Member

Nora MEBAREK

S&D · France

Group: S&D
Country: France
Roll-call participation: 92.7 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line: 93.6 %ⓘ of 2 678 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 96.5 %

More facts (5)

National party: PS Parti socialiste
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 160 of 2 652 votesⓘ
Committees: EMPL (substitute), REGI (vice-chair)
Member id: 204418

National party: PS Parti socialiste
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 160 of 2 652 votesⓘ
Committees: EMPL (substitute), REGI (vice-chair)
Member id: 204418

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

92.7 %

2 680 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

S&D median: 90.0 % (+2.7 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

93.6 %

2 506 of 2 678 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 96.5 % (−2.9 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

6.0 %

160 of 2 652 votes where their group had a clear line

106 opposite (for ↔ against), 43 abstained against the line, 11 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

3.2 %

86 of 2 680 votes cast

Participation 92.7 % — S&D median 90.0 %, 136 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 136 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Nora MEBAREK	92.7 %
S&D median	90.0 %
Lowest in the group	54.5 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	136

With majority line 93.6 % — S&D median 96.5 %, 136 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 136 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Nora MEBAREK	93.6 %
S&D median	96.5 %
Lowest in the group	80.8 %
Highest in the group	99.5 %
Members	136

2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 4 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	44
10 Feb 2025	1	1
11 Feb 2025	32	32
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	30
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	226
13 Mar 2025	24	24
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	204
3 Apr 2025	62	57
5 May 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	10	9
7 May 2025	220	200
8 May 2025	103	86
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	53
16 Jun 2025	2	0
17 Jun 2025	41	40
18 Jun 2025	91	90
19 Jun 2025	87	84
7 Jul 2025	1	0
8 Jul 2025	55	52
9 Jul 2025	134	134
10 Jul 2025	36	31
8 Sept 2025	1	1
9 Sept 2025	101	99
10 Sept 2025	34	33
11 Sept 2025	69	64
6 Oct 2025	2	2
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	52
9 Oct 2025	65	61
20 Oct 2025	3	3
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	184
23 Oct 2025	55	53
13 Nov 2025	267	266
24 Nov 2025	3	0
25 Nov 2025	75	74
26 Nov 2025	100	82
27 Nov 2025	125	118
15 Dec 2025	4	4
16 Dec 2025	66	57
17 Dec 2025	43	41
18 Dec 2025	42	0

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	S&D	France	99 % of 4 820 shared	93 %
Select Emma RAFOWICZ	Emma RAFOWICZ	S&D	France	98 % of 3 843 shared	93 %
Select Murielle LAURENT	Murielle LAURENT	S&D	France	98 % of 5 018 shared	93 %
Select Eric SARGIACOMO	Eric SARGIACOMO	S&D	France	98 % of 5 054 shared	93 %
Select Christophe CLERGEAU	Christophe CLERGEAU	S&D	France	98 % of 4 612 shared	93 %
Select Aurore LALUCQ	Aurore LALUCQ	S&D	France	98 % of 4 352 shared	93 %
Select Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN	Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN	S&D	France	98 % of 5 249 shared	93 %
Select Claire FITA	Claire FITA	S&D	France	98 % of 4 219 shared	93 %
Select Pierre JOUVET	Pierre JOUVET	S&D	France	98 % of 4 698 shared	93 %
Select Chloé RIDEL	Chloé RIDEL	S&D	France	97 % of 3 536 shared	93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Catarina VIEIRA	Catarina VIEIRA	Greens	Netherlands	87 % of 4 899 shared	83 %
Select Terry REINTKE	Terry REINTKE	Greens	Germany	87 % of 4 906 shared	83 %
Select Maria OHISALO	Maria OHISALO	Greens	Finland	87 % of 4 498 shared	83 %
Select Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Greens	Netherlands	87 % of 4 963 shared	83 %
Select Bas EICKHOUT	Bas EICKHOUT Former member	Greens	Netherlands	87 % of 4 231 shared	83 %
Select Jutta PAULUS	Jutta PAULUS	Greens	Germany	87 % of 4 845 shared	83 %
Select Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Renew	Belgium	86 % of 3 917 shared	86 %
Select Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ	Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ	Greens	Romania	86 % of 3 201 shared	83 %
Select Sara MATTHIEU	Sara MATTHIEU	Greens	Belgium	86 % of 4 639 shared	83 %
Select Erik MARQUARDT	Erik MARQUARDT	Greens	Germany	86 % of 5 084 shared	83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI Committee	Vice-chair	23 Jul 2024	now
Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European UnionHOUS Special committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countriesDMAS Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the MediterraneanDMED Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group	Member	16 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Seas, Rivers, Islands and Coastal Areas (SEARICA)IG10-20 Intergroup / working group	Member	4 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on Sky and SpaceIG10-21 Intergroup / working group	Member	27 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on the Social Economy and Services of General InterestIG10-23 Intergroup / working group	Member	30 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Trade UnionsIG10-24 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now

Show all 12 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Strengthening cohesion policy for the EU’s islands and coastal regions	Shadow rapporteur	REGI	15 Sept 2026
Establishing the European Social Fund as part of the National and Regional Partnership Plan set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRPPlan] establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to quality employment, skills and social inclusion for the period from 2028 to 2034	Opinion rapporteur	REGI	16 Jan 2026
Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/888	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	EMPL	18 Dec 2025
Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	EMPL	18 Dec 2025
Amending Directive 2004/37/EC as regards the addition of substances and setting limit values in its Annexes I, III and IIIa	Shadow rapporteur	EMPL	21 Oct 2025
Rapport d'initiative intitulé \"\"le rôle de la politique de cohésion dans le soutien à la transition juste\"\"	Shadow rapporteur	REGI	13 Dec 2024
No dossier named	Committee vice-chair	REGI	19 Jul 2024

Show all 7 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

8 contributions recorded; 4 on behalf of their group; 12 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Dec 2025	Presentation of the European Affordable Housing Plan (continuation of debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Dec 2025	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci - urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking (debate) on behalf of S&D	Speech · 2 min	Read
9 Sept 2025	Cohesion policy (joint debate) on behalf of S&D	Speech · 2 min	Read
16 Jun 2025	Strengthening rural areas in the EU through cohesion policy (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2025	Supporting the EU’s most vulnerable regions against devastating effects of climate change, such as the recent cyclone hitting La Réunion (debate) on behalf of S&D	Speech · 2 min	Read
17 Dec 2024	The situation in Mayotte following the devastating cyclone Chido and the need for solidarity (debate) on behalf of S&D	Speech · 1 min	Read
23 Oct 2024	The important role of cities and regions in the EU – for a green, social and prosperous local development (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
9 Oct 2024	Ensuring sustainable, decent and affordable housing in Europe - encouraging investment, private property and public housing programmes (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 8 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 30

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
2 Sept 2026	Protecting workers from extreme heatwaves E-10-2026-003456	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	Not yet answered
15 Jul 2026	Update by the Commission of its guidelines on tackling online disinformation during electoral processes E-10-2026-002950	Written questionwith 31 co-authors	11 Sept 2026
14 Jul 2026	Preserving EU capacities to produce paper pulp and cellulose fibres – state of affairs at Fibre Excellence P-10-2026-002901	Priority written questionwith 12 co-authors	12 Aug 2026
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
30 Jun 2026	Follow-up to question for written answer E-001083/2025 on menstrual products: transparency and health risks E-10-2026-002698	Written questionwith 43 co-authors	18 Sept 2026
17 Jun 2026	Request that the Commission publish evidence pertaining to the non-activation of the Blocking Statute E-10-2026-002520	Written questionwith 31 co-authors	Not yet answered
16 Jun 2026	Promoting ‘freedom to stay’ for the completion of the single market for a more resilient Europe and a locally anchored industrial policy E-10-2026-002476	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	4 Sept 2026
10 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recruitment of children by organised crime B-10-2026-0275	Motion for a resolutionwith 33 co-authors	—
13 May 2026	Implementation of EU law on methane emissions and air quality in France P-10-2026-001980	Priority written question	12 Jun 2026
23 Apr 2026	Risks hanging over the European steel industry and use of public funding by ArcelorMittal E-10-2026-001682	Written questionwith 12 co-authors	8 Jun 2026
20 Mar 2026	Transfer of European citizens’ biometric data to the Trump administration O-10-2026-000015	Oral questionwith 48 co-authors	Not yet answered
2 Feb 2026	Suspension of the EU-Qatar aviation agreement E-10-2026-000413	Written questionwith 14 co-authors	16 Apr 2026
14 Jan 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the murder of Mehdi Kessaci: urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking B-10-2026-0057	Motion for a resolutionwith 4 co-authors	—
14 Jan 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0060	Motion for a resolutionwith 143 co-authors	—
20 Nov 2025	Support for cross-border night trains in Europe P-10-2025-004634	Priority written questionwith 15 co-authors	9 Mar 2026
19 Nov 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on protection of EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materials B-10-2025-0500	Motion for a resolutionwith 71 co-authors	—
19 Sept 2025	Suspension of the EU-Qatar agreement on air transport O-10-2025-000031	Oral questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
16 Sept 2025	Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive and the effective implementation of the Polluter Pays principle E-10-2025-003552	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	11 Nov 2025
15 Sept 2025	Situation of the silicon industry in Europe and in France P-10-2025-003550	Priority written questionwith 12 co-authors	13 Nov 2025
2 Jul 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation of 10 June 2025 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 to add Algeria, Angola, Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, Laos, Lebanon, Monaco, Namibia, Nepal and Venezuela to the list of high-risk third countries which have provided a written high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies and have developed an action plan with the FATF, and to remove Barbados, Gibraltar, Jamaica, Panama, the Philippines, Senegal, Uganda and the United Arab Emirates from that list B-10-2025-0315	Motion for a resolutionwith 28 co-authors	—
27 Jun 2025	New studies confirming carcinogenic effects of long-term exposure to glyphosate at relevant levels E-10-2025-002611	Written questionwith 31 co-authors	Not yet answered
26 Jun 2025	Reported environmental and human rights abuses of EU steel companies in non-EU countries and the need to uphold the CSDDD’s objective E-10-2025-002596	Written questionwith 26 co-authors	11 Aug 2025
19 Jun 2025	Children experiencing informal homelessness E-10-2025-002481	Written questionwith 4 co-authors	14 Aug 2025
2 Jun 2025	Access for humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip E-10-2025-002193	Written questionwith 21 co-authors	4 Aug 2025
13 Mar 2025	Welcoming US scientists and researchers to Europe after Trump administration budget cuts E-10-2025-001093	Written questionwith 11 co-authors	15 May 2025
12 Feb 2025	The Commission’s recent statement on the 28th regime and labour law E-10-2025-000673	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	11 Jun 2025
11 Feb 2025	Trump declarations on Gaza and the Palestinian people E-10-2025-000612	Written questionwith 55 co-authors	3 Apr 2025
3 Feb 2025	Obstacle to competition in France’s outlying territories: upholding EU law in the face of the high cost of living P-10-2025-000461	Priority written questionwith 19 co-authors	31 Mar 2025
26 Nov 2024	Social dumping in cross-Channel transport services E-10-2024-002659	Written question	23 Jan 2025
17 Oct 2024	Implementation of the ICJ advisory opinion as regards EU trade with illegal Israeli settlements E-10-2024-002150	Written questionwith 29 co-authors	15 Jan 2025

Amendments tabled in committee, 71

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – ‘EU Inc.’ JURI-AM-791129	JURI	1
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791128	JURI	4
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790093	CJ71	4
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790101	CJ71	3
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790103	CJ71	2
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790094	CJ71	2
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790155	CJ71	2
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790090	CJ71	1
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790092	CJ71	1
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790100	CJ71	10

Show all 71 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats S&D · Centre-left · social democracy

National delegation

Delegation France National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204418?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Nora MEBAREK”. Member record. memberId 204418. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204418?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/204418. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/204418?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-204418,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Nora MEBAREK}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204418?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204418?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 204418. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/204418. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within S&D

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 30

Amendments tabled in committee, 71

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928