Member

Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

ECR · Poland

Group: ECR
Country: Poland
Roll-call participation: 95.8 %ⓘ of 2 521 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.9 % · 2026, roll calls
With majority line: 90.0 %ⓘ of 2 408 votes where the group had a line · ECR median 90.5 %

More facts (5)

National party: PiS Prawo i Sprawiedliwość
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 92 of 2 090 votesⓘ
Committees: CONT, LIBE (substitute)
Member id: 197501

National party: PiS Prawo i Sprawiedliwość
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 92 of 2 090 votesⓘ
Committees: CONT, LIBE (substitute)
Member id: 197501

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

95.8 %

2 414 of 2 521 roll calls while in office

ECR median: 91.9 % (+3.9 pts)

Chamber median: 90.9 %

With majority line ⓘ

90.0 %

2 167 of 2 408 votes where their group had a line

ECR median: 90.5 % (−0.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.4 %

92 of 2 090 votes where their group had a clear line

48 opposite (for ↔ against), 40 abstained against the line, 4 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

8.5 %

206 of 2 414 votes cast

Participation 95.8 % — ECR median 91.9 %, 81 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 81 members of the ECR with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI	95.8 %
ECR median	91.9 %
Lowest in the group	47.8 %
Highest in the group	99.9 %
Members	81

With majority line 90.0 % — ECR median 90.5 %, 81 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 81 members of the ECR with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI	90.0 %
ECR median	90.5 %
Lowest in the group	63.8 %
Highest in the group	94.3 %
Members	81

2026, 2 521 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of ECR; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 10 of 34 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	67	67
21 Jan 2026	112	112
22 Jan 2026	58	58
9 Feb 2026	2	0
10 Feb 2026	38	38
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	141
24 Feb 2026	43	43
9 Mar 2026	1	0
10 Mar 2026	197	197
11 Mar 2026	60	60
12 Mar 2026	34	34
25 Mar 2026	3	0
26 Mar 2026	69	69
27 Apr 2026	2	0
28 Apr 2026	225	225
29 Apr 2026	296	293
30 Apr 2026	68	66
18 May 2026	4	0
19 May 2026	3	0
20 May 2026	96	96
21 May 2026	98	97
15 Jun 2026	2	0
16 Jun 2026	40	40
17 Jun 2026	127	125
18 Jun 2026	77	0
6 Jul 2026	2	0
7 Jul 2026	72	72
8 Jul 2026	144	143
9 Jul 2026	67	67
14 Sept 2026	1	0
15 Sept 2026	155	154
16 Sept 2026	80	80
17 Sept 2026	124	124

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ECR

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	ECR	Poland	98 % of 5 484 shared	81 %
Select Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	ECR	Poland	98 % of 5 014 shared	81 %
Select Marlena MALĄG	Marlena MALĄG	ECR	Poland	97 % of 5 426 shared	81 %
Select Bogdan RZOŃCA	Bogdan RZOŃCA	ECR	Poland	97 % of 5 504 shared	81 %
Select Piotr MÜLLER	Piotr MÜLLER	ECR	Poland	97 % of 4 727 shared	81 %
Select Anna ZALEWSKA	Anna ZALEWSKA	ECR	Poland	97 % of 5 487 shared	81 %
Select Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	ECR	Poland	97 % of 3 621 shared	81 %
Select Daniel OBAJTEK	Daniel OBAJTEK	ECR	Poland	97 % of 4 554 shared	81 %
Select Beata SZYDŁO	Beata SZYDŁO	ECR	Poland	97 % of 5 457 shared	81 %
Select Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA	Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA	ECR	Poland	97 % of 5 363 shared	81 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ	Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ	Patriots	Portugal	74 % of 5 294 shared	68 %
Select Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL	Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL	Patriots	Spain	74 % of 4 904 shared	68 %
Select Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA	Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA	Patriots	Spain	73 % of 5 263 shared	68 %
Select Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN	Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN	Patriots	Spain	73 % of 5 167 shared	68 %
Select Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN	Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN	Patriots	Spain	73 % of 5 499 shared	68 %
Select Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS	Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS	No group	Romania	73 % of 4 572 shared	48 %
Select Anna BRYŁKA	Anna BRYŁKA changed group	Patriots	Poland	73 % of 5 038 shared	67 %
Select Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS	Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS	Patriots	Spain	73 % of 4 193 shared	68 %
Select Hermann TERTSCH	Hermann TERTSCH	Patriots	Spain	73 % of 4 105 shared	68 %
Select Nikola BARTŮŠEK	Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group	ECR	Czechia	72 % of 4 548 shared	62 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-Türkiye Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-TR Joint parliamentary committee	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America, including the EU-Central America Association Parliamentary CommitteeDCAM Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Committee on BudgetsBUDG Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	6 Oct 2024

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	CONT	28 Jan 2026
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Joint Undertakings	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	17 Nov 2025
2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - European Council and Council	Rapporteur	CONT	24 Sept 2025
Combating VAT fraud – the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation when it comes to VAT fraud and its impact on the EU budget	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	3 Jul 2025
2024/0804(NLE) Partial renewal of Members of the Court of Auditors – BG nominee	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	14 Nov 2024
2024/2030(DEC) 2023 Discharge - Decentralised Agencies	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	10 Oct 2024
2024/2031 (DEC) 2023 Discharge: General budget of the EU - Joint Undertakings	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	10 Oct 2024
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	1 Oct 2024
\"\"2023 Discharge – European Council and Council – 2024/2021(DEC)\"\"	Rapporteur	CONT	12 Sept 2024
2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - European External Action Service - 2024/2024(DEC)	Rapporteur	CONT	12 Sept 2024

Show all 14 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

53 contributions recorded, 25 written statements; 6 on behalf of their group; 50 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
8 Jul 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers (debate)	Statement	Read
16 Jun 2026	Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation) (debate)	Statement	Read
30 Apr 2026	How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases? (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	Situation in Lebanon: implementation of the ceasefire, support peace efforts and humanitarian access (debate)	Statement	Read
25 Mar 2026	Combating corruption (debate)	Statement	Read
24 Feb 2026	Four years of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine (debate)	Statement	Read
11 Feb 2026	Topical debate requested by a political group (S&D) (Rule 169) - State violence in Minneapolis and the rule of law in the United States (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate)	Statement	Read
21 Jan 2026	Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 Jan 2026	Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 98

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0420	Motion for a resolutionwith 19 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong-Kong, amid the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0407	Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders B-10-2026-0411	Motion for a resolutionwith 10 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0419	Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0356	Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Threat of War Crimes, the Escalating Violations of International Humanitarian Law and the Human Rights Situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0363	Motion for a resolutionwith 15 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan B-10-2026-0351	Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors	—
17 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso B-10-2026-0329	Motion for a resolutionwith 18 co-authors	—
16 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0327	Motion for a resolutionwith 19 co-authors	—
15 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Nicaragua - the cases of Carlos Brenes, Salvadora del Socorro Martínez Aburto and Brooklyn Rivera B-10-2026-0317	Motion for a resolutionwith 20 co-authors	—

Show all 98 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 26

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
26 Jun 2026	Combating VAT fraud – the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation when it comes to VAT fraud and its impact on the EU budget CONT-AM-790210	CONT	6
20 Feb 2026	Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Commission CONT-AM-784513	CONT	30
20 Feb 2026	Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Commission CONT-AM-784512	CONT	22
19 Feb 2026	Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Agencies CONT-AM-784141	CONT	18
16 Feb 2026	Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 CONT-AM-782394	CONT	20
30 Jan 2026	Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - European External Action Service CONT-AM-784151	CONT	9
28 Jan 2026	Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Joint Undertakings CONT-AM-782491	CONT	10
28 Jan 2026	Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - European Economic and Social Committee CONT-AM-784136	CONT	3
27 Jan 2026	Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Committee of the Regions CONT-AM-782492	CONT	4
27 Jan 2026	Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - European Council and Council CONT-AM-782497	CONT	1

Show all 26 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political groups this term

Group European Conservatives and Reformists ECR · Right-wing · national conservatism, EU-critical

National delegation

Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197501?period=2026&rows=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI”. Member record. memberId 197501. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197501?period=2026&rows=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197501. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197501?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-197501,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197501?period=2026&rows=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197501?period=2026&rows=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197501. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197501. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within ECR

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 98

Amendments tabled in committee, 26

Connections

Political groups this term

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928