Member

Caterina CHINNICI

EPP · Italy

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Italy
Roll-call participation: 59.8 %ⓘ of 261 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.8 % · 2026, final votes
With majority line: 98.1 %ⓘ of 156 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 94.9 %

More facts (5)

National party: FI Forza Italia
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 2 of 146 votesⓘ
Committees: CONT (vice-chair), LIBE
Member id: 124861

National party: FI Forza Italia
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 2 of 146 votesⓘ
Committees: CONT (vice-chair), LIBE
Member id: 124861

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

59.8 %

156 of 261 final votes while in office

EPP median: 91.2 % (−31.4 pts)

Chamber median: 90.8 %

With majority line ⓘ

98.1 %

153 of 156 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 94.9 % (+3.2 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.4 %

2 of 146 votes where their group had a clear line

2 opposite (for ↔ against), 0 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.0 %

0 of 156 votes cast

Participation 59.8 % — EPP median 91.2 %, 187 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 187 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Caterina CHINNICI	59.8 %
EPP median	91.2 %
Lowest in the group	3.8 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	187

With majority line 98.1 % — EPP median 94.9 %, 185 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 185 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Caterina CHINNICI	98.1 %
EPP median	94.9 %
Lowest in the group	73.6 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	185

2026, 261 final votes; 261 of 342 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: For ≠ group	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 9 of 26 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	6	6
21 Jan 2026	8	8
22 Jan 2026	8	8
10 Feb 2026	8	8
11 Feb 2026	10	10
12 Feb 2026	8	0
24 Feb 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	9	8
11 Mar 2026	12	12
12 Mar 2026	6	6
26 Mar 2026	13	13
28 Apr 2026	14	0
29 Apr 2026	17	0
30 Apr 2026	11	0
19 May 2026	3	0
20 May 2026	12	12
21 May 2026	10	8
16 Jun 2026	10	0
17 Jun 2026	16	0
18 Jun 2026	7	0
7 Jul 2026	15	0
8 Jul 2026	15	15
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	12
16 Sept 2026	16	16
17 Sept 2026	10	9

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Giusi PRINCI	Giusi PRINCI	EPP	Italy	97 % of 4 112 shared	89 %
Select Flavio TOSI	Flavio TOSI	EPP	Italy	97 % of 3 837 shared	89 %
Select Letizia MORATTI	Letizia MORATTI	EPP	Italy	97 % of 3 047 shared	89 %
Select Marco FALCONE	Marco FALCONE	EPP	Italy	97 % of 3 687 shared	89 %
Select Salvatore DE MEO	Salvatore DE MEO	EPP	Italy	96 % of 3 762 shared	89 %
Select Siegfried MUREŞAN	Siegfried MUREŞAN	EPP	Romania	95 % of 4 039 shared	89 %
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	95 % of 3 325 shared	89 %
Select Pekka TOVERI	Pekka TOVERI	EPP	Finland	95 % of 3 493 shared	89 %
Select Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	EPP	Lithuania	95 % of 3 523 shared	89 %
Select Herbert DORFMANN	Herbert DORFMANN	EPP	Italy	95 % of 4 135 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	88 % of 3 855 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	87 % of 3 816 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	86 % of 4 027 shared	82 %
Select Olivier CHASTEL	Olivier CHASTEL	Renew	Belgium	86 % of 3 824 shared	82 %
Select Sophie WILMÈS	Sophie WILMÈS	Renew	Belgium	86 % of 2 841 shared	82 %
Select Elsi KATAINEN	Elsi KATAINEN	Renew	Finland	86 % of 4 129 shared	82 %
Select Ivars IJABS	Ivars IJABS	Renew	Latvia	86 % of 3 545 shared	82 %
Select Benoit CASSART	Benoit CASSART	Renew	Belgium	86 % of 3 687 shared	82 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	86 % of 3 616 shared	82 %
Select Stine BOSSE	Stine BOSSE	Renew	Denmark	85 % of 4 044 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT Committee	Vice-chair	23 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-CL Joint parliamentary committee	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with IndiaD-IN Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working group	Chair co	19 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on Seas, Rivers, Islands and Coastal Areas (SEARICA)IG10-20 Intergroup / working group	Member	4 Feb 2025	now
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	22 Jul 2024
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	14 Jul 2026

Show all 8 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - Agencies	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	3 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	CONT	15 Jul 2026
New Eurojust Regulation	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	14 Jul 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	LIBE	5 May 2026
Authorising Member States to accept, in the interests of the European Union, the accession of Cabo Verde to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction	Shadow rapporteur	JURI	30 Mar 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 as regards the access of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) to value added tax information at Union level	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	CONT	30 Mar 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	LIBE	25 Feb 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	LIBE	26 Jan 2026
Conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union, of the one part, and the Republic of Ecuador, of the other part, on cooperation between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the Ecuadorian authorities competent for combatting serious crime and terrorism	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	19 Nov 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation	LIBE	12 Sept 2025

Show all 24 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

37 contributions recorded, 14 written statements; 1 on behalf of their group; 36 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
8 Jul 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Presentation of the programme of activities of the Irish Presidency (debate)	Statement	Read
20 May 2026	Recruitment of children by organised crime (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
20 May 2026	Rights, support and protection of victims of crime (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
20 May 2026	Recent proposals to fight poverty in the EU (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
25 Mar 2026	Combating corruption (debate)	Statement	Read
11 Feb 2026	International Day of Education, fighting inequalities in access to education (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
10 Feb 2026	Presentation of the action plan against cyberbullying (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
10 Feb 2026	Extreme weather events in particular in Portugal, southern Italy, Malta and Greece: European response in strengthening readiness, preparedness and solidarity mechanisms (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Feb 2026	Extreme weather events in particular in Portugal, southern Italy, Malta and Greece: European response in strengthening readiness, preparedness and solidarity mechanisms (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read

Show all 37 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 26

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
10 Sept 2026	Sexual exploitation of children in travel and tourism: closing the gaps beyond the EU’s borders E-10-2026-003633	Written questionwith 11 co-authors	Not yet answered
24 Aug 2026	The Ceuta migration crisis: potential jihadist infiltrations, securing Europe’s external borders and safeguarding the Schengen area E-10-2026-003310	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	Not yet answered
24 Aug 2026	The Ceuta migration crisis: potential jihadist infiltrations, securing Europe’s external borders and safeguarding the Schengen area E-10-2026-003309	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	Not yet answered
21 Jul 2026	Implementation of the recommendations of the Commission’s Special Panel on children in the digital world E-10-2026-003064	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	11 Sept 2026
13 Jul 2026	Missing and runaway children as an indicator of violence, abuse and grooming E-10-2026-002868	Written questionwith 15 co-authors	Not yet answered
10 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recruitment of children by organised crime B-10-2026-0275	Motion for a resolutionwith 33 co-authors	—
8 Jun 2026	Sardinia and Sicily: sharp increase in freight traffic costs and impact on businesses and consumers E-10-2026-002348	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	26 Aug 2026
6 May 2026	Continuity of tertiary education for pregnant women and women with children E-10-2026-001857	Written questionwith 46 co-authors	3 Jul 2026
27 Apr 2026	Ukrainian children forcibly transferred and deported by Russia E-10-2026-001705	Written questionwith 49 co-authors	14 Jul 2026
11 Mar 2026	The Middle East crisis’ impact on energy prices and the potential use of extraordinary EU measures P-10-2026-001009	Priority written questionwith 8 co-authors	20 May 2026

Show all 26 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 24

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
17 Apr 2026	Amending Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 as regards the access of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) to value added tax information at Union level CONT-AM-787676	CONT	10
28 Jan 2026	Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Court of Justice of the European Union CONT-AM-784145	CONT	7
28 Jan 2026	Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - European Data Protection Supervisor CONT-AM-782495	CONT	6
28 Jan 2026	Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Court of Auditors CONT-AM-782521	CONT	10
28 Jan 2026	Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - European Public Prosecutors Office (the ‘EPPO’) CONT-AM-784137	CONT	22
28 Jan 2026	Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - European Ombudsman CONT-AM-784148	CONT	11
22 Oct 2025	Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing HOUS-AM-778371	HOUS	2
22 Oct 2025	Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing HOUS-AM-778374	HOUS	8
22 Oct 2025	Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing HOUS-AM-778373	HOUS	8
22 Oct 2025	Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing HOUS-AM-778372	HOUS	5

Show all 24 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Italy National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124861?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Caterina CHINNICI”. Member record. memberId 124861. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124861?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124861. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/124861?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-124861,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Caterina CHINNICI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124861?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124861?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 124861. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124861. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 26

Amendments tabled in committee, 24

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928