jul 2025
27 May 2025Israel’s intention to take full control of the Gaza strip and remove the Palestinian population from the area – EU’s actions and reactions E-10-2025-002127Written questionwith 24 co-authors1 Aug 2025
22 May 2025Proposed liquefied natural gas facility in Pesaro, Italy E-10-2025-002065Written question7 Jul 2025
16 May 2025Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan O-10-2025-000018Oral questionwith 6 co-authorsNot yet answered

Show all 36 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 9

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
21 May 2025Amending Directives 2006/43/EC, 2013/34/EU, (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements ENVI-AM-773311 ENVI26
21 May 2025Amending Directives 2006/43/EC, 2013/34/EU, (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements ENVI-AM-774216 ENVI40
20 May 2025The EU strategic objectives for the 20th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), to be held in to be held in Samarkand, Uzbekistan, from 24 November to 05 December 2025 ENVI-AM-773348 ENVI42
13 May 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain AGRI-AM-773314 AGRI11
24 Apr 2025The future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policy AGRI-AM-772125 AGRI8
24 Apr 2025The future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policy AGRI-AM-773080 AGRI7
24 Apr 2025The future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policy AGRI-AM-773077 AGRI12
24 Apr 2025The future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policy AGRI-AM-773078 AGRI7
24 Apr 2025The future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policy AGRI-AM-773079 AGRI3

Show all 9 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Carola RACKETE”. Member record. memberId 256927. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256927?nb=all&page=36&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256927. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256927?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256927,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Carola RACKETE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256927?nb=all&page=36&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256927?nb=all&page=36&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256927. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256927. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}