Member

Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN

S&D · France

Group: S&D
Country: France
Roll-call participation: 97.1 %ⓘ of 2 521 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.9 % · 2026, roll calls
With majority line: 91.9 %ⓘ of 2 448 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 95.8 %

More facts (5)

National party: Place publique
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 171 of 2 396 votesⓘ
Committees: CONT (substitute), ENVI (substitute), ITRE
Member id: 256903

National party: Place publique
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 171 of 2 396 votesⓘ
Committees: CONT (substitute), ENVI (substitute), ITRE
Member id: 256903

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

97.1 %

2 448 of 2 521 roll calls while in office

S&D median: 90.1 % (+7.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.9 %

With majority line ⓘ

91.9 %

2 249 of 2 448 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 95.8 % (−4.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

7.1 %

171 of 2 396 votes where their group had a clear line

147 opposite (for ↔ against), 20 abstained against the line, 4 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

2.0 %

50 of 2 448 votes cast

Participation 97.1 % — S&D median 90.1 %, 135 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 135 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN	97.1 %
S&D median	90.1 %
Lowest in the group	35.1 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	135

With majority line 91.9 % — S&D median 95.8 %, 135 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 135 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN	91.9 %
S&D median	95.8 %
Lowest in the group	83.7 %
Highest in the group	99.5 %
Members	135

2026, 2 521 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 34 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	67	63
21 Jan 2026	112	103
22 Jan 2026	58	55
9 Feb 2026	2	0
10 Feb 2026	38	38
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	139
24 Feb 2026	43	41
9 Mar 2026	1	0
10 Mar 2026	197	196
11 Mar 2026	60	57
12 Mar 2026	34	34
25 Mar 2026	3	3
26 Mar 2026	69	69
27 Apr 2026	2	2
28 Apr 2026	225	225
29 Apr 2026	296	287
30 Apr 2026	68	68
18 May 2026	4	4
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	92
21 May 2026	98	98
15 Jun 2026	2	2
16 Jun 2026	40	32
17 Jun 2026	127	125
18 Jun 2026	77	76
6 Jul 2026	2	2
7 Jul 2026	72	72
8 Jul 2026	144	136
9 Jul 2026	67	64
14 Sept 2026	1	1
15 Sept 2026	155	147
16 Sept 2026	80	78
17 Sept 2026	124	123

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	S&D	France	99 % of 5 187 shared	93 %
Select Aurore LALUCQ	Aurore LALUCQ	S&D	France	99 % of 4 612 shared	93 %
Select Emma RAFOWICZ	Emma RAFOWICZ	S&D	France	99 % of 4 113 shared	93 %
Select Christophe CLERGEAU	Christophe CLERGEAU	S&D	France	99 % of 4 943 shared	93 %
Select Murielle LAURENT	Murielle LAURENT	S&D	France	98 % of 5 332 shared	93 %
Select Eric SARGIACOMO	Eric SARGIACOMO	S&D	France	98 % of 5 444 shared	93 %
Select Pierre JOUVET	Pierre JOUVET	S&D	France	98 % of 4 943 shared	93 %
Select Nora MEBAREK	Nora MEBAREK	S&D	France	98 % of 5 249 shared	93 %
Select Claire FITA	Claire FITA	S&D	France	98 % of 4 532 shared	93 %
Select Chloé RIDEL	Chloé RIDEL	S&D	France	98 % of 3 687 shared	93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Catarina VIEIRA	Catarina VIEIRA	Greens	Netherlands	88 % of 5 285 shared	83 %
Select Terry REINTKE	Terry REINTKE	Greens	Germany	87 % of 5 304 shared	83 %
Select Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Greens	Netherlands	87 % of 5 299 shared	83 %
Select Bas EICKHOUT	Bas EICKHOUT Former member	Greens	Netherlands	87 % of 4 603 shared	83 %
Select Veronika CIFROVÁ OSTRIHOŇOVÁ	Veronika CIFROVÁ OSTRIHOŇOVÁ	Renew	Slovakia	87 % of 4 508 shared	86 %
Select Maria OHISALO	Maria OHISALO	Greens	Finland	87 % of 4 905 shared	83 %
Select Jutta PAULUS	Jutta PAULUS	Greens	Germany	87 % of 5 206 shared	83 %
Select Tineke STRIK	Tineke STRIK	Greens	Netherlands	87 % of 5 380 shared	83 %
Select Vladimir PREBILIČ	Vladimir PREBILIČ	Greens	Slovenia	87 % of 4 926 shared	83 %
Select Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Renew	Belgium	87 % of 4 097 shared	86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI Committee	Substitute	20 Jan 2025	now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committee	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE Delegation	Substitute	16 Jul 2024	now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group	Member	16 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Attracting Investment to Ensure a Competitive and Sustainable European UnionIG10-03 Intergroup / working group	Chair co	31 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working group	Member	19 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on Resilience, Disaster Management and Civil ProtectionIG10-19 Intergroup / working group	Member	17 Mar 2025	now
Intergroup on Seas, Rivers, Islands and Coastal Areas (SEARICA)IG10-20 Intergroup / working group	Member	4 Feb 2025	now

Show all 13 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/631 as regards CO2 emission performance standards for new light duty vehicles and vehicle labelling and repealing Directive 1999/94/EC	Shadow rapporteur	ENVI	24 Mar 2026
Establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activities	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	26 Jan 2026
Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/888	Opinion rapporteur	CONT	19 Jan 2026
Phasing out Russian natural gas imports, improving monitoring of potential energy dependencies and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1938	Shadow rapporteur	ITRE	2 Jul 2025
Mr. Thomas Pellerin-Carlin as shadow rapporteur for the Security of energy supply in the EU, INI report	Shadow rapporteur	ITRE	5 Feb 2025

Show all 5 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

34 contributions recorded; 3 on behalf of their group; 37 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
7 Jul 2026	Urgent measures to strengthen the competitiveness and safeguard quality jobs in the EU’s automotive sector (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Urgent measures to strengthen the competitiveness and safeguard quality jobs in the EU’s automotive sector (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Urgent measures to strengthen the competitiveness and safeguard quality jobs in the EU’s automotive sector (debate)	Speech	Read
17 Jun 2026	Electrification Action Plan (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
27 Apr 2026	Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024 (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Mar 2026	Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Mar 2026	Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Mar 2026	Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate)	Speech	Read
11 Mar 2026	Building Europe's clean, independent and secure energy following the 2026 North Sea Summit (debate) on behalf of S&D	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Dec 2025	Presentation of the automotive package (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 34 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 61

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
14 Sept 2026	Exclusion of purchases of Russian sable pelts from EU sanctions E-10-2026-003651	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	Not yet answered
10 Sept 2026	EU exports of banned pesticides E-10-2026-003605	Written questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
2 Sept 2026	Protecting workers from extreme heatwaves E-10-2026-003456	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	Not yet answered
1 Sept 2026	Proposed sale of Everllence to Bain Capital and preservation of European industrial sovereignty E-10-2026-003416	Written question	Not yet answered
15 Jul 2026	Update by the Commission of its guidelines on tackling online disinformation during electoral processes E-10-2026-002950	Written questionwith 31 co-authors	11 Sept 2026
14 Jul 2026	Preserving EU capacities to produce paper pulp and cellulose fibres – state of affairs at Fibre Excellence P-10-2026-002901	Priority written questionwith 12 co-authors	12 Aug 2026
3 Jul 2026	Follow-up to the European Citizens’ Panel on Preparedness E-10-2026-002778	Written questionwith 9 co-authors	21 Aug 2026
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
19 Jun 2026	Ban the butt: it is time to stub out cigarette filters E-10-2026-002547	Written questionwith 9 co-authors	3 Sept 2026
18 Jun 2026	Human trafficking and human rights violations through recruitment of non-Russian nationals, in particular from Africa, for Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine E-10-2026-002532	Written questionwith 27 co-authors	6 Aug 2026

Show all 61 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 71

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
10 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2019/631 as regards CO2 emission performance standards for new light duty vehicles and vehicle labelling and repealing Directive 1999/94/EC ENVI-AM-789913	ENVI	20
18 Jun 2026	Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/631 as regards CO2 emission performance standards for new light duty vehicles and vehicle labelling and repealing Directive 1999/94/EC ENVI-AM-789910	ENVI	29
18 Jun 2026	Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/631 as regards CO2 emission performance standards for new light duty vehicles and vehicle labelling and repealing Directive 1999/94/EC ENVI-AM-789911	ENVI	24
18 Jun 2026	Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/631 as regards CO2 emission performance standards for new light duty vehicles and vehicle labelling and repealing Directive 1999/94/EC ENVI-AM-789912	ENVI	17
12 Jun 2026	Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/878988 CULT-AM-789967	CULT	1
5 Jun 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788898	ITRE	14
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788893	ITRE	6
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788896	ITRE	33
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788895	ITRE	16
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788899	ITRE	4

Show all 71 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats S&D · Centre-left · social democracy

National delegation

Delegation France National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256903?period=2026&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN”. Member record. memberId 256903. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256903?period=2026&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256903. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256903?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-256903,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256903?period=2026&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256903?period=2026&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256903. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256903. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within S&D

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 61

Amendments tabled in committee, 71

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928