Member

Petras GRAŽULIS

ESN · Lithuania

Group: ESN
Country: Lithuania
Roll-call participation: 83.5 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line: 68.9 %ⓘ of 2 412 votes where the group had a line · ESN median 94.9 %

More facts (5)

National party: TTS Tautos ir teisingumo sąjunga
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 665 of 2 300 votesⓘ
Committees: ITRE (substitute), PETI
Member id: 256808

National party: TTS Tautos ir teisingumo sąjunga
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 665 of 2 300 votesⓘ
Committees: ITRE (substitute), PETI
Member id: 256808

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

83.5 %

2 415 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

ESN median: 90.3 % (−6.7 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

68.9 %

1 663 of 2 412 votes where their group had a line

ESN median: 94.9 % (−26.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

28.9 %

665 of 2 300 votes where their group had a clear line

135 opposite (for ↔ against), 477 abstained against the line, 53 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

28.5 %

688 of 2 415 votes cast

Participation 83.5 % — ESN median 90.3 %, 27 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Petras GRAŽULIS	83.5 %
ESN median	90.3 %
Lowest in the group	55.1 %
Highest in the group	99.3 %
Members	27

With majority line 68.9 % — ESN median 94.9 %, 27 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Petras GRAŽULIS	68.9 %
ESN median	94.9 %
Lowest in the group	68.9 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	27

2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of ESN; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 46 — part 2	406 for, 214 against, 29 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 46 — part 1	470 for, 117 against, 63 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 45 — part 3	334 for, 270 against, 34 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 45 — part 2	327 for, 272 against, 42 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 45 — part 1	433 for, 153 against, 53 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on paragraph 44	349 for, 228 against, 79 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 43 — part 2	340 for, 285 against, 24 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 43 — part 1	358 for, 210 against, 81 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on paragraph 41	362 for, 214 against, 75 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 24 — part 2	337 for, 303 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 24 — part 1	532 for, 42 against, 82 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 21 — part 2	433 for, 135 against, 65 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 21 — part 1	548 for, 37 against, 60 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 19	215 for, 294 against, 144 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 19	278 for, 304 against, 69 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 18 — part 3	399 for, 182 against, 72 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 18 — part 2	299 for, 354 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 18 — part 1	435 for, 197 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 16 — part 4	353 for, 224 against, 63 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 16 — part 3	330 for, 256 against, 57 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 16 — part 2	339 for, 302 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 16 — part 1	539 for, 20 against, 88 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 8 — part 3	388 for, 169 against, 88 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 8 — part 2	472 for, 133 against, 45 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 8 — part 1	501 for, 61 against, 74 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6	194 for, 309 against, 145 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 6 — part 5	342 for, 280 against, 30 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 6 — part 4	601 for, 46 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 3 — part 2	490 for, 141 against, 26 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 3 — part 1	406 for, 200 against, 35 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	An EU cardiovascular diseases strategy Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Adopted 545 for, 47 against, 75 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 470 for, 129 against, 62 abstained	Position: For ≠ group	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 6, adding text after recital F	213 for, 426 against, 20 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 64	218 for, 434 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 64	220 for, 432 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 64	175 for, 438 against, 50 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 9 to paragraph 64	205 for, 442 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 8 to paragraph 56	216 for, 439 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 7 to paragraph 35	231 for, 426 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Nuclear decommissioning assistance programme of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania for the period 2028-2034 Final vote	Passed 625 for, 20 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	EU-Norway Agreement on the participation of Norway in GOVSATCOM and in the Union Secure Connectivity Programme Final vote on the draft Council decision	Consent given 612 for, 8 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation 2028-2034 Final vote	Passed 600 for, 21 against, 48 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	EU-Iceland Agreement on the participation of Iceland in GOVSATCOM and in the Union Secure Connectivity Programme Final vote on the draft Council decision	Consent given 631 for, 7 against, 15 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	EU-Switzerland Agreement on the transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime Final vote on the draft Council decision	Consent given 549 for, 75 against, 30 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	EU-UK Agreement regarding cooperation on the application of their respective competition laws Final vote on the draft Council decision	Consent given 640 for, 5 against, 26 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
16 Sept 2026	Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 Final vote	Passed 496 for, 53 against, 125 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 Amendment 86 to Article 9, paragraph 2	131 for, 532 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 Amendment 85, adding text after Article 8	138 for, 532 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026	Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 Amendment 84 to Article 4, after paragraph 1	168 for, 505 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026	Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V) Final vote on the provisional agreement	Passed 530 for, 125 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 16 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2025	2	0
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	41
10 Feb 2025	1	0
11 Feb 2025	32	29
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	30
10 Mar 2025	2	0
11 Mar 2025	9	8
12 Mar 2025	228	206
13 Mar 2025	24	23
31 Mar 2025	3	0
1 Apr 2025	35	34
2 Apr 2025	251	235
3 Apr 2025	62	54
5 May 2025	5	0
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	193
8 May 2025	103	0
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	50
16 Jun 2025	2	0
17 Jun 2025	41	39
18 Jun 2025	91	81
19 Jun 2025	87	0
7 Jul 2025	1	0
8 Jul 2025	55	54
9 Jul 2025	134	115
10 Jul 2025	36	34
8 Sept 2025	1	0
9 Sept 2025	101	96
10 Sept 2025	34	33
11 Sept 2025	69	64
6 Oct 2025	2	0
7 Oct 2025	5	0
8 Oct 2025	55	55
9 Oct 2025	65	65
20 Oct 2025	3	0
21 Oct 2025	13	12
22 Oct 2025	186	178
23 Oct 2025	55	53
13 Nov 2025	267	252
24 Nov 2025	3	0
25 Nov 2025	75	0
26 Nov 2025	100	96
27 Nov 2025	125	125
15 Dec 2025	4	0
16 Dec 2025	66	65
17 Dec 2025	43	43
18 Dec 2025	42	27

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ESN

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Roberto VANNACCI	Roberto VANNACCI changed group	ESN	Italy	75 % of 1 771 shared	80 %
Select Marc JONGEN	Marc JONGEN	ESN	Germany	74 % of 4 318 shared	80 %
Select René AUST	René AUST	ESN	Germany	72 % of 4 495 shared	80 %
Select Volker SCHNURRBUSCH	Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group	ESN	Germany	72 % of 3 499 shared	80 %
Select Anja ARNDT	Anja ARNDT	ESN	Germany	71 % of 4 270 shared	80 %
Select Irmhild BOSSDORF	Irmhild BOSSDORF	ESN	Germany	71 % of 4 685 shared	80 %
Select Stanislav STOYANOV	Stanislav STOYANOV	ESN	Bulgaria	71 % of 4 553 shared	80 %
Select Christine ANDERSON	Christine ANDERSON	ESN	Germany	71 % of 4 589 shared	80 %
Select Petar VOLGIN	Petar VOLGIN	ESN	Bulgaria	70 % of 4 471 shared	80 %
Select Rada LAYKOVA	Rada LAYKOVA	ESN	Bulgaria	70 % of 4 167 shared	80 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Volker SCHNURRBUSCH	Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group	ESN	Germany	92 % of 203 shared	49 %
Select Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK	Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group	Patriots	Poland	70 % of 1 096 shared	70 %
Select Marion MARÉCHAL	Marion MARÉCHAL	ECR	France	66 % of 4 197 shared	64 %
Select Guillaume PELTIER	Guillaume PELTIER	ECR	France	66 % of 4 319 shared	64 %
Select Csaba DÖMÖTÖR	Csaba DÖMÖTÖR	Patriots	Hungary	66 % of 4 437 shared	70 %
Select György HÖLVÉNYI	György HÖLVÉNYI	Patriots	Hungary	65 % of 3 117 shared	70 %
Select András LÁSZLÓ	András LÁSZLÓ	Patriots	Hungary	65 % of 4 121 shared	70 %
Select Antonín STANĚK	Antonín STANĚK	Patriots	Czechia	65 % of 2 877 shared	70 %
Select Viktória FERENC	Viktória FERENC	Patriots	Hungary	65 % of 4 163 shared	70 %
Select Anna BRYŁKA	Anna BRYŁKA changed group	Patriots	Poland	65 % of 4 436 shared	69 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on PetitionsPETI Committee	Member	22 Jan 2025	now
Delegation to the EU-Albania Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-AL Joint parliamentary committee	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with Central AsiaDCAS Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	21 Jan 2025
Committee on PetitionsPETI Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	21 Jan 2025

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Vice-President		6 Feb 2025

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

130 contributions recorded; 7 on behalf of their group; 128 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Sept 2026	Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Sept 2026	The impact of the implementation of the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) on SMEs, its administrative burden and challenges for the European Single Market (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Sept 2026	State of the Union (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Presentation of the Fair Labour Mobility Package (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Presentation of the Fair Labour Mobility Package (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Jul 2026	Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitiveness (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Jul 2026	Evaluation of the common fisheries policy and follow-up (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Jul 2026	Evaluation of the common fisheries policy and follow-up (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Jul 2026	EU’s response and preparedness to protect people against recurring heatwaves and upcoming wildfires (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 15

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
31 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373	Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors	—
17 Jul 2026	Adapting EU energy performance policies in the light of extreme heat episodes O-10-2026-000032	Oral questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
3 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the quality and timeliness of the European Commission’s replies to Members’ written questions B-10-2026-0271	Motion for a resolutionwith 33 co-authors	—
8 Apr 2026	Union Resettlement and Humanitarian Admission Framework Regulation E-10-2026-001410	Written questionwith 25 co-authors	18 Jun 2026
5 Mar 2026	Anti-fascist movements and political violence – the real threat to democracy E-10-2026-000925	Written questionwith 62 co-authors	29 Apr 2026
26 Feb 2026	Inclusion of the Muslim Brotherhood on the EU list of terrorist organisations O-10-2026-000009	Oral questionwith 36 co-authors	Not yet answered
19 Jan 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania B-10-2026-0076	Motion for a resolutionwith 1 co-author	—
8 Dec 2025	Ban on the sale of nitrous oxide to the general public O-10-2025-000046	Oral questionwith 42 co-authors	Not yet answered
2 Dec 2025	Inquiry on politicians on university boards E-10-2025-004762	Written questionwith 20 co-authors	23 Mar 2026
26 Nov 2025	Assessment of Antifa Ost (‘Hammerbande’) as a structured terrorist organisation E-10-2025-004707	Written questionwith 20 co-authors	Not yet answered

Show all 15 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

No committee amendment by this member found this term.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Europe of Sovereign Nations ESN · Far-right · ultranationalism

National delegation

Delegation Lithuania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256808?page=4&period=2025&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Petras GRAŽULIS”. Member record. memberId 256808. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256808?page=4&period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256808. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256808?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-256808,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Petras GRAŽULIS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256808?page=4&period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256808?page=4&period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256808. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256808. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within ESN

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 15

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928