Member

Maria OHISALO

Greens · Finland

Group: Greens Verts/ALE
Country: Finland
Roll-call participation: 70.7 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line: 99.4 %ⓘ of 2 045 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 97.2 %

More facts (5)

National party: VIHR Vihreä liitto
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 3 of 2 005 votesⓘ
Committees: ECON (substitute), EMPL, ENVI (substitute)
Member id: 198076

National party: VIHR Vihreä liitto
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 3 of 2 005 votesⓘ
Committees: ECON (substitute), EMPL, ENVI (substitute)
Member id: 198076

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

70.7 %

2 045 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

Greens median: 95.1 % (−24.4 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

99.4 %

2 032 of 2 045 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 97.2 % (+2.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.1 %

3 of 2 005 votes where their group had a clear line

2 opposite (for ↔ against), 1 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

3.9 %

80 of 2 045 votes cast

Participation 70.7 % — Greens median 95.1 %, 53 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 53 members of the Greens with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Maria OHISALO	70.7 %
Greens median	95.1 %
Lowest in the group	62.5 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	53

With majority line 99.4 % — Greens median 97.2 %, 53 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 53 members of the Greens with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Maria OHISALO	99.4 %
Greens median	97.2 %
Lowest in the group	88.0 %
Highest in the group	99.6 %
Members	53

2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 5	343 for, 247 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 5	338 for, 261 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5	201 for, 390 against, 14 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5	280 for, 292 against, 26 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 64 to paragraph 5	200 for, 397 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 4	437 for, 82 against, 82 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 4	231 for, 350 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4	272 for, 256 against, 77 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 4	124 for, 428 against, 50 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 23 to paragraph 4	427 for, 156 against, 24 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 63 to paragraph 4	267 for, 332 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 3	194 for, 399 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3	136 for, 423 against, 46 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 62 to paragraph 3	92 for, 488 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2	203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 2 — part 2	524 for, 75 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 2 — part 1	596 for, 8 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1	427 for, 149 against, 29 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 1	111 for, 439 against, 51 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 1 — part 2	435 for, 127 against, 47 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 601 for, 4 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 5, adding text after recital H	200 for, 406 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 13 to recital C — part 2	344 for, 201 against, 63 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 13 to recital C — part 1	378 for, 202 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 4, adding text after recital B	195 for, 403 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 22	186 for, 408 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 5	207 for, 397 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Paragraph 5 — part 2	512 for, 86 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Paragraph 5 — part 1	602 for, 8 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2	210 for, 396 against, 1 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 1	210 for, 395 against, 1 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 2	347 for, 202 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 1	381 for, 202 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1	181 for, 424 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1	196 for, 411 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 2	344 for, 256 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 1	213 for, 394 against, 1 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 368 for, 172 against, 69 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 1, adding text after recital G	141 for, 462 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 22	452 for, 119 against, 39 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 20	480 for, 116 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 3	582 for, 10 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 2	275 for, 270 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 1	490 for, 120 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 12	475 for, 121 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 4	478 for, 126 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 3	489 for, 116 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 2	479 for, 124 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 4 — part 3	474 for, 126 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 4 — part 2	499 for, 95 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 18 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	45
10 Feb 2025	1	1
11 Feb 2025	32	32
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	30
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	226
13 Mar 2025	24	24
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	250
3 Apr 2025	62	61
5 May 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	220
8 May 2025	103	103
21 May 2025	2	0
22 May 2025	53	0
16 Jun 2025	2	0
17 Jun 2025	41	0
18 Jun 2025	91	0
19 Jun 2025	87	0
7 Jul 2025	1	0
8 Jul 2025	55	0
9 Jul 2025	134	0
10 Jul 2025	36	0
8 Sept 2025	1	0
9 Sept 2025	101	0
10 Sept 2025	34	0
11 Sept 2025	69	0
6 Oct 2025	2	0
7 Oct 2025	5	0
8 Oct 2025	55	0
9 Oct 2025	65	0
20 Oct 2025	3	2
21 Oct 2025	13	12
22 Oct 2025	186	185
23 Oct 2025	55	52
13 Nov 2025	267	267
24 Nov 2025	3	3
25 Nov 2025	75	75
26 Nov 2025	100	99
27 Nov 2025	125	124
15 Dec 2025	4	4
16 Dec 2025	66	66
17 Dec 2025	43	43
18 Dec 2025	42	42

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Ville NIINISTÖ	Ville NIINISTÖ	Greens	Finland	99 % of 3 609 shared	94 %
Select Sara MATTHIEU	Sara MATTHIEU	Greens	Belgium	99 % of 4 330 shared	94 %
Select Terry REINTKE	Terry REINTKE	Greens	Germany	99 % of 4 639 shared	94 %
Select Bas EICKHOUT	Bas EICKHOUT Former member	Greens	Netherlands	99 % of 3 918 shared	94 %
Select Anna CAVAZZINI	Anna CAVAZZINI	Greens	Germany	98 % of 5 014 shared	94 %
Select Erik MARQUARDT	Erik MARQUARDT	Greens	Germany	98 % of 4 769 shared	94 %
Select Daniel FREUND	Daniel FREUND	Greens	Germany	98 % of 5 021 shared	94 %
Select Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Greens	Germany	98 % of 4 698 shared	94 %
Select Hannah NEUMANN	Hannah NEUMANN	Greens	Germany	98 % of 4 595 shared	94 %
Select Alexandra GEESE	Alexandra GEESE	Greens	Germany	98 % of 4 464 shared	94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Aurore LALUCQ	Aurore LALUCQ	S&D	France	88 % of 3 970 shared	83 %
Select Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	S&D	France	88 % of 4 629 shared	83 %
Select Mohammed CHAHIM	Mohammed CHAHIM	S&D	Netherlands	87 % of 4 361 shared	83 %
Select Emma RAFOWICZ	Emma RAFOWICZ	S&D	France	87 % of 3 582 shared	83 %
Select Udo BULLMANN	Udo BULLMANN	S&D	Germany	87 % of 4 534 shared	83 %
Select Murielle LAURENT	Murielle LAURENT	S&D	France	87 % of 4 648 shared	83 %
Select Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN	Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN	S&D	France	87 % of 4 905 shared	83 %
Select Eric SARGIACOMO	Eric SARGIACOMO	S&D	France	87 % of 4 720 shared	83 %
Select Thijs REUTEN	Thijs REUTEN	S&D	Netherlands	87 % of 4 920 shared	83 %
Select Marit MAIJ	Marit MAIJ	S&D	Netherlands	87 % of 5 048 shared	83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI Committee	Substitute	20 Jan 2025	now
Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European UnionHOUS Special committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation for relations with JapanD-JP Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group	Member	16 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working group	Member	19 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on DisabilityIG10-10 Intergroup / working group	Member	11 Mar 2025	now
Intergroup on Fighting against PovertyIG10-12 Intergroup / working group	Member	24 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Mental HealthIG10-17 Intergroup / working group	Member	5 Feb 2025	now

Show all 13 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Finland – EGF/2026/003 FI/Valmet Automotive	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	EMPL	4 Sept 2026
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Spain – EGF/2026/002 ES/Galicia automotive ancillary	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	EMPL	4 Sept 2026
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Belgium – EGF/2026/001 BE/Cora	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	EMPL	4 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	ECON	1 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Rapporteur	EMPL	26 Aug 2026
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States	Shadow rapporteur	EMPL	16 Jul 2026
I worked as a shadow rapporteur on the special HOUS committee which has now finalised its report. I will participate to the HOUS mission in Helsinki.	Official delegation		8 Jul 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	EMPL	11 Jun 2026
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Belgium – EGF/2025/009 BE/Soliver	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	EMPL	13 May 2026
Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2026 High-Level Political Forum	Shadow rapporteur	ENVI	16 Mar 2026

Show all 47 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

36 contributions recorded; 11 on behalf of their group; 44 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
17 Sept 2026	An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 2 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Devastating heatwaves, wildfires and droughts in Europe: lessons from summer 2026 (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Jul 2026	EU’s response and preparedness to protect people against recurring heatwaves and upcoming wildfires (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Jul 2026	EU’s response and preparedness to protect people against recurring heatwaves and upcoming wildfires (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
18 Jun 2026	Joint Declaration on ‘Culture for Europe - Europe for Culture’ (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
18 Jun 2026	Joint Declaration on ‘Culture for Europe - Europe for Culture’ (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
16 Jun 2026	Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 May 2026	European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Stop destroying videogames’ (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 May 2026	European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Stop destroying videogames’ (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 May 2026	Recent proposals to fight poverty in the EU (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 36 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 148

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro, B-10-2026-0400	Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0398	Motion for a resolutionwith 4 co-authors	—
8 Sept 2026	Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539	Written questionwith 67 co-authors	Not yet answered
7 Sept 2026	Climate change, public health and the world of work: for a directive on maximum working temperatures O-10-2026-000035	Oral questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
1 Sept 2026	Baiting of aquatic birds in the vicinity of Natura 2000 areas E-10-2026-003431	Written question	Not yet answered
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Threat of War Crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian Law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0358	Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors	—
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
29 Jun 2026	Scrutiny of hunting trophy imports into the EU E-10-2026-002689	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	25 Aug 2026
17 Jun 2026	Systematic sexualised torture against Palestinian detainees E-10-2026-002515	Written questionwith 23 co-authors	12 Aug 2026
16 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0324	Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors	—

Show all 148 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 44

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
2 Sept 2026	Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States EMPL-AM-792013	EMPL	17
13 Jul 2026	General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections EMPL-AM-789962	EMPL	10
12 May 2026	Establishing the European Social Fund as part of the National and Regional Partnership Plan set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRPPlan] establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to quality employment, skills and social inclusion for the period from 2028 to 2034 EMPL-AM-788860	EMPL	16
27 Apr 2026	Amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 ITRE-AM-787752	ITRE	1
21 Apr 2026	Psychosocial risks, stress and mental health at work EMPL-AM-787743	EMPL	27
21 Apr 2026	Psychosocial risks, stress and mental health at work EMPL-AM-787726	EMPL	15
25 Mar 2026	Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2026 High-Level Political Forum CJ37-AM-786769	CJ37	4
25 Mar 2026	Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2026 High-Level Political Forum CJ37-AM-785443	CJ37	19
24 Mar 2026	Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 EMPL-AM-786760	EMPL	49
24 Mar 2026	Digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial system ECON-AM-786707	ECON	31

Show all 44 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Greens / European Free Alliance Greens · Centre-left · green politics, regionalism

National delegation

Delegation Finland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/198076?page=2&period=2025&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Maria OHISALO”. Member record. memberId 198076. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/198076?page=2&period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/198076. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/198076?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-198076,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Maria OHISALO}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/198076?page=2&period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/198076?page=2&period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 198076. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/198076. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Greens

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 148

Amendments tabled in committee, 44

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928