Member

Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA

Patriots · Spain

Group: Patriots PfE
Country: Spain
Roll-call participation: 94.9 %ⓘ of 293 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.5 % · 2025, final votes
With majority line: 73.7 %ⓘ of 278 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 81.0 %

More facts (5)

National party: VOX
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 45 of 222 votesⓘ
Committees: ENVI, LIBE, SEDE (substitute)
Member id: 197829

National party: VOX
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 45 of 222 votesⓘ
Committees: ENVI, LIBE, SEDE (substitute)
Member id: 197829

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

94.9 %

278 of 293 final votes while in office

Patriots median: 92.7 % (+2.1 pts)

Chamber median: 91.5 %

With majority line ⓘ

73.7 %

205 of 278 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 81.0 % (−7.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

20.3 %

45 of 222 votes where their group had a clear line

22 opposite (for ↔ against), 20 abstained against the line, 3 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

20.1 %

56 of 278 votes cast

Participation 94.9 % — Patriots median 92.7 %, 88 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 88 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA	94.9 %
Patriots median	92.7 %
Lowest in the group	47.1 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	88

With majority line 73.7 % — Patriots median 81.0 %, 87 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 87 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA	73.7 %
Patriots median	81.0 %
Lowest in the group	59.8 %
Highest in the group	94.2 %
Members	87

2025, 293 final votes; 293 of 371 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 3 of 38 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	1	1
23 Jan 2025	4	4
11 Feb 2025	4	4
12 Feb 2025	4	4
13 Feb 2025	2	0
11 Mar 2025	4	4
12 Mar 2025	7	7
13 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	7	7
2 Apr 2025	9	9
3 Apr 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	4	4
7 May 2025	20	20
8 May 2025	12	11
22 May 2025	6	0
17 Jun 2025	8	8
18 Jun 2025	7	7
19 Jun 2025	6	6
8 Jul 2025	8	8
9 Jul 2025	14	14
10 Jul 2025	7	7
9 Sept 2025	6	6
10 Sept 2025	15	15
11 Sept 2025	8	8
7 Oct 2025	4	4
8 Oct 2025	10	10
9 Oct 2025	10	9
21 Oct 2025	8	8
22 Oct 2025	6	6
23 Oct 2025	5	0
13 Nov 2025	16	16
25 Nov 2025	13	13
26 Nov 2025	10	10
27 Nov 2025	11	11
16 Dec 2025	11	11
17 Dec 2025	11	11
18 Dec 2025	6	6

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN	Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN	Patriots	Spain	100 % of 5 602 shared	74 %
Select Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL	Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL	Patriots	Spain	99 % of 5 128 shared	74 %
Select Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN	Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN	Patriots	Spain	99 % of 5 319 shared	74 %
Select Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS	Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS	Patriots	Spain	99 % of 4 286 shared	74 %
Select Hermann TERTSCH	Hermann TERTSCH	Patriots	Spain	97 % of 4 196 shared	74 %
Select Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ	Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ	Patriots	Portugal	83 % of 5 372 shared	74 %
Select Anna BRYŁKA	Anna BRYŁKA changed group	Patriots	Poland	81 % of 4 963 shared	74 %
Select Vilis KRIŠTOPANS	Vilis KRIŠTOPANS	Patriots	Latvia	81 % of 5 150 shared	74 %
Select Tomasz BUCZEK	Tomasz BUCZEK changed group	Patriots	Poland	81 % of 5 123 shared	74 %
Select António TÂNGER CORRÊA	António TÂNGER CORRÊA	Patriots	Portugal	80 % of 4 743 shared	74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Guillaume PELTIER	Guillaume PELTIER	ECR	France	80 % of 4 858 shared	68 %
Select Laurence TROCHU	Laurence TROCHU	ECR	France	80 % of 5 404 shared	68 %
Select Marion MARÉCHAL	Marion MARÉCHAL	ECR	France	79 % of 4 800 shared	68 %
Select Nicolas BAY	Nicolas BAY	ECR	France	79 % of 5 064 shared	68 %
Select Sarah KNAFO	Sarah KNAFO	ESN	France	77 % of 4 226 shared	70 %
Select Stephen Nikola BARTULICA	Stephen Nikola BARTULICA	ECR	Croatia	76 % of 4 695 shared	68 %
Select Jaak MADISON	Jaak MADISON	ECR	Estonia	76 % of 4 775 shared	68 %
Select Roberto VANNACCI	Roberto VANNACCI changed group	ESN	Italy	76 % of 2 168 shared	68 %
Select Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI	Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI	ECR	Poland	75 % of 4 874 shared	68 %
Select Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	ECR	Poland	75 % of 5 077 shared	68 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI Committee	Member	20 Jan 2025	now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE Committee	Substitute	23 Jan 2025	now
Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European UnionHOUS Special committee	Substitute	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union, including the EU-Morocco, EU-Tunisia and EU-Algeria Joint Parliamentary CommitteesDMAG Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the MediterraneanDMED Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Biodiversity, Hunting and CountrysideIG10-04 Intergroup / working group	Member	4 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on Christians in the Middle EastIG10-07 Intergroup / working group	Member	20 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on Sustainable LivestockIG10-15 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food SafetyENVI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	19 Jan 2025

Show all 11 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
EU Emissions Trading System: heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026–2030	Shadow rapporteur	ENVI	15 Sept 2026
Conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in respect of Gibraltar between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	LIBE	15 Sept 2026
EU Emissions Trading System: heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026–2030	Shadow rapporteur	ENVI	10 Sept 2026
Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund	Shadow rapporteur	ENVI	16 Mar 2026
Establishing the Union support for asylum, migration and integration for the period from 2028 to 2034	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	6 Feb 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	LIBE	13 Jan 2026
the 2023 Implementation report on the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement	Shadow rapporteur	ENVI	12 Feb 2025
Protection of groundwater against pollution and environmental quality standards in the field of water policy (2022/0344(COD))	Shadow rapporteur	ENVI	29 Nov 2024
Commission's 2024 Rule of Law report	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	LIBE	14 Nov 2024
INI on a revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	LIBE	30 Oct 2024

Show all 12 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

94 contributions recorded; 17 on behalf of their group; 135 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
15 Sept 2026	Hybrid attacks against the EU Member States (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Hybrid attacks against the EU Member States (joint debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders (debate) on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 2 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025 (A10-0170/2026 - Joachim Streit) (vote)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Urgent measures to strengthen the competitiveness and safeguard quality jobs in the EU’s automotive sector (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
6 Jul 2026	Order of business	Speech · 1 min	Read
18 Jun 2026	Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Jun 2026	Time for European economic independence (debate)	Speech	Read
15 Jun 2026	Time for European economic independence (debate)	Speech	Read
15 Jun 2026	Time for European economic independence (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 125

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
15 Sept 2026	Migrant invasion in Ceuta: much-needed vigilance E-10-2026-003663	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	Not yet answered
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders B-10-2026-0408	Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors	—
3 Sept 2026	Immediate termination of funding to Morocco E-10-2026-003483	Written question	Not yet answered
3 Sept 2026	Report by Spanish police demonstrating involvement of Moroccan security forces in the attack in Ceuta P-10-2026-003478	Priority written question	Not yet answered
31 Aug 2026	Radical NGO distributes weapons to illegal immigrants E-10-2026-003386	Written question	Not yet answered
26 Aug 2026	Spanish Government plans to transfer illegal immigrants to the mainland P-10-2026-003344	Priority written questionwith 5 co-authors	Not yet answered
31 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373	Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors	—
29 Jul 2026	Temporary VAT exemptions for those affected by forest fires E-10-2026-003165	Written question	Not yet answered
16 Jul 2026	Constitutional coup by Péter Magyar’s government E-10-2026-003035	Written questionwith 42 co-authors	11 Sept 2026
15 Jul 2026	Spain’s ‘Grandchildren’s law’ and breach of European Union law P-10-2026-002930	Priority written question	27 Aug 2026

Show all 125 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 103

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – ‘EU Inc.’ JURI-AM-791129	JURI	10
22 Jul 2026	Amending Decision (EU) 2015/1814 as regards ceasing the invalidation of allowances in the market stability reserve ENVI-AM-791122	ENVI	3
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791128	JURI	3
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791130	JURI	25
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791131	JURI	30
10 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2019/631 as regards CO2 emission performance standards for new light duty vehicles and vehicle labelling and repealing Directive 1999/94/EC ENVI-AM-789913	ENVI	10
29 Jun 2026	UN Climate Change Conference 2026 in Antalya, Turkey (COP31) ENVI-AM-790214	ENVI	5
29 Jun 2026	UN Climate Change Conference 2026 in Antalya, Turkey (COP31) ENVI-AM-790213	ENVI	6
24 Jun 2026	Establishing the Union support for asylum, migration and integration for the period from 2028 to 2034 LIBE-AM-790146	LIBE	16
24 Jun 2026	Establishing the Union support for asylum, migration and integration for the period from 2028 to 2034 LIBE-AM-790113	LIBE	8

Show all 103 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Patriots for Europe Patriots · Far-right · national conservatism, right-wing populism

National delegation

Delegation Spain National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197829?period=2025&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA”. Member record. memberId 197829. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197829?period=2025&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197829. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197829?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-197829,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197829?period=2025&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197829?period=2025&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197829. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197829. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Patriots

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 125

Amendments tabled in committee, 103

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928