Member

Bart GROOTHUIS

Renew · Netherlands

Group: Renew
Country: Netherlands
Roll-call participation: 65.5 %ⓘ of 2 521 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.9 % · 2026, roll calls
With majority line: 90.4 %ⓘ of 1 650 votes where the group had a line · Renew median 95.1 %

More facts (5)

National party: VVD Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democratie
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 125 of 1 596 votesⓘ
Committees: INTA, ITRE, SEDE (substitute)
Member id: 197780

National party: VVD Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democratie
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 125 of 1 596 votesⓘ
Committees: INTA, ITRE, SEDE (substitute)
Member id: 197780

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

65.5 %

1 650 of 2 521 roll calls while in office

Renew median: 91.7 % (−26.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.9 %

With majority line ⓘ

90.4 %

1 491 of 1 650 votes where their group had a line

Renew median: 95.1 % (−4.7 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

7.8 %

125 of 1 596 votes where their group had a clear line

114 opposite (for ↔ against), 10 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

0.7 %

11 of 1 650 votes cast

Participation 65.5 % — Renew median 91.7 %, 77 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 77 members of the Renew with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Bart GROOTHUIS	65.5 %
Renew median	91.7 %
Lowest in the group	25.2 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	77

With majority line 90.4 % — Renew median 95.1 %, 77 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 77 members of the Renew with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Bart GROOTHUIS	90.4 %
Renew median	95.1 %
Lowest in the group	77.5 %
Highest in the group	98.6 %
Members	77

2026, 2 521 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Renew; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For ≠ group	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For ≠ group	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For ≠ group	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For ≠ group	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 5 of 34 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	67	60
21 Jan 2026	112	92
22 Jan 2026	58	33
9 Feb 2026	2	2
10 Feb 2026	38	34
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	117
24 Feb 2026	43	0
9 Mar 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	197	186
11 Mar 2026	60	49
12 Mar 2026	34	28
25 Mar 2026	3	3
26 Mar 2026	69	67
27 Apr 2026	2	0
28 Apr 2026	225	0
29 Apr 2026	296	0
30 Apr 2026	68	0
18 May 2026	4	3
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	86
21 May 2026	98	82
15 Jun 2026	2	2
16 Jun 2026	40	36
17 Jun 2026	127	114
18 Jun 2026	77	48
6 Jul 2026	2	2
7 Jul 2026	72	69
8 Jul 2026	144	130
9 Jul 2026	67	61
14 Sept 2026	1	1
15 Sept 2026	155	137
16 Sept 2026	80	72
17 Sept 2026	124	119

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Renew

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Jeannette BALJEU	Jeannette BALJEU	Renew	Netherlands	99 % of 4 351 shared	92 %
Select Anouk VAN BRUG	Anouk VAN BRUG	Renew	Netherlands	99 % of 3 231 shared	92 %
Select Malik AZMANI	Malik AZMANI	Renew	Netherlands	99 % of 4 412 shared	92 %
Select Taner KABILOV	Taner KABILOV changed group	ECR	Bulgaria	93 % of 333 shared	92 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	92 % of 3 858 shared	92 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	92 % of 3 604 shared	92 %
Select Elsi KATAINEN	Elsi KATAINEN	Renew	Finland	92 % of 4 358 shared	92 %
Select Andreas GLÜCK	Andreas GLÜCK	Renew	Germany	91 % of 3 121 shared	92 %
Select Karin KARLSBRO	Karin KARLSBRO	Renew	Sweden	91 % of 4 383 shared	92 %
Select Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE	Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE Former member	Renew	France	91 % of 1 870 shared	92 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Willemien KONING	Willemien KONING	EPP	Netherlands	88 % of 1 176 shared	82 %
Select Tom BERENDSEN	Tom BERENDSEN Former member	EPP	Netherlands	88 % of 3 098 shared	82 %
Select Sven SIMON	Sven SIMON	EPP	Germany	88 % of 3 691 shared	82 %
Select Christine SCHNEIDER	Christine SCHNEIDER Former member	EPP	Germany	88 % of 2 910 shared	82 %
Select Jeroen LENAERS	Jeroen LENAERS	EPP	Netherlands	88 % of 4 450 shared	82 %
Select Pekka TOVERI	Pekka TOVERI	EPP	Finland	88 % of 3 940 shared	82 %
Select Ingeborg TER LAAK	Ingeborg TER LAAK	EPP	Netherlands	88 % of 4 426 shared	82 %
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	88 % of 3 470 shared	82 %
Select Lena DÜPONT	Lena DÜPONT	EPP	Germany	88 % of 3 593 shared	82 %
Select Daniel CASPARY	Daniel CASPARY Former member	EPP	Germany	88 % of 2 747 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on International TradeINTA Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE Committee	Substitute	23 Jan 2025	now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation for relations with IranD-IR Delegation	Vice-chair	3 Oct 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Freedom of Religion, Belief and ConscienceIG10-13 Intergroup / working group	Member	27 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Sky and SpaceIG10-21 Intergroup / working group	Member	27 Feb 2025	now
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	8 Jul 2026

Show all 12 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Chips Act 2.0	Shadow rapporteur	ITRE	9 Sept 2026
European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), the European cybersecurity certification framework, and ICT supply chain security and repealing Regulation (EU) 2019/881 (The Cybersecurity Act 2)	Shadow rapporteur	ITRE	9 Sept 2026
Establishing a framework of measures for the acceleration of industrial capacity and decarbonisation in strategic sectors and amending Regulations (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2024/1735 and (EU) 2024/3110	Shadow rapporteur	INTA	20 May 2026
Role of trade in strengthening the EU's economic security	Shadow rapporteur	INTA	7 May 2026
European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), the European cybersecurity certification framework, and ICT supply chain security and repealing Regulation (EU) 2019/881 (The Cybersecurity Act 2)	Shadow rapporteur	ITRE	25 Feb 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	ITRE	21 Jan 2026
The screening of foreign investments in the Union and repealing Regulation (EU) 2019/452 of the European Parliament and of the Council	Shadow rapporteur	INTA	16 Oct 2025
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	17 Feb 2025
AFET/SEDE Draft report on Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024 - 2024/XXXX(INI)	Shadow rapporteur	SEDE	15 Oct 2024
No dossier named	Delegation vice-chair	D-IR	1 Oct 2024

Show all 11 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

30 contributions recorded; 7 on behalf of their group; 36 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
15 Sept 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Presentation of the Action Plan on Cybersecurity and AI (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Presentation of the Action Plan on Cybersecurity and AI (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Presentation of the Action Plan on Cybersecurity and AI (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Jun 2026	Achieving digital sovereignty and resilience for Europe, in light of recent developments affecting access to advanced AI technologies (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Jun 2026	Achieving digital sovereignty and resilience for Europe, in light of recent developments affecting access to advanced AI technologies (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 May 2026	EU cybersecurity and preparedness in view of advanced AI systems (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Mar 2026	EUCO and situation in the Middle East (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Feb 2026	European response to the attacks on the Ukrainian energy system causing a humanitarian crisis (debate)	Speech	Read
10 Feb 2026	European response to the attacks on the Ukrainian energy system causing a humanitarian crisis (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 30 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 33

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
8 Sept 2026	Russian-made speed cameras with undocumented remote access procured in the EU P-10-2026-003538	Priority written question	Not yet answered
2 Jul 2026	EU financing instruments for the deployment of fusion energy infrastructure E-10-2026-002744	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	18 Sept 2026
29 Jun 2026	Evasion of European sanctions through Türkiye in the case of machinery produced in Member States for the Russian military supply chain E-10-2026-002679	Written questionwith 9 co-authors	21 Aug 2026
24 Jun 2026	Russian satellites causing interference with GPS signals across Europe P-10-2026-002590	Priority written question	17 Aug 2026
11 Jun 2026	Small modular reactors E-10-2026-002408	Written questionwith 25 co-authors	20 Aug 2026
20 May 2026	Circumvention of EU sanctions against Russia in the aviation sector E-10-2026-002080	Written questionwith 1 co-author	16 Jul 2026
18 May 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran B-10-2026-0262	Motion for a resolutionwith 16 co-authors	—
25 Mar 2026	Ensuring competition and strategic autonomy in the AI gigafactory supply chain E-10-2026-001255	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	19 Jun 2026
20 Mar 2026	Maritime war risk insurance and European energy security P-10-2026-001180	Priority written question	24 Apr 2026
19 Mar 2026	EU rules on rail competition and the procurement of rolling stock for military mobility E-10-2026-001153	Written question	16 Jun 2026
13 Mar 2026	Persistent imports of Russian aluminium and other strategic commodities into the EU E-10-2026-001061	Written questionwith 6 co-authors	29 Apr 2026
19 Jan 2026	European funding for universities that terminate cooperation with Israeli counterparts E-10-2026-000187	Written questionwith 18 co-authors	27 Mar 2026
19 Jan 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the brutal repression against protesters in Iran B-10-2026-0080	Motion for a resolutionwith 13 co-authors	—
24 Nov 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the escalating repression of Baha’is in Iran B-10-2025-0541	Motion for a resolutionwith 13 co-authors	—
12 Nov 2025	European reserve fleet for repairing subsea power cables E-10-2025-004479	Written question	15 Jan 2026
9 Sept 2025	Countering shadow fleets through the FATF E-10-2025-003491	Written question	13 Nov 2025
3 Sept 2025	Russian cryptocurrency bypasses EU sanctions to move capital across borders and to fund political influence campaigns abroad E-10-2025-003377	Written questionwith 4 co-authors	28 Oct 2025
7 Jul 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions B-10-2025-0330	Motion for a resolutionwith 11 co-authors	—
30 Jun 2025	Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act in the context of EU-US trade negotiations P-10-2025-002647	Priority written questionwith 24 co-authors	29 Jul 2025
16 Jun 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The case of Dr. Ahmadreza Djalali’s illegal arrest and detention in Iran B-10-2025-0285	Motion for a resolutionwith 16 co-authors	—
26 May 2025	Concerns about Chinese hacks of Deutsche Telekom and potential implications for the Commission’s IT infrastructure E-10-2025-002101	Written question	6 Aug 2025
21 May 2025	EU’s military fuel infrastructure E-10-2025-002024	Written question	8 Aug 2025
21 May 2025	Reliability concerns in the Galileo global navigation satellite system E-10-2025-002019	Written question	6 Aug 2025
15 May 2025	Toolbox to restrict risky photovoltaic (PV) inverters from European electricity grid P-10-2025-001967	Priority written question	12 Aug 2025
31 Mar 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the execution spree in Iran and confirmation of the death sentences of activists Behrouz Ehsani and Mehdi Hassani B-10-2025-0224	Motion for a resolutionwith 18 co-authors	—
12 Feb 2025	LinkedIn temporarily suspends University Lecturer account for organizing an event on the Uyghurs E-10-2025-000656	Written question	16 Jun 2025
29 Jan 2025	German version of Russia Today back on X despite EU sanctions P-10-2025-000391	Priority written question	7 Mar 2025
20 Jan 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages B-10-2025-0082	Motion for a resolutionwith 17 co-authors	—
18 Dec 2024	Sanctioning and deterring hybrid operations P-10-2024-003032	Priority written question	3 Feb 2025
16 Dec 2024	Adoption of an EU strategy for nuclear fusion E-10-2024-002958	Written questionwith 15 co-authors	17 Mar 2025
25 Nov 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and Russia B-10-2024-0198	Motion for a resolutionwith 17 co-authors	—
25 Nov 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the increasing and systemic repression against women in Iran B-10-2024-0202	Motion for a resolutionwith 16 co-authors	—
16 Sept 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States B-10-2024-0033	Motion for a resolutionwith 16 co-authors	—

Amendments tabled in committee, 90

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-786820	CJ72	1
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-790968	CJ72	6
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791883	CJ72	15
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791072	CJ72	5
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-790967	CJ72	2
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791071	CJ72	4
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790938	CJ53	8
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790937	CJ53	6
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790935	CJ53	10
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790933	CJ53	6

Show all 90 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Renew Europe Renew · Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism

National delegation

Delegation Netherlands National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197780?docs=all&period=2026&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Bart GROOTHUIS”. Member record. memberId 197780. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197780?docs=all&period=2026&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197780. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197780?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-197780,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Bart GROOTHUIS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197780?docs=all&period=2026&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197780?docs=all&period=2026&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197780. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197780. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Renew

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 33

Amendments tabled in committee, 90

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928