Member

Kim VAN SPARRENTAK

Greens · Netherlands

Group: Greens Verts/ALE
Country: Netherlands
Roll-call participation: 98.0 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line: 97.9 %ⓘ of 2 834 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 97.2 %

More facts (5)

National party: PRO Progressief Nederland
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 40 of 2 772 votesⓘ
Committees: EMPL (substitute), IMCO
Member id: 197870

National party: PRO Progressief Nederland
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 40 of 2 772 votesⓘ
Committees: EMPL (substitute), IMCO
Member id: 197870

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

98.0 %

2 834 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

Greens median: 95.1 % (+2.9 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.9 %

2 775 of 2 834 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 97.2 % (+0.7 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.4 %

40 of 2 772 votes where their group had a clear line

17 opposite (for ↔ against), 14 abstained against the line, 9 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

3.9 %

110 of 2 834 votes cast

Participation 98.0 % — Greens median 95.1 %, 53 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 53 members of the Greens with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	98.0 %
Greens median	95.1 %
Lowest in the group	62.5 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	53

With majority line 97.9 % — Greens median 97.2 %, 53 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 53 members of the Greens with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	97.9 %
Greens median	97.2 %
Lowest in the group	88.0 %
Highest in the group	99.6 %
Members	53

2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	45
10 Feb 2025	1	1
11 Feb 2025	32	32
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	29
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	225
13 Mar 2025	24	24
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	251
3 Apr 2025	62	59
5 May 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	220
8 May 2025	103	103
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	52
16 Jun 2025	2	1
17 Jun 2025	41	41
18 Jun 2025	91	90
19 Jun 2025	87	86
7 Jul 2025	1	1
8 Jul 2025	55	55
9 Jul 2025	134	134
10 Jul 2025	36	35
8 Sept 2025	1	1
9 Sept 2025	101	101
10 Sept 2025	34	34
11 Sept 2025	69	68
6 Oct 2025	2	2
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	55
9 Oct 2025	65	65
20 Oct 2025	3	3
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	185
23 Oct 2025	55	55
13 Nov 2025	267	267
24 Nov 2025	3	3
25 Nov 2025	75	75
26 Nov 2025	100	100
27 Nov 2025	125	125
15 Dec 2025	4	4
16 Dec 2025	66	65
17 Dec 2025	43	43
18 Dec 2025	42	0

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Catarina VIEIRA	Catarina VIEIRA	Greens	Netherlands	100 % of 5 035 shared	94 %
Select Tineke STRIK	Tineke STRIK	Greens	Netherlands	99 % of 5 218 shared	94 %
Select Bas EICKHOUT	Bas EICKHOUT Former member	Greens	Netherlands	98 % of 4 687 shared	94 %
Select Terry REINTKE	Terry REINTKE	Greens	Germany	98 % of 5 059 shared	94 %
Select Maria OHISALO	Maria OHISALO	Greens	Finland	97 % of 4 631 shared	94 %
Select Sara MATTHIEU	Sara MATTHIEU	Greens	Belgium	97 % of 4 742 shared	94 %
Select Ville NIINISTÖ	Ville NIINISTÖ	Greens	Finland	97 % of 4 089 shared	94 %
Select Erik MARQUARDT	Erik MARQUARDT	Greens	Germany	97 % of 5 217 shared	94 %
Select Anna CAVAZZINI	Anna CAVAZZINI	Greens	Germany	97 % of 5 420 shared	94 %
Select Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Greens	Germany	97 % of 4 972 shared	94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Mohammed CHAHIM	Mohammed CHAHIM	S&D	Netherlands	89 % of 4 754 shared	83 %
Select Thijs REUTEN	Thijs REUTEN	S&D	Netherlands	89 % of 5 326 shared	83 %
Select Marit MAIJ	Marit MAIJ	S&D	Netherlands	89 % of 5 459 shared	83 %
Select Aurore LALUCQ	Aurore LALUCQ	S&D	France	89 % of 4 396 shared	83 %
Select Lara WOLTERS	Lara WOLTERS	S&D	Netherlands	89 % of 4 962 shared	83 %
Select Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	S&D	France	88 % of 4 858 shared	83 %
Select Udo BULLMANN	Udo BULLMANN	S&D	Germany	88 % of 4 595 shared	83 %
Select Katarina BARLEY	Katarina BARLEY	S&D	Germany	88 % of 4 158 shared	83 %
Select Emma RAFOWICZ	Emma RAFOWICZ	S&D	France	88 % of 3 797 shared	83 %
Select Murielle LAURENT	Murielle LAURENT	S&D	France	87 % of 4 993 shared	83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation for relations with the Pan-African ParliamentDPAP Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDAFR Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group	Member	16 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Anti-Racism and DiversityIG10-02 Intergroup / working group	Member	14 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working group	Member	19 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working group	Chair co	31 Jan 2025	now

Show all 11 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.'	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	EMPL	8 Jun 2026
Amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	29 Jan 2026
Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield	Shadow rapporteur	EUDS	27 Jan 2026
Registration documents for vehicles and vehicle registration data recorded in national vehicle registers	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	IMCO	10 Nov 2025
Establishing the Union Customs Code and the European Union Customs Authority, and repealing Regulation (EU) No 952/2013	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	8 Jul 2025
Electric vehicle supply equipment, compressed gas dispensers, and electricity, gas and thermal energy meters	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	12 May 2025
Public interface connected to the Internal Market Information System for the declaration of posting of workers and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	24 Apr 2025
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	EUDS	17 Mar 2025
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	EMPL	25 Feb 2025
A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world – 2024/2051(INI) – IMCO/10/01078	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	30 Jan 2025

Show all 16 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

39 contributions recorded; 14 on behalf of their group; 54 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	State of the Union (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Protecting children’s safety and mental health from the risks posed by social media – our duty to act now (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Jun 2026	Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 May 2026	EU cybersecurity and preparedness in view of advanced AI systems (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
18 May 2026	Order of business	Speech · 1 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Mar 2026	European Citizens’ Initiative 'Ban on conversion practices in the European Union' (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	International Women’s Day	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	Single Market: how to move from an incomplete single market to one market for one Europe (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 2 min	Read

Show all 39 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 69

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
13 Sept 2026	Repeated ban on Oradea Pride and compliance with fundamental rights in the use of EU funds E-10-2026-003648	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	Not yet answered
8 Sept 2026	Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539	Written questionwith 67 co-authors	Not yet answered
7 Sept 2026	Extraterritorial impact of the US designation of Autistici/Inventati as a terrorist entity P-10-2026-003526	Priority written questionwith 28 co-authors	Not yet answered
14 Jul 2026	State of play of negotiations on the agreement on the exchange of personal data between Europol and Israel E-10-2026-002925	Written questionwith 24 co-authors	1 Sept 2026
8 Jul 2026	European funds allocated to fighting period poverty E-10-2026-002822	Written questionwith 36 co-authors	Not yet answered
8 Jul 2026	Impact of the recent US Supreme Court ruling on the EU–US Data Privacy Framework and European data sovereignty E-10-2026-002823	Written questionwith 21 co-authors	Not yet answered
30 Jun 2026	Follow-up to question for written answer E-001083/2025 on menstrual products: transparency and health risks E-10-2026-002698	Written questionwith 43 co-authors	18 Sept 2026
11 Jun 2026	Appointment of Jim Hagemann Snabe as Special Envoy for Industrial Artificial Intelligence E-10-2026-002410	Written questionwith 10 co-authors	18 Sept 2026
9 Jun 2026	Sovereignty of European payment system Wero P-10-2026-002371	Priority written questionwith 9 co-authors	18 Sept 2026
19 May 2026	Use of Hungarian public funds for organised activities concerning transnational political influence in the EU democratic space E-10-2026-002058	Written questionwith 12 co-authors	1 Sept 2026
22 Apr 2026	Asbestos in children’s toys and the functioning of Safety Gate E-10-2026-001661	Written questionwith 1 co-author	15 Jun 2026
21 Apr 2026	Customs practices related to products imported from illegal Israeli settlements in the OPTs E-10-2026-001633	Written questionwith 71 co-authors	16 Jul 2026
17 Apr 2026	Taxation of windfall profits in the energy sector O-10-2026-000019	Oral questionwith 53 co-authors	Not yet answered
16 Apr 2026	Commission’s assessment of Hungary’s announced withdrawal from the ICC Rome Statute E-10-2026-001577	Written questionwith 14 co-authors	27 Jul 2026
16 Apr 2026	Claude Mythos and the cybersecurity risks facing the EU E-10-2026-001575	Written questionwith 10 co-authors	19 Jun 2026
8 Apr 2026	EU response to Knesset legislation on death penalty E-10-2026-001406	Written questionwith 24 co-authors	8 Jun 2026
31 Mar 2026	Dynamic pricing, competition concerns and consumer protection in FIFA World Cup 2026 ticket sales E-10-2026-001336	Written questionwith 22 co-authors	9 Jun 2026
30 Mar 2026	Deeply concerning events in Hungary E-10-2026-001318	Written questionwith 15 co-authors	5 Jun 2026
9 Mar 2026	Public procurement and deaths at work: choosing the best bidder in social terms and making social rights and safety at work a condition for access to contracts O-10-2026-000011	Oral questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
3 Mar 2026	Protection of EU officials and civil society against risks of privacy violations and foreign sanctions in relation to the implementation of the Digital Services Act E-10-2026-000880	Written questionwith 23 co-authors	20 May 2026
19 Feb 2026	The European Parliament’s call to trigger the blocking statute to protect and safeguard the International Criminal Court E-10-2026-000718	Written questionwith 54 co-authors	13 May 2026
4 Feb 2026	Mayor of Budapest fined and charged without trial for organising a Pride march in the EU E-10-2026-000446	Written questionwith 81 co-authors	10 Apr 2026
22 Jan 2026	AI companion chatbots: protecting minors under EU law E-10-2026-000256	Written questionwith 27 co-authors	18 Mar 2026
20 Jan 2026	Ban AI-powered nudity and undressing applications from the EU market E-10-2026-000202	Written questionwith 52 co-authors	9 Mar 2026
14 Jan 2026	Big Tech lobby attack on the EU’s transparency and targeting of political advertising rules E-10-2026-000158	Written questionwith 24 co-authors	27 Mar 2026
13 Jan 2026	Request for urgent EU measures against AI-enabled non-consensual sexualised content involving minors on platform X E-10-2026-000099	Written questionwith 21 co-authors	9 Mar 2026
7 Jan 2026	Consequences for Hungary’s non-compliance with the Court of Justice of the European Union asylum judgement E-10-2026-000032	Written questionwith 18 co-authors	31 Mar 2026
17 Dec 2025	Compliance of Booking Holdings with the Digital Markets Act E-10-2025-004981	Written questionwith 9 co-authors	23 Feb 2026
15 Dec 2025	Extraterritorial sanctions leading to ‘debanking’ of EU citizens and officials of EU-supported institutions E-10-2025-004941	Written questionwith 35 co-authors	18 Feb 2026
4 Dec 2025	Designation of OpenAI’s ChatGPT under the Digital Services Act E-10-2025-004826	Written questionwith 4 co-authors	2 Feb 2026
2 Dec 2025	European Democracy Shield – very large online platform algorithms, foreign interference and the spread of disinformation O-10-2025-000044	Oral questionwith 46 co-authors	Not yet answered
19 Nov 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on protection of EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materials B-10-2025-0500	Motion for a resolutionwith 71 co-authors	—
12 Nov 2025	Child-like sex dolls for sale: major e-commerce platforms failing to comply with EU law E-10-2025-004488	Written questionwith 47 co-authors	5 Jan 2026
5 Nov 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Agreement on Digital Trade between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore B-10-2025-0479	Motion for a resolutionwith 75 co-authors	—
13 Oct 2025	Follow-up: protection of Hungarian citizens against biometric surveillance: follow-up of question for written answer E-002415/2025 E-10-2025-004013	Written questionwith 41 co-authors	5 Mar 2026
7 Oct 2025	US TikTok deal and the ‘MAGA algorithm’ E-10-2025-003925	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	1 Dec 2025
6 Oct 2025	Online retail and unfair advantages E-10-2025-003905	Written questionwith 16 co-authors	1 Dec 2025
2 Sept 2025	Prohibited predatory marketing of illicit vapes to children on Snapchat and severe medical harm to children caused by vapes E-10-2025-003366	Written questionwith 1 co-author	20 Oct 2025
4 Aug 2025	Strengthening the role of local and regional authorities in upholding the rule of law in the EU E-10-2025-003175	Written questionwith 27 co-authors	2 Oct 2025
23 Jul 2025	Update of guidelines to combat greenwashing in accordance with Directive (EU) 2024/825 E-10-2025-003053	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	4 Sept 2025
16 Jul 2025	Concerns over Israeli online campaigns and enforcement of DSA obligations E-10-2025-002936	Written questionwith 31 co-authors	12 Sept 2025
9 Jul 2025	Ensuring public transparency in the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice E-10-2025-002796	Written questionwith 4 co-authors	20 Aug 2025
4 Jul 2025	The abuse of state advertising for political influence and enforcement of the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) E-10-2025-002736	Written questionwith 23 co-authors	28 Aug 2025
30 Jun 2025	Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act in the context of EU-US trade negotiations P-10-2025-002647	Priority written questionwith 24 co-authors	29 Jul 2025
16 Jun 2025	Protection of Hungarian citizens’ fundamental rights in the context of biometric identification and surveillance at public gatherings E-10-2025-002415	Written questionwith 59 co-authors	1 Aug 2025
6 Jun 2025	US decision to suspend student visas and social media screening E-10-2025-002295	Written questionwith 45 co-authors	12 Aug 2025
23 Apr 2025	Acquisition of X by Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence start-up xAI E-10-2025-001615	Written questionwith 42 co-authors	14 Jul 2025
7 Apr 2025	Taxation of big digital tech companies E-10-2025-001409	Written questionwith 38 co-authors	17 Jul 2025
1 Apr 2025	Withdrawal of the Horizontal Anti-Discrimination Directive P-10-2025-001330	Priority written questionwith 40 co-authors	21 May 2025
25 Mar 2025	Draft 15th amendment to the Hungarian Constitution E-10-2025-001233	Written questionwith 32 co-authors	23 Jul 2025
18 Mar 2025	Withdrawal of the proposed horizontal anti-discrimination directive P-10-2025-001148	Priority written questionwith 46 co-authors	24 Jul 2025
25 Feb 2025	Countering Russian influence and defending democracy in Georgia E-10-2025-000837	Written questionwith 38 co-authors	3 Apr 2025
19 Feb 2025	EU action and leadership on global health in view of the US withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) P-10-2025-000773	Priority written questionwith 33 co-authors	14 May 2025
5 Feb 2025	EU-US data transfers following Trump’s election E-10-2025-000520	Written questionwith 18 co-authors	Not yet answered
4 Feb 2025	US AI chip export restrictions: a challenge to EU unity and technological sovereignty E-10-2025-000483	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	8 Apr 2025
28 Jan 2025	Meta’s discriminatory terms and conditions against the LGBTQIA+ community under the Digital Services Act E-10-2025-000384	Written questionwith 34 co-authors	28 Mar 2025
17 Jan 2025	Actual or foreseeable negative effects of Elon Musk’s statements on civic discourse, electoral processes and freedom and pluralism of the media under the DSA E-10-2025-000191	Written questionwith 47 co-authors	5 Mar 2025
11 Dec 2024	Big Tech’s non-compliance with European internet rules: DSA Audit Reports E-10-2024-002858	Written question	14 Feb 2025
9 Dec 2024	The spread of disinformation by recommender systems and other automated mechanisms as a systemic risk under the Digital Services Act E-10-2024-002826	Written questionwith 39 co-authors	19 Feb 2025
5 Dec 2024	The first General-Purpose Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) Code of Practice: Appointment of Chairs and Vice-Chairs E-10-2024-002787	Written questionwith 2 co-authors	8 Apr 2025
5 Dec 2024	The role of TikTok in the Romanian presidential election E-10-2024-002794	Written questionwith 36 co-authors	11 Feb 2025
4 Dec 2024	Applicability of the Digital Services Act to platforms such as Telegram E-10-2024-002762	Written question	17 Feb 2025
21 Nov 2024	Change of algorithm on X before US election P-10-2024-002623	Priority written questionwith 41 co-authors	12 Feb 2025
6 Nov 2024	Lay-off of TikTok’s entire content moderation team in the Netherlands and the DSA E-10-2024-002454	Written question	7 Jan 2025
6 Nov 2024	Clarification of Article 5 of the Artificial Intelligence Act regarding the deployment of remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces E-10-2024-002452	Written questionwith 16 co-authors	26 Feb 2025
22 Oct 2024	Endorsement of two anti-UNRWA bills by the Israeli Knesset E-10-2024-002205	Written questionwith 42 co-authors	19 Dec 2024
1 Oct 2024	Georgia’s newly adopted anti-LGBTIQ+ law E-10-2024-001891	Written questionwith 16 co-authors	12 Feb 2025
16 Sept 2024	Italian Government’s moves against ‘gender ideology’ and respect for EU fundamental rights E-10-2024-001724	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	13 Jan 2025
29 Jul 2024	Need for a united and decisive legislative response to tackle homophobia in Europe E-10-2024-001446	Written questionwith 9 co-authors	10 Oct 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 21

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
22 Jun 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' EMPL-AM-790022	EMPL	42
14 Feb 2026	Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) CJ40-AM-784275	CJ40	21
14 Feb 2026	Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) CJ40-AM-784309	CJ40	5
14 Feb 2026	Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) CJ40-AM-784274	CJ40	13
12 Feb 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784406	EUDS	15
12 Feb 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784367	EUDS	29
12 Feb 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784405	EUDS	15
12 Feb 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784407	EUDS	30
12 Feb 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784408	EUDS	21
12 Feb 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784433	EUDS	18

Show all 21 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Greens / European Free Alliance Greens · Centre-left · green politics, regionalism

National delegation

Delegation Netherlands National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197870?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Kim VAN SPARRENTAK”. Member record. memberId 197870. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197870?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197870. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197870?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-197870,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Kim VAN SPARRENTAK}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197870?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197870?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197870. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197870. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Greens

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 69

Amendments tabled in committee, 21

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928