Member

Maria GUZENINA

S&D · Finland

Group: S&D
Country: Finland
Roll-call participation: 99.2 %ⓘ of 261 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.8 % · 2026, final votes
With majority line: 95.8 %ⓘ of 259 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.4 %

More facts (5)

National party: SDP Suomen Sosialidemokraattinen Puolue/Finlands Socialdemokratiska Parti
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 11 of 257 votesⓘ
Committees: CULT (substitute), FEMM (substitute), IMCO
Member id: 256803

National party: SDP Suomen Sosialidemokraattinen Puolue/Finlands Socialdemokratiska Parti
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 11 of 257 votesⓘ
Committees: CULT (substitute), FEMM (substitute), IMCO
Member id: 256803

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

99.2 %

259 of 261 final votes while in office

S&D median: 90.0 % (+9.2 pts)

Chamber median: 90.8 %

With majority line ⓘ

95.8 %

248 of 259 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.4 % (−1.6 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.3 %

11 of 257 votes where their group had a clear line

4 opposite (for ↔ against), 7 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

3.1 %

8 of 259 votes cast

Participation 99.2 % — S&D median 90.0 %, 135 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 135 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Maria GUZENINA	99.2 %
S&D median	90.0 %
Lowest in the group	39.1 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	135

With majority line 95.8 % — S&D median 97.4 %, 135 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 135 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Maria GUZENINA	95.8 %
S&D median	97.4 %
Lowest in the group	84.4 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	135

2026, 261 final votes; 261 of 342 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For ≠ group	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 0 of 26 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	6	6
21 Jan 2026	8	8
22 Jan 2026	8	8
10 Feb 2026	8	8
11 Feb 2026	10	10
12 Feb 2026	8	8
24 Feb 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	9	9
11 Mar 2026	12	12
12 Mar 2026	6	6
26 Mar 2026	13	13
28 Apr 2026	14	14
29 Apr 2026	17	17
30 Apr 2026	11	11
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	11
21 May 2026	10	10
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	15
18 Jun 2026	7	7
7 Jul 2026	15	15
8 Jul 2026	15	15
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	12
16 Sept 2026	16	16
17 Sept 2026	10	10

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Isilda GOMES	Isilda GOMES	S&D	Portugal	96 % of 4 823 shared	93 %
Select Eero HEINÄLUOMA	Eero HEINÄLUOMA	S&D	Finland	96 % of 4 923 shared	93 %
Select Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	S&D	Spain	96 % of 5 055 shared	93 %
Select Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ	Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ	S&D	Lithuania	96 % of 5 140 shared	93 %
Select Sérgio GONÇALVES	Sérgio GONÇALVES	S&D	Portugal	96 % of 5 348 shared	93 %
Select Carla TAVARES	Carla TAVARES	S&D	Portugal	96 % of 5 026 shared	93 %
Select Francisco ASSIS	Francisco ASSIS	S&D	Portugal	96 % of 4 390 shared	93 %
Select Camilla LAURETI	Camilla LAURETI	S&D	Italy	96 % of 5 355 shared	93 %
Select Ana Catarina MENDES	Ana Catarina MENDES	S&D	Portugal	96 % of 4 939 shared	93 %
Select Marta TEMIDO	Marta TEMIDO	S&D	Portugal	96 % of 5 273 shared	93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Renew	Belgium	89 % of 3 905 shared	86 %
Select Ľudovít ÓDOR	Ľudovít ÓDOR	Renew	Slovakia	89 % of 5 128 shared	86 %
Select Marjan ŠAREC	Marjan ŠAREC	Renew	Slovenia	89 % of 5 158 shared	86 %
Select Pascal CANFIN	Pascal CANFIN	Renew	France	89 % of 4 898 shared	86 %
Select Jana TOOM	Jana TOOM	Renew	Estonia	89 % of 4 672 shared	86 %
Select Charles GOERENS	Charles GOERENS	Renew	Luxembourg	89 % of 5 110 shared	86 %
Select Dainius ŽALIMAS	Dainius ŽALIMAS	Renew	Lithuania	89 % of 5 195 shared	86 %
Select Elisabetta GUALMINI	Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group	Renew	Italy	89 % of 1 757 shared	86 %
Select Bernard GUETTA	Bernard GUETTA	Renew	France	89 % of 5 133 shared	86 %
Select Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Renew	Netherlands	88 % of 5 402 shared	86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Culture and EducationCULT Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE Delegation	Substitute	16 Jul 2024	now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working group	Vice-chair	3 Nov 2025	now
Intergroup on Trade UnionsIG10-24 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on the Welfare and Conservation of AnimalsIG10-27 Intergroup / working group	Member	8 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working group	Member	19 Feb 2025	2 Nov 2025

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Official delegation	CULT	15 Jul 2026
European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), the European cybersecurity certification framework, and ICT supply chain security and repealing Regulation (EU) 2019/881 (The Cybersecurity Act 2)	Opinion rapporteur	IMCO	25 Mar 2026
Amending Directive (EU) 2022/2555 as regards simplification measures and alignment with the [Proposal for the Cybersecurity Act 2]	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	IMCO	25 Mar 2026
Amending Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2017/746 as regards simplifying and reducing the burden of the rules on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices, and amending Regulation (EU) 2022/123 as regards the support of the European Medicines Agency for the expert panels on medical devices and Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as regards the list of Union harmonisation legislation referred to in its Annex I	Opinion rapporteur	IMCO	10 Mar 2026
Impact of social media and the online environment on young people	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	FEMM	23 Oct 2025
Impact of social media and the online environment on young people	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	FEMM	2 Oct 2025
Human Rights and Democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	FEMM	22 Sept 2025
Safety of toys and repealing Directive 2009/48/EC	Trilogue negotiator	IMCO	9 Apr 2025
Taking part in the INI report as a shadow rapporteur on the topic of protection of minors online	Shadow rapporteur	CULT	18 Dec 2024
I will be acting as S &D shadow rapporteur on the topic of safety and conformity of products in e-commerce and imports from third countries	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	2 Dec 2024

Show all 10 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

38 contributions recorded; 2 on behalf of their group; 59 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
7 Jul 2026	Presentation of the Action Plan on Cybersecurity and AI (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
18 Jun 2026	International Day of Play: promoting children’s right to play (debate) on behalf of S&D	Speech · 4 min	Read
18 Jun 2026	Joint Declaration on ‘Culture for Europe - Europe for Culture’ (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
19 May 2026	Opportunities and challenges presented by a comprehensive artificial intelligence strategy for EU trade (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Mar 2026	Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	International Day of Education, fighting inequalities in access to education (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Feb 2026	Presentation of the action plan against cyberbullying (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
21 Jan 2026	Online piracy of sports and other live events: urgent need to address unsolved issues (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 Jan 2026	Presentation of the Digital Networks Act (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 38 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 25

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
10 Sept 2026	Sexual exploitation of children in travel and tourism: closing the gaps beyond the EU’s borders E-10-2026-003633	Written questionwith 11 co-authors	Not yet answered
21 Jul 2026	Implementation of the recommendations of the Commission’s Special Panel on children in the digital world E-10-2026-003064	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	11 Sept 2026
15 Jul 2026	Update by the Commission of its guidelines on tackling online disinformation during electoral processes E-10-2026-002950	Written questionwith 31 co-authors	11 Sept 2026
8 Jul 2026	European funds allocated to fighting period poverty E-10-2026-002822	Written questionwith 36 co-authors	Not yet answered
8 Jul 2026	Impact of the recent US Supreme Court ruling on the EU–US Data Privacy Framework and European data sovereignty E-10-2026-002823	Written questionwith 21 co-authors	Not yet answered
18 Jun 2026	Human trafficking and human rights violations through recruitment of non-Russian nationals, in particular from Africa, for Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine E-10-2026-002532	Written questionwith 27 co-authors	6 Aug 2026
15 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0309	Motion for a resolutionwith 10 co-authors	—
10 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recruitment of children by organised crime B-10-2026-0275	Motion for a resolutionwith 33 co-authors	—
6 May 2026	Continuity of tertiary education for pregnant women and women with children E-10-2026-001857	Written questionwith 46 co-authors	3 Jul 2026
27 Apr 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti B-10-2026-0225	Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors	—

Show all 25 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 36

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
8 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2017/746 as regards simplifying and reducing the burden of the rules on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices, and amending Regulation (EU) 2022/123 as regards the support of the European Medicines Agency for the expert panels on medical devices and Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as regards the list of Union harmonisation legislation referred to in its Annex I IMCO-AM-790775	IMCO	1
1 Jul 2026	Amending Directive (EU) 2022/2555 as regards simplification measures and alignment with the [Proposal for the Cybersecurity Act 2] IMCO-AM-790135	IMCO	24
1 Jul 2026	European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), the European cybersecurity certification framework, and ICT supply chain security and repealing Regulation (EU) 2019/881 (The Cybersecurity Act 2) IMCO-AM-790134	IMCO	173
1 Jul 2026	European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), the European cybersecurity certification framework, and ICT supply chain security and repealing Regulation (EU) 2019/881 (The Cybersecurity Act 2) IMCO-AM-790776	IMCO	129
26 Jun 2026	Amending Regulations (EC) No 561/2006, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2019/2144 and (EU) 2024/1257 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the simplification of technical requirements and testing procedures for motor vehicles and repealing Council Directive 70/157/EEC and Regulation No 540/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council CJ76-AM-789933	CJ76	1
26 Jun 2026	Amending Regulations (EC) No 561/2006, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2019/2144 and (EU) 2024/1257 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the simplification of technical requirements and testing procedures for motor vehicles and repealing Council Directive 70/157/EEC and Regulation No 540/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council CJ76-AM-789089	CJ76	1
19 Jun 2026	Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790058	CJ65	6
19 Jun 2026	Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790057	CJ65	6
19 Jun 2026	Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790062	CJ65	9
19 Jun 2026	Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790061	CJ65	14

Show all 36 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats S&D · Centre-left · social democracy

National delegation

Delegation Finland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256803?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Maria GUZENINA”. Member record. memberId 256803. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256803?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256803. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256803?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-256803,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Maria GUZENINA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256803?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256803?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256803. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256803. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within S&D

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 25

Amendments tabled in committee, 36

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928