Member

Brando BENIFEI

S&D · Italy

Group: S&D
Country: Italy
Roll-call participation: 74.4 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line: 96.9 %ⓘ of 2 148 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 96.5 %

More facts (5)

National party: PD Partito Democratico
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 56 of 2 129 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO, IMCO (substitute), INTA, JURI (substitute)
Member id: 124867

National party: PD Partito Democratico
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 56 of 2 129 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO, IMCO (substitute), INTA, JURI (substitute)
Member id: 124867

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

74.4 %

2 150 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

S&D median: 90.0 % (−15.7 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

96.9 %

2 082 of 2 148 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 96.5 % (+0.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.6 %

56 of 2 129 votes where their group had a clear line

42 opposite (for ↔ against), 9 abstained against the line, 5 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

2.4 %

52 of 2 150 votes cast

Participation 74.4 % — S&D median 90.0 %, 136 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 136 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Brando BENIFEI	74.4 %
S&D median	90.0 %
Lowest in the group	54.5 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	136

With majority line 96.9 % — S&D median 96.5 %, 136 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 136 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Brando BENIFEI	96.9 %
S&D median	96.5 %
Lowest in the group	80.8 %
Highest in the group	99.5 %
Members	136

2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 14 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2025	2	0
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	43
10 Feb 2025	1	0
11 Feb 2025	32	0
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	28
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	224
13 Mar 2025	24	0
31 Mar 2025	3	1
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	156
3 Apr 2025	62	0
5 May 2025	5	0
6 May 2025	10	9
7 May 2025	220	207
8 May 2025	103	101
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	52
16 Jun 2025	2	1
17 Jun 2025	41	41
18 Jun 2025	91	0
19 Jun 2025	87	0
7 Jul 2025	1	0
8 Jul 2025	55	54
9 Jul 2025	134	132
10 Jul 2025	36	35
8 Sept 2025	1	0
9 Sept 2025	101	96
10 Sept 2025	34	33
11 Sept 2025	69	66
6 Oct 2025	2	0
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	53
9 Oct 2025	65	61
20 Oct 2025	3	0
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	180
23 Oct 2025	55	52
13 Nov 2025	267	0
24 Nov 2025	3	3
25 Nov 2025	75	75
26 Nov 2025	100	100
27 Nov 2025	125	120
15 Dec 2025	4	0
16 Dec 2025	66	65
17 Dec 2025	43	41
18 Dec 2025	42	42

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Sandro RUOTOLO	Sandro RUOTOLO	S&D	Italy	98 % of 3 431 shared	93 %
Select Giuseppe LUPO	Giuseppe LUPO	S&D	Italy	98 % of 4 376 shared	93 %
Select Matteo RICCI	Matteo RICCI	S&D	Italy	97 % of 3 875 shared	93 %
Select Antonio DECARO	Antonio DECARO Former member	S&D	Italy	97 % of 1 689 shared	93 %
Select Irene TINAGLI	Irene TINAGLI	S&D	Italy	97 % of 4 520 shared	93 %
Select Annalisa CORRADO	Annalisa CORRADO	S&D	Italy	97 % of 3 605 shared	93 %
Select Alessandra MORETTI	Alessandra MORETTI	S&D	Italy	97 % of 4 423 shared	93 %
Select Nicola ZINGARETTI	Nicola ZINGARETTI	S&D	Italy	97 % of 4 140 shared	93 %
Select Stefano BONACCINI	Stefano BONACCINI	S&D	Italy	97 % of 4 334 shared	93 %
Select Camilla LAURETI	Camilla LAURETI	S&D	Italy	97 % of 4 608 shared	93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Elisabetta GUALMINI	Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group	Renew	Italy	88 % of 1 567 shared	86 %
Select Jana TOOM	Jana TOOM	Renew	Estonia	88 % of 3 913 shared	86 %
Select Irena JOVEVA	Irena JOVEVA	Renew	Slovenia	88 % of 4 346 shared	86 %
Select Ľudovít ÓDOR	Ľudovít ÓDOR	Renew	Slovakia	87 % of 4 366 shared	86 %
Select Brigitte VAN DEN BERG	Brigitte VAN DEN BERG	Renew	Netherlands	87 % of 4 076 shared	86 %
Select Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Renew	Netherlands	87 % of 4 585 shared	86 %
Select Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE	Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE	Renew	Netherlands	87 % of 4 640 shared	86 %
Select Marjan ŠAREC	Marjan ŠAREC	Renew	Slovenia	87 % of 4 045 shared	86 %
Select Pascal CANFIN	Pascal CANFIN	Renew	France	87 % of 4 272 shared	86 %
Select Dainius ŽALIMAS	Dainius ŽALIMAS	Renew	Lithuania	87 % of 4 275 shared	86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on International TradeINTA Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the Federative Republic of BrazilD-BR Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Chair	30 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with MercosurDMER Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group	Member	16 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Anti-Racism and DiversityIG10-02 Intergroup / working group	Member	14 Feb 2025	now

Show all 19 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Official delegation	INTA	22 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Delegation chair	D-US	19 Aug 2026
No dossier named	Delegation chair	D-US	23 Jul 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	AFCO	9 Jul 2026
91st EU-US inter-parliamentary meeting of the Transatlantic Legislators’ Dialogue, 19-20 June 2026, Nicosia, Cyprus)	Official delegation	D-US	15 Jun 2026
EUROLAT mission to Mexico	Official delegation	DLAT	19 May 2026
No dossier named	Delegation chair	D-US	19 May 2026
No dossier named	Delegation chair	D-US	13 May 2026
Monitoring and controlling drug precursors and repealing Regulations (EC) No 273/2004 and (EC) No 111/2005	Shadow rapporteur	INTA	13 Apr 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	JURI	12 Mar 2026

Show all 39 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

63 contributions recorded; 6 on behalf of their group; 86 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	Stop gold-plating, relieve SMEs: Member States must implement EU legislation without adding extra bureaucracy (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Jul 2026	The EU’s role in the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip and the accountability of Israel under international law (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Presentation of the Action Plan on Cybersecurity and AI (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	EU-Mexico (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Jun 2026	Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
15 Jun 2026	Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America - Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods on behalf of S&D	Speech · 2 min	Read
19 May 2026	Opportunities and challenges presented by a comprehensive artificial intelligence strategy for EU trade (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
19 May 2026	Opportunities and challenges presented by a comprehensive artificial intelligence strategy for EU trade (debate)	Speech · 4 min	Read
19 May 2026	EU governance under pressure – institutional responses to global challenges (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 May 2026	EU cybersecurity and preparedness in view of advanced AI systems (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 132

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
14 Sept 2026	Exclusion of purchases of Russian sable pelts from EU sanctions E-10-2026-003651	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	Not yet answered
8 Sept 2026	Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539	Written questionwith 67 co-authors	Not yet answered
7 Sept 2026	Extraterritorial impact of the US designation of Autistici/Inventati as a terrorist entity P-10-2026-003526	Priority written questionwith 28 co-authors	Not yet answered
24 Jul 2026	Compliance with the law at the ‘suitable premises’ temporarily holding non-EU nationals subject to a return decision E-10-2026-003120	Written question	11 Sept 2026
22 Jul 2026	Cutro shipwreck, tragedies at sea and the right of vicitms’ families E-10-2026-003097	Written questionwith 23 co-authors	22 Sept 2026
16 Jul 2026	Urgent appeal for the release of Dr Hussam Abu Safiya E-10-2026-003029	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	2 Sept 2026
15 Jul 2026	State aid aspects in the proposed reform of the Italian port system P-10-2026-002939	Priority written question	20 Aug 2026
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
10 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recruitment of children by organised crime B-10-2026-0275	Motion for a resolutionwith 33 co-authors	—
10 Jun 2026	Potential conflict of interest in the appointment of the Special Envoy for Industrial AI P-10-2026-002401	Priority written questionwith 37 co-authors	13 Aug 2026

Show all 132 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 86

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791874	CJ72	22
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-786820	CJ72	35
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-790968	CJ72	29
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791071	CJ72	42
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791883	CJ72	5
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791073	CJ72	9
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791072	CJ72	46
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791873	CJ72	7
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-790967	CJ72	10
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – ‘EU Inc.’ JURI-AM-791129	JURI	4

Show all 86 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats S&D · Centre-left · social democracy

National delegation

Delegation Italy National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124867?period=2025&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Brando BENIFEI”. Member record. memberId 124867. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124867?period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124867. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/124867?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-124867,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Brando BENIFEI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124867?period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124867?period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 124867. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124867. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within S&D

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 132

Amendments tabled in committee, 86

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928