Member

Magdalena ADAMOWICZ

EPP · Poland

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Poland
Roll-call participation: 96.9 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line: 90.8 %ⓘ of 2 802 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.5 %

More facts (5)

National party: Independent
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 182 of 2 665 votesⓘ
Committees: JURI (substitute), LIBE, PECH (substitute), TRAN (substitute)
Member id: 197490

National party: Independent
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 182 of 2 665 votesⓘ
Committees: JURI (substitute), LIBE, PECH (substitute), TRAN (substitute)
Member id: 197490

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

96.9 %

2 802 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 91.0 % (+5.9 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

90.8 %

2 545 of 2 802 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.5 % (−2.7 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

6.8 %

182 of 2 665 votes where their group had a clear line

138 opposite (for ↔ against), 44 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

2.5 %

70 of 2 802 votes cast

Participation 96.9 % — EPP median 91.0 %, 187 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 187 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	96.9 %
EPP median	91.0 %
Lowest in the group	23.2 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	187

With majority line 90.8 % — EPP median 93.5 %, 187 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 187 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	90.8 %
EPP median	93.5 %
Lowest in the group	66.7 %
Highest in the group	98.9 %
Members	187

2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	0
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	41
10 Feb 2025	1	1
11 Feb 2025	32	31
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	29
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	221
13 Mar 2025	24	24
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	236
3 Apr 2025	62	60
5 May 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	207
8 May 2025	103	102
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	52
16 Jun 2025	2	2
17 Jun 2025	41	41
18 Jun 2025	91	91
19 Jun 2025	87	73
7 Jul 2025	1	1
8 Jul 2025	55	54
9 Jul 2025	134	130
10 Jul 2025	36	36
8 Sept 2025	1	0
9 Sept 2025	101	96
10 Sept 2025	34	32
11 Sept 2025	69	68
6 Oct 2025	2	2
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	55
9 Oct 2025	65	65
20 Oct 2025	3	3
21 Oct 2025	13	12
22 Oct 2025	186	182
23 Oct 2025	55	53
13 Nov 2025	267	261
24 Nov 2025	3	3
25 Nov 2025	75	75
26 Nov 2025	100	99
27 Nov 2025	125	125
15 Dec 2025	4	4
16 Dec 2025	66	66
17 Dec 2025	43	43
18 Dec 2025	42	41

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Ewa KOPACZ	Ewa KOPACZ	EPP	Poland	97 % of 5 501 shared	89 %
Select Andrzej BUŁA	Andrzej BUŁA	EPP	Poland	97 % of 5 040 shared	89 %
Select Krzysztof BREJZA	Krzysztof BREJZA	EPP	Poland	97 % of 5 106 shared	89 %
Select Mirosława NYKIEL	Mirosława NYKIEL	EPP	Poland	97 % of 4 928 shared	89 %
Select Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK	Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK	EPP	Poland	97 % of 5 171 shared	89 %
Select Andrzej HALICKI	Andrzej HALICKI	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 113 shared	89 %
Select Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ	Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 107 shared	89 %
Select Dariusz JOŃSKI	Dariusz JOŃSKI	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 413 shared	89 %
Select Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 253 shared	89 %
Select Łukasz KOHUT	Łukasz KOHUT	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 350 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	84 % of 4 964 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	84 % of 4 830 shared	82 %
Select Sophie WILMÈS	Sophie WILMÈS	Renew	Belgium	83 % of 3 763 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	83 % of 5 338 shared	82 %
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Renew	Romania	83 % of 3 937 shared	82 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	83 % of 4 317 shared	82 %
Select Ivars IJABS	Ivars IJABS	Renew	Latvia	83 % of 4 193 shared	82 %
Select Nathalie LOISEAU	Nathalie LOISEAU	Renew	France	83 % of 4 456 shared	82 %
Select Dainius ŽALIMAS	Dainius ŽALIMAS	Renew	Lithuania	82 % of 5 135 shared	82 %
Select Anouk VAN BRUG	Anouk VAN BRUG	Renew	Netherlands	82 % of 4 090 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on FisheriesPECH Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with Central AsiaDCAS Delegation	Substitute	1 Apr 2025	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of South AsiaDSAS Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Mental HealthIG10-17 Intergroup / working group	Member	5 Feb 2025	now

Show all 8 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Cloud and AI Development Act	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	LIBE	25 Sept 2026
23rd EU-Kazakhstan Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (PCC) in Astana and Aktau	Official delegation	DCAS	25 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	PECH	28 Apr 2026
No dossier named	Opinion rapporteur	JURI	20 Nov 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation	PECH	29 Sept 2025
No dossier named	Rapporteur	JURI	7 Jul 2025
ENVI delegation to IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee meeting (MEPC), London, UK - 7-9 April 2025	Official delegation		19 Mar 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation		10 Feb 2025
No dossier named	Opinion rapporteur	TRAN	19 Dec 2024
kodyfikacje i ujednolicenia	Rapporteur	JURI	2 Oct 2024

Show all 10 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

33 contributions recorded, 3 written statements; 36 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
15 Sept 2026	Hybrid attacks against the EU Member States (joint debate)	Statement	Read
9 Jul 2026	Evaluation of the common fisheries policy and follow-up (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 May 2026	EU cybersecurity and preparedness in view of advanced AI systems (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
18 May 2026	The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
18 May 2026	The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
28 Apr 2026	Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
12 Mar 2026	Prevention and treatment of obesity (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Feb 2026	Presentation of the action plan against cyberbullying (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 Jan 2026	Air passenger rights (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 33 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 42

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0418	Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0394	Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong-Kong, amid the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0405	Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors	—
10 Sept 2026	Absence of an enhanced safeguard mechanism for fishery and aquaculture products under the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement E-10-2026-003616	Written question	Not yet answered
10 Sept 2026	Implementation of Regulation (EU) 2026/687 since the start of the provisional application of the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement E-10-2026-003615	Written question	Not yet answered
10 Sept 2026	Sexual exploitation of children in travel and tourism: closing the gaps beyond the EU’s borders E-10-2026-003633	Written questionwith 11 co-authors	Not yet answered
10 Sept 2026	Fulfilment of the Commission’s commitments on import controls made alongside the EU-Mercosur Safeguard Regulation E-10-2026-003617	Written question	Not yet answered
2 Sept 2026	GNSS signal interference and spoofing in the Baltic Sea Region E-10-2026-003449	Written question	Not yet answered
21 Jul 2026	Implementation of the recommendations of the Commission’s Special Panel on children in the digital world E-10-2026-003064	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	11 Sept 2026
13 Jul 2026	Missing and runaway children as an indicator of violence, abuse and grooming E-10-2026-002868	Written questionwith 15 co-authors	Not yet answered

Show all 42 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 18

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
27 Aug 2026	Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791869	REGI	29
23 Jul 2026	Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilienceand cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791870	REGI	5
16 Jul 2026	General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections PECH-AM-791014	PECH	4
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790094	CJ71	1
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790099	CJ71	4
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790104	CJ71	2
19 Jun 2026	Clean corporate vehicles CJ46-AM-790087	CJ46	30
19 Jun 2026	Clean corporate vehicles CJ46-AM-789892	CJ46	23
18 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on clean corporate vehicles CJ46-AM-789893	CJ46	3
27 Apr 2026	Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787838	CJ05	1

Show all 18 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197490?period=2025&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Magdalena ADAMOWICZ”. Member record. memberId 197490. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197490?period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197490. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197490?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-197490,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Magdalena ADAMOWICZ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197490?period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197490?period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197490. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197490. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 42

Amendments tabled in committee, 18

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928