Member

Alexander BERNHUBER

EPP · Austria

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Austria
Roll-call participation: 87.5 %ⓘ of 2 521 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.9 % · 2026, roll calls
With majority line: 94.9 %ⓘ of 2 207 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.7 %

More facts (5)

National party: ÖVP Österreichische Volkspartei
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 84 of 2 118 votesⓘ
Committees: AGRI (substitute), ENVI, PETI
Member id: 197648

National party: ÖVP Österreichische Volkspartei
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 84 of 2 118 votesⓘ
Committees: AGRI (substitute), ENVI, PETI
Member id: 197648

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

87.5 %

2 207 of 2 521 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 91.0 % (−3.5 pts)

Chamber median: 90.9 %

With majority line ⓘ

94.9 %

2 095 of 2 207 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.7 % (+1.2 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.0 %

84 of 2 118 votes where their group had a clear line

49 opposite (for ↔ against), 33 abstained against the line, 2 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

2.2 %

49 of 2 207 votes cast

Participation 87.5 % — EPP median 91.0 %, 189 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 189 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Alexander BERNHUBER	87.5 %
EPP median	91.0 %
Lowest in the group	2.5 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	189

With majority line 94.9 % — EPP median 93.7 %, 188 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 188 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Alexander BERNHUBER	94.9 %
EPP median	93.7 %
Lowest in the group	70.9 %
Highest in the group	99.9 %
Members	188

2026, 2 521 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 3 of 34 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	67	64
21 Jan 2026	112	104
22 Jan 2026	58	56
9 Feb 2026	2	0
10 Feb 2026	38	38
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	0
24 Feb 2026	43	42
9 Mar 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	197	177
11 Mar 2026	60	52
12 Mar 2026	34	33
25 Mar 2026	3	2
26 Mar 2026	69	67
27 Apr 2026	2	2
28 Apr 2026	225	209
29 Apr 2026	296	283
30 Apr 2026	68	63
18 May 2026	4	3
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	88
21 May 2026	98	83
15 Jun 2026	2	0
16 Jun 2026	40	40
17 Jun 2026	127	111
18 Jun 2026	77	75
6 Jul 2026	2	2
7 Jul 2026	72	72
8 Jul 2026	144	135
9 Jul 2026	67	64
14 Sept 2026	1	1
15 Sept 2026	155	128
16 Sept 2026	80	76
17 Sept 2026	124	120

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Sophia KIRCHER	Sophia KIRCHER	EPP	Austria	96 % of 4 487 shared	89 %
Select Angelika WINZIG	Angelika WINZIG	EPP	Austria	95 % of 4 985 shared	89 %
Select Reinhold LOPATKA	Reinhold LOPATKA	EPP	Austria	95 % of 4 782 shared	89 %
Select Marie-Sophie CHRIST	Marie-Sophie CHRIST	EPP	Germany	94 % of 1 485 shared	89 %
Select Lukas MANDL	Lukas MANDL	EPP	Austria	94 % of 4 665 shared	89 %
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	93 % of 4 213 shared	89 %
Select Axel VOSS	Axel VOSS	EPP	Germany	93 % of 4 071 shared	89 %
Select Alexandra MEHNERT	Alexandra MEHNERT	EPP	Germany	93 % of 4 579 shared	89 %
Select Stefan BERGER	Stefan BERGER	EPP	Germany	93 % of 4 431 shared	89 %
Select Oliver SCHENK	Oliver SCHENK	EPP	Germany	92 % of 4 991 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	84 % of 4 536 shared	82 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	83 % of 4 091 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	83 % of 4 472 shared	82 %
Select Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON	Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON	Renew	Finland	83 % of 4 556 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	83 % of 4 899 shared	82 %
Select Benoit CASSART	Benoit CASSART	Renew	Belgium	82 % of 4 603 shared	82 %
Select Olivier CHASTEL	Olivier CHASTEL	Renew	Belgium	82 % of 4 630 shared	82 %
Select Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Renew	Germany	82 % of 4 908 shared	82 %
Select Elsi KATAINEN	Elsi KATAINEN	Renew	Finland	82 % of 5 049 shared	82 %
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Renew	Romania	82 % of 3 700 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI Committee	Member	20 Jan 2025	now
Committee on PetitionsPETI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation to the Cariforum-EU Parliamentary CommitteeDCAR Joint parliamentary committee	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Caribbean-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDCAB Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Biodiversity, Hunting and CountrysideIG10-04 Intergroup / working group	Member	4 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on Sustainable LivestockIG10-15 Intergroup / working group	Chair co	31 Jan 2025	now
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food SafetyENVI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	19 Jan 2025

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
First Caribbean EU Parliamentary Assembly	Official delegation	DCAB	28 Jan 2026
Ensuring faster registration and uptake of biological control agents	Rapporteur	ENVI	11 Jun 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation	PETI	19 May 2025
Standing Forestry Committee DACI	Shadow rapporteur	ENVI	15 Jan 2025
Monitoring framework for resilient European forests 2023/0413(COD)	Shadow rapporteur	ENVI	23 Oct 2024
No dossier named	Official delegation		12 Sept 2024

Show all 6 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

18 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 21 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
14 Sept 2026	Emissions trading (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 May 2026	Presentation of the Fertilisers Action Plan (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
30 Apr 2026	How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases? (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 3 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
24 Nov 2025	Ensuring faster registration and uptake of biological control agents (short presentation)	Speech · 4 min	Read
24 Nov 2025	30th anniversary of the Barcelona Process and the new pact for the Mediterranean (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Oct 2025	Common agricultural policy (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Oct 2025	Common agricultural policy (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
13 Mar 2025	A Vision for Agriculture and Food (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
13 Mar 2025	A Vision for Agriculture and Food (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 18 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 31

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
12 Jun 2026	Risk of full dependency on China for vitamins and potential implications for food and health security E-10-2026-002428	Written questionwith 4 co-authors	29 Jul 2026
8 Apr 2026	Complexity of the AGRIP application process and dependence on external consultancies E-10-2026-001416	Written question	4 Jun 2026
8 Apr 2026	Targeting of import controls and public access to control data E-10-2026-001413	Written question	14 Jul 2026
8 Apr 2026	Data basis for the announced reinforcement of food import controls E-10-2026-001412	Written question	22 Jun 2026
8 Apr 2026	Absence of national budget allocations and structural disadvantages for smaller Member States E-10-2026-001415	Written question	1 Jun 2026
8 Apr 2026	Geographical imbalance in the distribution of AGRIP funding E-10-2026-001414	Written question	29 May 2026
3 Jul 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the draft Commission regulation on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1093 of 22 May 2025 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards a list of countries that present a low or high risk of producing relevant commodities for which the relevant products do not comply with Article 3, point (a) B-10-2025-0321	Motion for a resolution	—
4 Jun 2025	Implementation of the EU Deforestation Regulation – platform E-10-2025-002230	Written question	27 Jan 2026
4 Jun 2025	Information on the EU Deforestation Regulation’s benchmarking system E-10-2025-002231	Written question	9 Oct 2025
26 Feb 2025	Inconsistencies in published occupational-accident statistics P-10-2025-000848	Priority written question	22 Apr 2025
11 Feb 2025	Closer-to-nature forestry initiative and the planned EU certification framework E-10-2025-000610	Written questionwith 2 co-authors	8 Apr 2025
5 Feb 2025	Full transparency on the green non-governmental organisation lobbying scandal in the Parliament E-10-2025-000529	Written questionwith 1 co-author	23 Apr 2025
27 Jan 2025	Public procurement that takes security of supply into account E-10-2025-000360	Written question	30 Apr 2025
7 Nov 2024	Traceability and control in connection with Brazilian beef P-10-2024-002460	Priority written question	19 Dec 2024
26 Sept 2024	The spread of bluetongue virus throughout the EU E-10-2024-001845	Written questionwith 39 co-authors	15 Nov 2024
17 Sept 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate change B-10-2024-0057	Motion for a resolutionwith 24 co-authors	—
7 Aug 2024	Proportionality of EU rules in the forestry sector E-10-2024-001495	Written question	1 Oct 2024
7 Aug 2024	Promoting the circular economy in agriculture E-10-2024-001490	Written question	13 Sept 2024
7 Aug 2024	Definitions of forests and their impact E-10-2024-001496	Written question	3 Oct 2024
7 Aug 2024	Strengthening the competitiveness of Europe’s agricultural sector E-10-2024-001491	Written question	16 Oct 2024
7 Aug 2024	EUDR and causal link between Union consumption and global deforestation E-10-2024-001500	Written question	11 Oct 2024
7 Aug 2024	EU forest owners disadvantaged by the Regulation on deforestation-free products (EUDR) E-10-2024-001498	Written question	7 Oct 2024
7 Aug 2024	Technical basis for the assessment of countries under EUDR E-10-2024-001499	Written question	7 Oct 2024
7 Aug 2024	Economic impact of the provisions of the EUDR E-10-2024-001497	Written question	22 Nov 2024
7 Aug 2024	Promotion of direct marketing and regional products E-10-2024-001488	Written question	24 Sept 2024
7 Aug 2024	Support for small and medium-sized farms E-10-2024-001487	Written question	10 Sept 2024
7 Aug 2024	EU overstepping its competences in the field of forestry E-10-2024-001494	Written question	9 Sept 2024
7 Aug 2024	Promoting sustainable farming practices E-10-2024-001486	Written question	13 Sept 2024
7 Aug 2024	Supporting young farmers E-10-2024-001493	Written question	20 Sept 2024
7 Aug 2024	Improving digital infrastructure in rural areas E-10-2024-001489	Written question	20 Sept 2024
7 Aug 2024	Promoting agricultural research and innovation E-10-2024-001492	Written question	23 Sept 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 90

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
28 Jul 2026	Amending Directives 2008/98/EC, 2010/75/EU, (EU) 2015/2193 and (EU) 2024/1785 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden ENVI-AM-791123	ENVI	18
20 Jul 2026	Amending Directives 2008/98/EC, 2010/75/EU, (EU) 2015/2193 and (EU) 2024/1785 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden ENVI-AM-790834	ENVI	7
15 Jul 2026	Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden ENVI-AM-790846	ENVI	6
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790915	AGRI	2
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790958	AGRI	2
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790899	AGRI	3
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790957	AGRI	10
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790956	AGRI	5
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790955	AGRI	4
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790954	AGRI	7

Show all 90 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Austria National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197648?docs=all&period=2026&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Alexander BERNHUBER”. Member record. memberId 197648. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197648?docs=all&period=2026&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197648. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197648?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-197648,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Alexander BERNHUBER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197648?docs=all&period=2026&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197648?docs=all&period=2026&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197648. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197648. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 31

Amendments tabled in committee, 90

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928