Skip to content

Member

Terry REINTKE

Greens · Germany

Group
Greens Verts/ALE
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
98.6 %ⓘ of 516 roll calls in office · chamber median 93.4 % · 2024 (from july), roll calls
With majority line
97.6 %ⓘ of 509 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 95.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
GRÜNE. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
5 of 493 votesⓘ
Committees
CONT (substitute), SEDE (substitute)
Member id
103381
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

Roll-call participation ⓘ

98.6 %

509 of 516 roll calls while in office

Greens median: 97.9 % (+0.8 pts)

Chamber median: 93.4 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.6 %

497 of 509 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 95.1 % (+2.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.0 %

5 of 493 votes where their group had a clear line

2 opposite (for ↔ against), 0 abstained against the line, 3 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

2.8 %

14 of 509 votes cast

Participation 98.6 % — Greens median 97.9 %, 53 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 53 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Terry REINTKE98.6 %
Greens median97.9 %
Lowest in the group4.1 %
Highest in the group100.0 %
Members53
With majority line 97.6 % — Greens median 95.1 %, 52 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 52 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Terry REINTKE97.6 %
Greens median95.1 %
Lowest in the group78.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members52
  • 2024 (from July), 516 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
13 Feb 2025Further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia Separate vote on paragraph 25 396 for, 118 against, 36 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
13 Feb 2025Further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia Separate vote on paragraph 23 419 for, 77 against, 58 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
13 Feb 2025Further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia Amendment 2 to paragraph 10 199 for, 261 against, 94 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
13 Feb 2025Further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia Paragraph 9 — part 2 394 for, 113 against, 43 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
13 Feb 2025Further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia Separate vote on paragraph 8 412 for, 85 against, 60 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
13 Feb 2025Further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia Separate vote on paragraph 7 417 for, 96 against, 46 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
13 Feb 2025Further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia Paragraph 4 — part 1 390 for, 98 against, 67 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
13 Feb 2025Further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia Separate vote on paragraph 3 390 for, 109 against, 52 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
13 Feb 2025Further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia Paragraph 2 — part 1 402 for, 104 against, 51 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
13 Feb 2025Further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 142 for, 405 against, 6 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
13 Feb 2025Continuing detention and risk of the death penalty for individuals in Nigeria charged with blasphemy, notably the case of Yahaya Sharif-Aminu Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 4 246 for, 259 against, 20 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
13 Feb 2025Continuing detention and risk of the death penalty for individuals in Nigeria charged with blasphemy, notably the case of Yahaya Sharif-Aminu Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 2 73 for, 407 against, 67 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
13 Feb 2025Repression by the Ortega-Murillo regime in Nicaragua, targeting human rights defenders, political opponents and religious communities in particular Amendment 1 to paragraph 9 194 for, 225 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
13 Feb 2025Repression by the Ortega-Murillo regime in Nicaragua, targeting human rights defenders, political opponents and religious communities in particular Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 2 147 for, 395 against, 3 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
13 Feb 2025Recent dismissals and arrests of mayors in Türkiye Amendment 1, adding text after recital E 114 for, 415 against, 12 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
13 Feb 2025Recent dismissals and arrests of mayors in Türkiye Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 148 for, 362 against, 35 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
13 Feb 2025Recent dismissals and arrests of mayors in Türkiye Amendment 2 to paragraph 7 124 for, 387 against, 34 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
13 Feb 2025Recent dismissals and arrests of mayors in Türkiye Separate vote on paragraph 6 481 for, 18 against, 52 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
13 Feb 2025Recent dismissals and arrests of mayors in Türkiye Amendment 5 to paragraph 6 123 for, 388 against, 32 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2025Genetically modified maize MON 95275 Final vote — text as a wholeObjection passed 467 for, 156 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2025Genetically modified maize MON 95275 Amendment 2, adding text after recital M 293 for, 250 against, 107 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Feb 2025Genetically modified maize MON 95275 Amendment 4, adding text after recital J 209 for, 407 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2025Genetically modified maize MON 95275 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 5 209 for, 408 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2025Genetically modified maize MON 95275 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 256 for, 321 against, 70 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Abstained
12 Feb 2025Genetically modified maize DP910521 Final vote — text as a wholeObjection passed 477 for, 152 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2025Genetically modified maize DP910521 Amendment 2, adding text after recital V 290 for, 249 against, 110 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Feb 2025Genetically modified maize DP910521 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 262 for, 309 against, 76 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Abstained
12 Feb 2025Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation Final votePassed 608 for, 33 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2025VAT: rules for the digital age Council draft 589 for, 42 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 378 for, 233 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Recital H — part 2 538 for, 83 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Amendment 21, adding text after recital A 105 for, 512 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Amendment 20, adding text after recital A 153 for, 477 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Amendment 19, adding text after recital A 127 for, 450 against, 68 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Amendment 18, adding text after recital A 133 for, 359 against, 154 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Amendment 17, adding text before recital A 132 for, 337 against, 179 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Paragraph 42 — part 2 476 for, 104 against, 66 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 39 99 for, 424 against, 121 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Amendment 29 to paragraph 39 163 for, 450 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Amendment 32 to paragraph 36 141 for, 461 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Paragraph 32 — part 2 494 for, 87 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Paragraph 32 — part 1 512 for, 89 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Amendment 6 to paragraph 28 316 for, 286 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Paragraph 27 — part 2 262 for, 315 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Paragraph 27 — part 1 532 for, 60 against, 44 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 26 501 for, 17 against, 120 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 26 213 for, 332 against, 95 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Amendment 27 to paragraph 26 125 for, 449 against, 63 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Separate vote on paragraph 25 489 for, 114 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Feb 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Paragraph 23 — part 3 610 for, 9 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 0 of 22 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242323
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202422
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249291
7 Oct 202422
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241818
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129128
24 Oct 20241313
13 Nov 202422
14 Nov 20243634
25 Nov 202421
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245757
17 Dec 20241313
18 Dec 20243331
19 Dec 20244545

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Hannah NEUMANN GreensGermany99 % of 5 052 shared94 %
Bas EICKHOUT Former memberGreensNetherlands99 % of 4 355 shared94 %
Erik MARQUARDT GreensGermany99 % of 5 187 shared94 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany99 % of 5 457 shared94 %
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN GreensGermany99 % of 4 999 shared94 %
Daniel FREUND GreensGermany99 % of 5 473 shared94 %
Michael BLOSS GreensGermany99 % of 5 369 shared94 %
Maria OHISALO GreensFinland99 % of 4 639 shared94 %
Martin HÄUSLING GreensGermany99 % of 5 222 shared94 %
Alexandra GEESE GreensGermany99 % of 4 894 shared94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Aurore LALUCQ S&DFrance89 % of 4 352 shared83 %
Mohammed CHAHIM S&DNetherlands89 % of 4 795 shared83 %
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN S&DFrance88 % of 4 886 shared83 %
Emma RAFOWICZ S&DFrance88 % of 3 793 shared83 %
Thijs REUTEN S&DNetherlands88 % of 5 339 shared83 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany88 % of 4 617 shared83 %
Marit MAIJ S&DNetherlands88 % of 5 469 shared83 %
Lara WOLTERS S&DNetherlands88 % of 4 984 shared83 %
Murielle LAURENT S&DFrance87 % of 4 998 shared83 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany87 % of 3 905 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with JapanD-JP DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now

Show all 5 seats

Dossiers

Show all 7 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

43 contributions recorded; 40 on behalf of their group; 98 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 3

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Amendments tabled in committee, 7

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 7 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Terry REINTKE”. Member record. memberId 103381. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/103381?page=107&period=2024&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/103381. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/103381?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-103381,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Terry REINTKE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/103381?page=107&period=2024&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/103381?page=107&period=2024&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 103381. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/103381. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}