Skip to content

Member

Petra STEGER

Patriots · Austria

Group
Patriots PfE
Country
Austria
Roll-call participation
95.3 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line
76.8 %ⓘ of 2 749 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 83.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
FPÖ Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
356 of 2 212 votesⓘ
Committees
ITRE (substitute), LIBE, SEDE
Member id
220897
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

95.3 %

2 756 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 93.3 % (+2.0 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

76.8 %

2 110 of 2 749 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 83.1 % (−6.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

16.1 %

356 of 2 212 votes where their group had a clear line

150 opposite (for ↔ against), 168 abstained against the line, 38 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

12.4 %

343 of 2 756 votes cast

Participation 95.3 % — Patriots median 93.3 %, 88 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 88 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Petra STEGER95.3 %
Patriots median93.3 %
Lowest in the group51.8 %
Highest in the group99.9 %
Members88
With majority line 76.8 % — Patriots median 83.1 %, 88 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 88 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Petra STEGER76.8 %
Patriots median83.1 %
Lowest in the group72.7 %
Highest in the group93.8 %
Members88
  • 2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H 181 for, 399 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G 252 for, 326 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3 381 for, 190 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2 338 for, 233 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1 524 for, 48 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E 84 for, 484 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D 193 for, 389 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D 89 for, 494 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C 204 for, 381 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C 215 for, 366 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C 209 for, 378 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C 95 for, 486 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B 345 for, 242 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A 459 for, 120 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5 439 for, 128 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1 392 for, 132 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15 448 for, 137 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2 297 for, 267 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 304 for, 268 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14 92 for, 496 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13 330 for, 250 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 93 for, 493 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 257 for, 331 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2 351 for, 232 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 195 for, 392 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12 390 for, 143 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4 441 for, 147 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3 427 for, 166 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12 231 for, 355 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 261 for, 335 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 259 for, 336 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 208 for, 382 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 235 for, 358 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 277 for, 321 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3 353 for, 240 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2 363 for, 231 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1 390 for, 205 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 203 for, 392 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9 266 for, 295 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8 215 for, 335 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8 261 for, 316 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 395 for, 204 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7 177 for, 418 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7 204 for, 395 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 202 for, 380 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7 253 for, 329 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 91 for, 503 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 261 for, 340 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 7 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Roman HAIDER PatriotsAustria99 % of 5 724 shared74 %
Gerald HAUSER PatriotsAustria99 % of 5 473 shared74 %
Georg MAYER PatriotsAustria99 % of 4 843 shared74 %
Elisabeth DIERINGER PatriotsAustria99 % of 5 707 shared74 %
Harald VILIMSKY PatriotsAustria98 % of 5 532 shared74 %
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group PatriotsPoland78 % of 1 354 shared74 %
Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE PatriotsBelgium76 % of 5 675 shared74 %
Barbara BONTE PatriotsBelgium76 % of 5 636 shared74 %
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PatriotsPoland76 % of 5 059 shared74 %
Gerolf ANNEMANS PatriotsBelgium75 % of 4 938 shared74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
René AUST ESNGermany77 % of 5 256 shared70 %
Marc JONGEN ESNGermany77 % of 5 128 shared70 %
Siegbert Frank DROESE ESNGermany77 % of 5 246 shared70 %
Anja ARNDT ESNGermany77 % of 4 983 shared70 %
Roberto VANNACCI changed group ESNItaly77 % of 2 235 shared68 %
Christine ANDERSON ESNGermany77 % of 5 398 shared70 %
Alexander SELL ESNGermany77 % of 5 277 shared70 %
Markus BUCHHEIT ESNGermany77 % of 5 277 shared70 %
Irmhild BOSSDORF ESNGermany77 % of 5 543 shared70 %
Hans NEUHOFF ESNGermany76 % of 4 357 shared70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeMember30 Apr 2026now
Delegation to the EU-Türkiye Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-TR Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the MediterraneanDMED Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 202529 Apr 2026

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2026Shadow rapporteurSEDE23 Jun 2026
Establishing the Union support for internal security for the period from 2028 to 2034Shadow rapporteurLIBE9 Dec 2025
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurLIBE10 Nov 2025
Amending Regulations (EC) No 1907/2006, (EC) No 1272/2008, (EU) No 528/2012, (EU) 2019/1021 and (EU) 2021/697 as regards defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for defence industryShadow rapporteurSEDE21 Oct 2025

Show all 4 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

48 contributions recorded, 5 written statements; 2 on behalf of their group; 58 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
15 Sept 2026Hybrid attacks against the EU Member States (joint debate) Speech · 2 minRead
15 Sept 2026Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V) - Simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and simplification of security and defence procurement (Omnibus V) - Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V) StatementRead
14 Sept 2026One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
6 Jul 2026One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
19 May 2026EU cybersecurity and preparedness in view of advanced AI systems (debate) StatementRead
18 May 2026One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
28 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
28 Apr 2026Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
28 Apr 2026Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
25 Mar 2026One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 100

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
15 Sept 2026Migrant invasion in Ceuta: much-needed vigilance E-10-2026-003663Written questionwith 7 co-authorsNot yet answered
27 Aug 2026The EU’s deadly anti-racism ideology: the death of Henry Nowak E-10-2026-003350Written questionwith 22 co-authorsNot yet answered
31 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors—
16 Jul 2026Constitutional coup by Péter Magyar’s government E-10-2026-003035Written questionwith 42 co-authors11 Sept 2026
24 Apr 2026Transparency of EU funding for the German-Austrian Digital Media Observatory (GADMO) E-10-2026-001697Written questionwith 5 co-authors4 Aug 2026
23 Mar 2026ProtectEU: stronger security for Europeans or the policing of ideas and democratic dissent? E-10-2026-001208Written questionwith 11 co-authors19 May 2026
19 Mar 2026Use of the ‘borderline content’ handbook promoted at the EU Internet Forum for moderating lawful political speech E-10-2026-001160Written questionwith 31 co-authors19 May 2026
16 Mar 2026Threats to energy security posed by Ukraine’s attacks on the TurkStream gas pipeline E-10-2026-001068Written question12 May 2026
7 Mar 2026Follow-up question to E-001868/2025 – DSA recruitment drive setting the stage for a powerful Brussels censorship machine E-10-2026-000947Written questionwith 1 co-author17 Apr 2026
5 Mar 2026Commission interference: electoral processes inside the EU and political pluralism at risk? E-10-2026-000923Written questionwith 37 co-authors4 May 2026
5 Mar 2026Anti-fascist movements and political violence – the real threat to democracy E-10-2026-000925Written questionwith 62 co-authors29 Apr 2026
3 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on halting the expansion of mosques and Islamic centres in the EU B-10-2026-0154Motion for a resolutionwith 37 co-authors—
25 Feb 2026Follow-up question to E-001070/2025 – Ongoing delays to the introduction of the entry/exit system (EES) E-10-2026-000788Written questionwith 1 co-author29 Apr 2026
10 Feb 2026Hungary’s action before the CJEU against the REPowerEU Regulation due to energy security and sovereignty concerns E-10-2026-000547Written question16 Apr 2026
9 Feb 2026Mass regularisation of undocumented migrants in Spain poses a threat to all of Europe E-10-2026-000522Written questionwith 1 co-author13 Apr 2026
3 Feb 2026National Assembly / Muslim Brotherhood – inclusion on the EU list of terrorist organisations E-10-2026-000421Written questionwith 18 co-authors21 May 2026
26 Jan 2026The Commission’s call for a European army disregards existing treaties and threatens sovereignty and neutrality E-10-2026-000289Written question7 Apr 2026
26 Jan 2026Reporters Without Borders, a biased NGO heavily subsidised by Brussels O-10-2026-000003Oral questionwith 41 co-authorsNot yet answered
14 Jan 2026MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2026-0063Motion for a resolutionwith 109 co-authors—
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0061Motion for a resolutionwith 101 co-authors—
29 Dec 2025Penalties based on the Digital Services Act against the platform X P-10-2025-005077Priority written questionwith 19 co-authors17 Feb 2026
29 Dec 2025Exclusion of the Federation of Catholic Family Associations in Europe from EU funding programmes E-10-2025-005057Written questionwith 22 co-authors16 Mar 2026
19 Dec 2025Multi-million euro fine against X to enforce the EU censorship agenda under the guise of alleged violations of transparency obligations under the DSA O-10-2025-000047Oral questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
15 Dec 2025Corruption scandals in the Office of the President of Ukraine and securing the Ukraine Facility E-10-2025-004956Written questionwith 13 co-authors9 Mar 2026
11 Dec 2025Military Schengen: risk of eroding sovereignty, weakening borders and pushing the EU towards hidden federalism E-10-2025-004916Written questionwith 8 co-authors3 Feb 2026
4 Dec 20252026-2030 LGBTIQ+ Equality Strategy E-10-2025-004821Written questionwith 26 co-authors18 Feb 2026
2 Dec 2025Inclusion of the Muslim Brotherhood in the EU list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts (Council Decision 2001/931/CFSP) E-10-2025-004796Written questionwith 28 co-authors12 Feb 2026
27 Nov 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on banning all application and enforcement of Sharia law in the EU B-10-2025-0553Motion for a resolutionwith 53 co-authors—
26 Nov 2025Assessment of Antifa Ost (‘Hammerbande’) as a structured terrorist organisation E-10-2025-004707Written questionwith 20 co-authorsNot yet answered
25 Nov 2025Plan to set up a European intelligence service under the authority of the President of the Commission E-10-2025-004681Written questionwith 49 co-authorsNot yet answered
24 Nov 2025Fake asylum seekers: the EU is held hostage by a legal interpretation that opens the gates to illegal immigration and the collapse of its borders E-10-2025-004673Written questionwith 31 co-authors6 Feb 2026
20 Nov 2025Manipulation of the Erasmus+ programme as a new channel for immigration and exclusion of Hungarian universities from the programme O-10-2025-000043Oral questionwith 59 co-authorsNot yet answered
19 Nov 2025Protecting citizens’ right to make cash payments and ensuring financial inclusion O-10-2025-000042Oral questionwith 40 co-authorsNot yet answered
14 Nov 2025Discrepancy between statements on migration policy by Commissioner Brunner, responsible for migration, and implementation of the Return Regulation P-10-2025-004552Priority written questionwith 1 co-author27 Jan 2026
31 Oct 2025Returns to Afghanistan: response to Member States’ call for an effective migration policy O-10-2025-000039Oral questionwith 44 co-authorsNot yet answered
28 Oct 2025Surge in drug-related crime in Europe, a scathing indictment of security policy E-10-2025-004227Written questionwith 1 co-author6 Jan 2026
17 Oct 2025Freedom at risk: who controls the forces behind the European Media Freedom Act and who decides what information is monitored within the EU? E-10-2025-004102Written questionwith 22 co-authors16 Dec 2025
16 Oct 2025Wrongful closure of bank accounts on ideological grounds E-10-2025-004082Written questionwith 22 co-authors17 Nov 2025
14 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on declaring Antifa a terrorist organisation B-10-2025-0447Motion for a resolutionwith 79 co-authors—
11 Oct 2025EU Chat Control plans may prompt Signal app to pull out of Europe E-10-2025-003993Written questionwith 1 co-author23 Dec 2025
3 Oct 2025Splitting of the association agreement with Mercosur E-10-2025-003894Written questionwith 13 co-authors1 Dec 2025
30 Sept 2025Accelerated introduction of the digital euro on the public blockchain E-10-2025-003785Written questionwith 1 co-author20 Nov 2025
24 Sept 2025Threats to energy security in central and eastern Europe as a result of Ukrainian sabotage attacks on the Druzhba oil pipeline E-10-2025-003703Written question4 Dec 2025
23 Sept 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the brutal murders of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska and US political activist Charlie Kirk, and the need to defend vulnerable individuals and uphold law and order B-10-2025-0405Motion for a resolutionwith 82 co-authors—
20 Sept 2025Follow-up question to P‑002815/2025 on a possible softening of EU digital rules as part of an agreement with the USA E-10-2025-003643Written questionwith 1 co-author13 Nov 2025
18 Sept 2025Classification of political expressions and satire under the Digital Services Act E-10-2025-003616Written questionwith 39 co-authors18 Nov 2025
17 Sept 2025GPS interference on the flight of Commission President von der Leyen – media disinformation and distorted facts O-10-2025-000030Oral questionwith 36 co-authorsNot yet answered
12 Sept 2025EU funding of non-governmental organisations E-10-2025-003526Written questionwith 35 co-authors21 Nov 2025
12 Sept 2025MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0400Motion for a resolutionwith 84 co-authors—
6 Sept 2025Upholding of arbitration awards based on Sharia law: threats to the rule of law and Europe’s fundamental principles E-10-2025-003464Written questionwith 1 co-author6 Oct 2025
4 Sept 2025Mandatory introduction of ill-conceived vehicle systems under the General Product Safety Regulation E-10-2025-003423Written question16 Oct 2025
2 Sept 2025ECJ ruling on the classification of safe countries of origin out of touch with reality E-10-2025-003359Written questionwith 1 co-author6 Nov 2025
1 Sept 2025European Court of Auditors special report 11/2025 on Transparency of EU funding granted to NGOs E-10-2025-003339Written questionwith 57 co-authors25 Nov 2025
29 Aug 2025Follow-up to E-001535/2025 – Future role and funding of the EU Rapid Deployment Capacity E-10-2025-003335Written question7 Nov 2025
27 Aug 2025US government lobbying campaign to eliminate the Digital Services Act as a censorship tool E-10-2025-003303Written questionwith 1 co-author14 Oct 2025
24 Aug 2025Magnus Brunner, Commissioner for Home Affairs and Migration, issued with an embarrassing entry ban in Libya, a country receiving well over EUR 700 million in EU funding E-10-2025-003277Written questionwith 1 co-author10 Nov 2025
22 Aug 2025The collapse of the asylum system in Crete highlights the failure of EU external border protection and the overloading of national reception capacities E-10-2025-003276Written questionwith 1 co-author7 Oct 2025
6 Aug 2025Chinese laser attack on German reconnaissance aircraft taking part in EU-led ASPIDES operation E-10-2025-003186Written question30 Sept 2025
29 Jul 2025Suspension of family reunification for beneficiaries of subsidiary protection in Germany E-10-2025-003123Written questionwith 1 co-author26 Sept 2025
28 Jul 2025Transparency and quality of Commission’s replies to MEPs’ written questions E-10-2025-003117Written questionwith 17 co-authors7 Oct 2025
16 Jul 2025NATO pro-war propaganda menacing Europe’s security and sowing panic among people E-10-2025-002925Written question29 Aug 2025
11 Jul 2025Budapest Pride Parade as a pretext for a ‘moralist Commission’ to overstep its powers and disregard national child protection laws for ideologically motivated reasons E-10-2025-002845Written questionwith 1 co-author25 Sept 2025
10 Jul 2025Possible softening of EU digital rules as part of an agreement with the USA P-10-2025-002815Priority written questionwith 1 co-author18 Aug 2025
30 Jun 2025Zelenskyy’s propagandistic alert over alleged imminent Russian military operations in Europe E-10-2025-002623Written question13 Aug 2025
24 Jun 202540th anniversary of Schengen – a failed promise of security E-10-2025-002528Written questionwith 1 co-author1 Aug 2025
20 Jun 2025EU institutions’ participation in Vienna Pride 2025 E-10-2025-002489Written question27 Aug 2025
13 Jun 2025Censorship attempts by France in the run-up to the Romanian presidential elections E-10-2025-002390Written questionwith 1 co-author4 Aug 2025
11 Jun 2025Family reunification from countries where polygamy is practiced E-10-2025-002343Written questionwith 1 co-author12 Sept 2025
30 May 2025EU support for an art initiative endorsing mass migration E-10-2025-002177Written questionwith 1 co-author20 Oct 2025
27 May 2025German security service classifying AfD as ‘right-wing extremist’ in violation of EU fundamental rights E-10-2025-002110Written questionwith 1 co-author15 Jul 2025
27 May 2025Influence of left-wing organisations on the list of safe countries of origin E-10-2025-002121Written questionwith 1 co-author17 Jul 2025
12 May 2025Can the Commission guarantee that citizens’ deposits will stay untouched under the Savings and Investments Union during emergencies such as nearby conflicts or new pandemics? E-10-2025-001893Written questionwith 12 co-authors30 Jun 2025
8 May 2025DSA recruitment drive setting the stage for a powerful Brussels censorship machine E-10-2025-001868Written questionwith 1 co-author27 Jun 2025
7 May 2025Frontloading elements of the EU asylum and migration package on the basis of a completely inadequate EU list of safe countries of origin E-10-2025-001852Written questionwith 1 co-author25 Jun 2025
23 Apr 2025Anti-white racism and Christianophobia: the forgotten victims of the EU’s strategy against racism E-10-2025-001643Written questionwith 14 co-authors25 Jun 2025
17 Apr 2025Application of the rule of law conditionality mechanism – Institutional balance and respect for national competences E-10-2025-001578Written questionwith 18 co-authors2 Jul 2025
15 Apr 2025Future role and funding of the EU Rapid Deployment Capacity E-10-2025-001535Written question11 Jun 2025
14 Apr 2025Suspension of family reunification in Austria P-10-2025-001525Priority written question17 Jul 2025
9 Apr 2025Authoritarian restructuring of the Turkish state without consequences for EU candidate status E-10-2025-001451Written question27 Jun 2025
8 Apr 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on a joint and strong response to the Federal Republic of Germany’s departure from financial stability B-10-2025-0241Motion for a resolutionwith 20 co-authors—
1 Apr 2025Commission’s response to the impact of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) on the competitiveness of EU businesses E-10-2025-001325Written questionwith 19 co-authors13 May 2025
27 Mar 2025Questionable European intelligence service reports on an impending Russian attack on the EU as a pretext for debt-financed arms build-up programmes E-10-2025-001291Written question24 Jun 2025
25 Mar 2025Holidays back home for Syrian asylum seekers E-10-2025-001240Written question18 Jul 2025
19 Mar 2025Transformation of the EU – from peace project to war economy E-10-2025-001164Written question2 Jun 2025
18 Mar 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on political repression and fundamental rights in Bulgaria B-10-2025-0198Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors—
14 Mar 2025Commission meddling in the Romanian presidential election E-10-2025-001112Written question3 Jun 2025
12 Mar 2025Ongoing delays to the introduction of the entry/exit system (EES) E-10-2025-001070Written question23 Jun 2025
11 Mar 2025Erdoğan – a danger to Europe rather than the saviour of its security E-10-2025-001035Written question19 Jun 2025
3 Mar 2025Lifting of EU sanctions against Syria and repatriation of Syrian asylum seekers E-10-2025-000888Written question28 May 2025
28 Feb 2025Commission President von der Leyen after three years of war in Ukraine – a proven troublemaker and failed dealmaker E-10-2025-000882Written question25 Apr 2025
27 Feb 2025Proposals by former Commissioner for Economy Paolo Gentiloni on a debt-financed EU Defence Fund and ending the veto on new Eurobonds E-10-2025-000874Written question6 May 2025
26 Feb 2025Exclusion of Modul University Vienna from the Erasmus+ programme E-10-2025-000866Written question23 Apr 2025
24 Feb 2025European Court of Justice ruling on asylum applications by Afghan women E-10-2025-000827Written question18 Jul 2025
11 Feb 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on implementing a mass return strategy to expel illegal migrants B-10-2025-0137Motion for a resolutionwith 36 co-authors—
10 Feb 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on safeguarding the right to freedom of speech online B-10-2025-0099Motion for a resolutionwith 17 co-authors—
6 Feb 2025Exacerbation of industrial relocation driven by EU policy through US tariffs P-10-2025-000555Priority written question28 Mar 2025
5 Feb 2025Niinistö Report: cost, contract award and transparency E-10-2025-000545Written question27 Jun 2025
5 Feb 2025Draghi Report: cost, contract award and transparency E-10-2025-000544Written question25 Jun 2025
10 Oct 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on enabling Member States to opt-out of EU migration policy B-10-2024-0119Motion for a resolutionwith 56 co-authors—
16 Jul 2024Impunity for X in exchange for quiet censorship E-10-2024-001367Written question21 Oct 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 19

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
24 Jun 2026Establishing the Union support for internal security for the period from 2028 to 2034 LIBE-AM-790119 LIBE20
18 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2019/631 as regards CO2 emission performance standards for new light duty vehicles and vehicle labelling and repealing Directive 1999/94/EC ITRE-AM-790043 ITRE23
17 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2019/631 as regards CO2 emission performance standards for new light duty vehicles and vehicle labelling and repealing Directive 1999/94/EC ITRE-AM-789960 ITRE37
15 Dec 2025The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report – annual report 2025 LIBE-AM-781446 LIBE60
10 Dec 2025Amending Directives 2014/65/EU and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the extension of certain mitigating measures available for small and medium sized enterprises to small mid-cap enterprises and further simplifying measures CJ12-AM-781388 CJ128
17 Nov 2025Public access to documents – report covering the years 2022 - 2024 LIBE-AM-779637 LIBE12
12 Nov 2025Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 LIBE-AM-779631 LIBE6
6 Nov 2025Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 as regards the application of the ‘safe third country’ concept LIBE-AM-779510 LIBE11
29 Oct 2025Amending Regulations (EC) No 1907/2006, (EC) No 1272/2008, (EU) No 528/2012, (EU) 2019/1021 and (EU) 2021/697 as regards defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for defence industry CJ61-AM-779431 CJ611
29 Oct 2025Amending Regulations (EC) No 1907/2006, (EC) No 1272/2008, (EU) No 528/2012, (EU) 2019/1021 and (EU) 2021/697 as regards defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for defence industry CJ61-AM-778402 CJ613

Show all 19 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Austria National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Petra STEGER”. Member record. memberId 220897. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/220897?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/220897. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/220897?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-220897,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Petra STEGER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/220897?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/220897?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 220897. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/220897. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}