Member

Jana TOOM

Renew · Estonia

Group: Renew
Country: Estonia
Roll-call participation: 83.5 %ⓘ of 261 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.8 % · 2026, final votes
With majority line: 94.5 %ⓘ of 217 votes where the group had a line · Renew median 93.1 %

More facts (5)

National party: KE Eesti Keskerakond
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 3 of 196 votesⓘ
Committees: EMPL, FEMM (substitute), JURI (substitute), PETI
Member id: 124700

National party: KE Eesti Keskerakond
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 3 of 196 votesⓘ
Committees: EMPL, FEMM (substitute), JURI (substitute), PETI
Member id: 124700

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

83.5 %

218 of 261 final votes while in office

Renew median: 92.3 % (−8.8 pts)

Chamber median: 90.8 %

With majority line ⓘ

94.5 %

205 of 217 votes where their group had a line

Renew median: 93.1 % (+1.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.5 %

3 of 196 votes where their group had a clear line

0 opposite (for ↔ against), 3 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.4 %

3 of 218 votes cast

Participation 83.5 % — Renew median 92.3 %, 77 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 77 members of the Renew with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Jana TOOM	83.5 %
Renew median	92.3 %
Lowest in the group	27.6 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	77

With majority line 94.5 % — Renew median 93.1 %, 77 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 77 members of the Renew with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Jana TOOM	94.5 %
Renew median	93.1 %
Lowest in the group	76.7 %
Highest in the group	97.8 %
Members	77

2026, 261 final votes; 261 of 342 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Renew; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For ≠ group	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 5 of 26 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	6	6
21 Jan 2026	8	8
22 Jan 2026	8	8
10 Feb 2026	8	8
11 Feb 2026	10	10
12 Feb 2026	8	8
24 Feb 2026	1	0
10 Mar 2026	9	0
11 Mar 2026	12	0
12 Mar 2026	6	0
26 Mar 2026	13	13
28 Apr 2026	14	14
29 Apr 2026	17	16
30 Apr 2026	11	11
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	10
21 May 2026	10	0
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	15
18 Jun 2026	7	7
7 Jul 2026	15	15
8 Jul 2026	15	15
9 Jul 2026	4	3
15 Sept 2026	12	12
16 Sept 2026	16	16
17 Sept 2026	10	10

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Renew

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Taner KABILOV	Taner KABILOV changed group	ECR	Bulgaria	97 % of 472 shared	92 %
Select Marjan ŠAREC	Marjan ŠAREC	Renew	Slovenia	96 % of 4 575 shared	92 %
Select Elena YONCHEVA	Elena YONCHEVA changed group	ECR	Bulgaria	96 % of 224 shared	92 %
Select Dainius ŽALIMAS	Dainius ŽALIMAS	Renew	Lithuania	96 % of 4 898 shared	92 %
Select Ilhan KYUCHYUK	Ilhan KYUCHYUK	Renew	Bulgaria	96 % of 4 684 shared	92 %
Select Valérie HAYER	Valérie HAYER	Renew	France	96 % of 4 825 shared	92 %
Select Vlad VASILE-VOICULESCU	Vlad VASILE-VOICULESCU	Renew	Romania	96 % of 4 516 shared	92 %
Select Charles GOERENS	Charles GOERENS	Renew	Luxembourg	95 % of 4 762 shared	92 %
Select Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Renew	Netherlands	95 % of 5 008 shared	92 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	95 % of 4 427 shared	92 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	S&D	Spain	90 % of 4 689 shared	86 %
Select Birgit SIPPEL	Birgit SIPPEL	S&D	Germany	90 % of 4 065 shared	86 %
Select Carla TAVARES	Carla TAVARES	S&D	Portugal	90 % of 4 693 shared	86 %
Select Isilda GOMES	Isilda GOMES	S&D	Portugal	90 % of 4 496 shared	86 %
Select Sven MIKSER	Sven MIKSER	S&D	Estonia	90 % of 5 056 shared	86 %
Select Lina GÁLVEZ	Lina GÁLVEZ	S&D	Spain	90 % of 4 428 shared	86 %
Select André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES	André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES	S&D	Portugal	90 % of 4 422 shared	86 %
Select Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ	Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ	S&D	Lithuania	90 % of 4 787 shared	86 %
Select Sérgio GONÇALVES	Sérgio GONÇALVES	S&D	Portugal	90 % of 4 940 shared	86 %
Select Jonás FERNÁNDEZ	Jonás FERNÁNDEZ	S&D	Spain	90 % of 4 644 shared	86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on PetitionsPETI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European UnionHOUS Special committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation to the EU-Serbia Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-RS Joint parliamentary committee	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation CommitteeD-RU Delegation	Member	8 Oct 2024	now
Delegation for relations with Central AsiaDCAS Delegation	Vice-chair	30 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working group	Member	19 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on DisabilityIG10-10 Intergroup / working group	Member	11 Mar 2025	now

Show all 15 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Official delegation	FEMM	10 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	EMPL	11 Jun 2026
Amending Directives (EU) 2016/2341 and 2016/97 as regards the strengthening of the framework for occupational retirement provision	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	EMPL	11 Mar 2026
Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	EMPL	16 Feb 2026
Establishment of European Business Wallets	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	JURI	16 Feb 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	JURI	28 Jan 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	FEMM	27 Jan 2026
Guidelines for the 2027 Budget - Section III	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	EMPL	12 Dec 2025
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Commission	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	EMPL	14 Oct 2025
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Agencies	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	EMPL	14 Oct 2025

Show all 36 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

21 contributions recorded; 8 on behalf of their group; 30 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
7 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 1 min	Read
6 Jul 2026	Coordination of social security systems (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 Jan 2026	Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
19 Jan 2026	Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies (debate)	Speech · 4 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	The urgent need to combat discrimination in the EU through the horizontal anti-discrimination directive (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Dec 2025	Presentation of the European Affordable Housing Plan (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
22 May 2025	Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 1 min	Read
2 Apr 2025	Topical debate (Rule 169) - Social Europe: making life affordable, protecting jobs, wages and health for all on behalf of Renew	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 21 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 11

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
16 Sept 2026	Decisions to return third-country nationals who are parents of minor EU citizens P-10-2026-003696	Priority written question	Not yet answered
13 Jul 2026	Support for the development of sexual assault centres in the EU E-10-2026-002872	Written questionwith 20 co-authors	Not yet answered
6 May 2026	Continuity of tertiary education for pregnant women and women with children E-10-2026-001857	Written questionwith 46 co-authors	3 Jul 2026
5 May 2026	Commission meeting with Taliban on deportations of Afghans E-10-2026-001828	Written questionwith 20 co-authors	4 Aug 2026
31 Mar 2026	Follow-up to the comprehensive approach to mental health after 2026 E-10-2026-001329	Written questionwith 3 co-authors	22 Jun 2026
21 Feb 2025	Working conditions of artists and workers in the cultural and creative sectors and industries E-10-2025-000809	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	22 Apr 2025
16 Dec 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Human rights situation in Kyrgyzstan, in particular the case of Temirlan Sultanbekov B-10-2024-0227	Motion for a resolutionwith 5 co-authors	—
6 Nov 2024	Clarification of Article 5 of the Artificial Intelligence Act regarding the deployment of remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces E-10-2024-002452	Written questionwith 16 co-authors	26 Feb 2025
1 Oct 2024	Use of Pegasus and other types of spyware in Slovakia E-10-2024-001920	Written questionwith 34 co-authors	28 Nov 2024
26 Sept 2024	The spread of bluetongue virus throughout the EU E-10-2024-001845	Written questionwith 39 co-authors	15 Nov 2024

Show all 11 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 60

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
2 Sept 2026	Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States EMPL-AM-792013	EMPL	23
14 Jul 2026	Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2025 PETI-AM-790995	PETI	23
13 Jul 2026	General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections EMPL-AM-789962	EMPL	12
9 Jul 2026	Boosting skills in the Union – opportunities for vocational education and training in times of transition FEMM-AM-790217	FEMM	10
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790100	CJ71	2
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790103	CJ71	2
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790097	CJ71	1
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790101	CJ71	1
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790159	CJ71	8
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790093	CJ71	8

Show all 60 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Renew Europe Renew · Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism

National delegation

Delegation Estonia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124700?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Jana TOOM”. Member record. memberId 124700. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124700?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124700. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/124700?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-124700,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Jana TOOM}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124700?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124700?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 124700. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124700. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Renew

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 11

Amendments tabled in committee, 60

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928